.seriously? Well, since the police wants to avoid trouble, they won’t catch students just because they’rehaving sex But.if ever the girl’s parents filed a complaint to the police, that would be enough to put the boy to the protective custody. The power of Parentsor Guardiansare strong compared to the minors!
.Is that so?
Then, I won’t get caught. No, I’m already guilty in rape of Yukino and Mana. Both of them were virgin so it can be upgraded to rape with injuries.
Now then.regarding this Youth protection and nurture law, a very big case happened in the supreme court in 1985
Finally, Minaho-neesan’s eye sparkle!
The students in the classroom are listening to Minaho-neesan’s lesson seriously.
A man arrested from violating the Youth protection and nurture law.has claimed during the trial.We are properly engaged.That was accepted and the supreme court has declared that he’s innocent
When you admit that you’reengaged.you’re innocent?
Written on the sentence.It is difficult to think of a punishment that would be accepted by the social norm, the youth is an engaged person which corresponds to sincere relationship which includes performing sexual acts with the youth4
.What does that mean?
The glasses girl asks for explanation.
In short.if they have anSincere relationship in accordance with the engagementThey can’t be apprehended by theYouth Protection and Nurture law You’ll never get arrested or taken under protective custody. Even if the police has a selfish conviction and the couple was arrested and taken under custody, they will definitely win when it comes to the trial. Because the supreme court has the best official guarantee of judgement!
.Haa
Minaho-neesan knows a anything.
.That means?
.Eh, what’s going on? Yamamine-chan and Yoshida-kun.are engagedright now! They belong to the youth and it doesn’t matter if they have sex?
Once again, the class became noisy.
Uhm, Sensei.I’d like to ask this at least, what does it mean by Sincere relationship in accordance with the engagement
Yeah.I’m curious about that too.
Well, you see.for the time being, isn’t the main principle just saying They promised to marry in the future?
Isn’t that just the same as engagement? Isn’t that okay if the woman just says Let’s get married!?
Minaho-neesan smiles wryly from the extreme words of the delinquent.
.Engagementisn’t established by just having the party concerned Swear by words You won’t know if they’re serious from just verbal promise you know. When it comes to the trial and you don’t have a concrete evidence like letters or email sent to the other party, you can’t prove it. Especially for minors.the minimum requirement for them is to have the Guardiansapprove the relationship Eh.we need the parent’s consent?
Under Japanese law, men can be married from 18 years old and women starting 16.in case of minors, parental consent is necessary. If you don’t have the parental consent, you can’t get married, of course you can’t get engagedeither!
Minaho-neesan smiles.
Even if you insistMy parents opposed but we’re assuming sincere relationship in accordance with the engagement the minor under parental authority will normally be arrested from violating the Youth Protection and nurture law
Sensei said happily.
It will never be accepted. Real story, there’s one case. You see.There’s one man and a female high school student going out, the high school girl’s parents filed a complaint for violating the youth protection and nurture law and arrested the man but, the man claimed that He’s currently divorced with his wife and intends to marry the high school girlhe was found innocent by the trial only once. But.This is one peculiar case. Because the prosecution didn’t appeal, it was concluded by the judgement of the summary court. This man who was found innocent in the trial filed a lawsuit against the local government and the country that prosecuted him.The high court declared This is unthinkable as a serious relationshipreferring that the previous judgement is the exact opposite, so he lost in the Supreme court. Perhaps, if the trial is fought in the Supreme Court, it wouldn’t have been admitted as a serious relationship!
.Err
In short.As long as you don’t have a concrete proof where the parents and the people around say These people are really having a sincere relationshipyou can’t have sex with a high school student? No.Of course this is a legal talk.actually it’s known that there’s a lot high school students who are having sex. In municipalities with Youth protection and nurture lawthey can’t complain if they are arrested by the police!
By the way, most of the local governments in Japan have created their original Youth protection and nurture law Nagano is famous for not haing one but there are rules in Nagano prefecture’s cities. The contents of the law have small difference for each local government
.Haa, is that how it is?
The ordinance of Tokyo established in 2005 us amazing. It says You must not perform sexual acts or any similar lascivious acts to the youth. It is a declaration that youth can’t have sex at any case!
That’s amazing.
That means that sex with anyone below high school students are banned. What the hell is the guy who wrote Season of the sundoing?
But.please wait a moment. Although the law is clearly written so far.Isn’t it strange for the Engagedto be okay to have sex even if they’re still high school students?
The glasses girl still keep holding on.
You see.the law only restricts improper sexual intercourse
Minaho-neesan answers smoothly.
The idea is that sex betweenfiancésis not animproper sexual act.
Eh?
My sex wit Megu isn’t improper? No.I think it is? I’m super aroused you know.
Going back to that precedent set by the Supreme Court of 1985. The indecent acts involving young people. Obscenity was defined not only by sexual intercourse involving violent threats, intimidation, or monetary compensation. But also encompassed developing adolescents who satisfied their sexual urges.
Eh. what does that mean?
.That is to say, For young people, boys and girls under the age of high school students, any contact with slightly perverted connotations such as kissing or petting, was enough to be classified as obscenity.
Eh. just a little touching is already a crime?
Just a while ago, I spoke that in the case where there is an engagement set a safe precedent, I will now continue that story. The Supreme court handed down a ruling, However. Regarding the sexual activities between the two young adolescents, given the existence of an engagement supplemented with an appropriate earnest and serious relationship, dispensing punishment would be quite difficult considering the normal societal conventions. Thus this case does not demonstrate improper sexual relations as defined by the definition of obscenity.
.ehh?
.what does that mean?
The fact that those two are engaged. having sex is not an indecent act and does not become a sex crime. Is that what you are saying?
The glasses girl asked the teacher.
The talk suddenly became quite advanced making it impossible for the rowdy boys and girls to even make a come-back in response to Minaho-nee-san’s words
It is as you say. Being engaged means that they’ve formally made the promise of marriage.
Minaho-nee-san clearly states.
.For what is the purpose of marriage? Making children, leaving behind offspring? That’s why, sex between a married couple is not regarded as an indecent act. Rather its their duty. That’s why sex incompatibility is sufficient grounds for divorce
.yeah.
As I’ve said. According to Japanese law, men can be married from 18 and up, whereas women from 16 and up. This law is even applicable to high school students. In Japan, even high school students can get married with the parental consent. The formal recognition of marriage means the formal recognition of sex, don’t you agree? The civil laws established by the country overrules ordinances established by local governments. In other words. Even if a high school student has sex, because the married couple’s sex is not an indecent act, it does not violate the Youth Protection and Nurture law . Accordingly. the same can be said for a fiance, who has made a formal promise of marriage, sex would not be regarded as an indecent act as declared by the Supreme Court.