"Very important, I'd say."
Adam felt a spark of excitement, a tingling at the back of his neck. The keenness of Fini's combative instincts, though frequently aroused, sometimes held the added promise of pitched battle and, most gratifying of all, of some new landmark in the law on which his clerk's fingerprints, however faint, might appear.
"What would you like me to do?" Adam inquired.
"My homework. Dig into every question, Adam. Then, if you feel it's justified, prepare a thorough countermemo arguing for a grant of the State's petition." Fini tossed back the opinion in his hand. "Looks like Viet Nhu's dissent should give you a head start."
"Right away," Adam promised.
* * *
Unsmiling, Caroline Masters looked up from her work. While generally polite, she was not always gracious about interruptions, and this was such a day. "What is it?" she asked curtly.
Though undaunted, Callista decided not to sit. "I'm afraid I've attracted a Fini-gram."
"Indeed?" With a sigh at this allusion to Fini's oft-bombastic e-mails, Caroline leaned back in her chair. "Concerning what peril to our nation's jurisprudence?"
"The Price case, another Ninth Circuit reversal of a death sentence. I gave you the memo a few days ago."
"I remember it." Frowning, Caroline became still, a reflective figure framed by the only personal mementos on her credenza—a photograph of her daughter, Brett, another taken with President Kilcannon in the Rose Garden on the day of her surprising nomination. "The freestanding innocence question is a bit dicey," the Chief allowed. "I'd prefer the Court not grapple with it now. Is Justice Fini's communiqué in the nature of a polemic, or does it come with a concrete plan of action?"
"It comes with a countermemo." Written, Callista did not add, by a bow-tied and overprivileged little reactionary from Virginia Law School, quite possibly America's whitest male. "Justice Fini wants you to put the Price case on the discuss list."
Though Caroline smiled resignedly, Callista could imagine her perplexity. The Chief Justice's "discuss list," circulated before each conference among the justices, specified the petitions she deemed worthy of consideration. While the vast majority of petitions never made the list—and, therefore, were dead—any associate justice could request that a petition be added to the list. When that justice was Anthony Fini, what followed was often contentious: not only did Fini give no quarter but he was that rarest of justices on a decorous Court, a vigorous lobbyist for his positions. And never more so than in opposing strictures on the death penalty, for which he was an unabashed proponent—Rennell Price, whoever he was, had become less a person than a potential milestone in the law.
After a moment, Caroline Masters stirred herself from thought. "Prepare another memo," she directed briskly. "Hit all the issues raised by Justice Fini, and all the reasons not to take this case. I don't think it would be in the interest of the law or, in candor, this Court."
"How so?"
The Chief Justice considered her, then offered a rare elaboration of her thoughts. "Capital punishment," she answered, "distorts the law, imports the corruptions of politics into whether a prisoner lives or dies, and corrodes relations among the justices. Eventually, death penalty cases present so many fundamental questions that they can color one justice's view of another as a human being. I don't want that to happen to my colleagues."
Or to me, Callista could sense the Chief thinking. Caroline Masters was no doubt aware of the subterranean bitterness swirling among the justices—the rumor, for example, that after the latest approval of an execution in Mississippi, Justice Fini had referred to the Chief Justice's dissenting ally Justice Huddleston as a "hand-wringing mediocrity," and that the venerable Huddleston had labeled Fini "the only justice in memory who'd have deferred to the commandant of Auschwitz." The Chief Justice surely did not want another death row inmate to put her Court, or these emotions, in play.
"Do you want me to circulate my memo?" Callista asked.
"Only after I read it," Caroline Masters answered. "With all respect, Callista, I might want to take a hand in this myself."
FOUR
TWO FRIDAYS LATER, THE NINE JUSTICES OF THE UNITED STATES Supreme Court gathered in the Chief Justice's conference room.
To Caroline Masters, the room combined the clubby aura of an inner sanctum with a distinct sense of history—wood paneling, a fireplace, a rich red carpet, oil portraits of Chief Justices Marshall and Jay in scarlet robes, shelves filled with books preserving the Court's prior rulings. At other such conferences, the Court had unanimously voted to bar segregation in Brown v. Board of Education and, two decades later, divided bitterly over Roe v. Wade. The two rulings, so different in conception and consequence, were ever on Caroline's mind; if she could manage to build consensus—and this task was not easy—this Court would not exacerbate the acrid cultural and social schisms which existed in contemporary America, and which made the ongoing battle over federal judicial nominations as incendiary as had been her own.
Certainly, the timeless rituals of these conferences were crafted to preserve decorum. Each began with the justices shaking hands before they sat at a long table inlaid with green leather and illuminated by a crystal chandelier. Their places, too, were preordained: Caroline sat at one end of the table in a leather chair bearing a brass nameplate which said simply "The Chief Justice"; the opposite end was reserved for the senior associate justice, Walter Huddleston. The next most senior justices—Anthony Fini, McGeorge Glynn, Thomas Raymond—sat to Caroline's right, while the four who were most junior—John Ware, Bryson Kelly, Miriam Rothbard, and Dennis Millar—faced them across the table. The Court's newest member, Justice Millar, was stationed nearest the door, so as to pass messages or requests for additional documents to the messenger waiting outside. On the surface, Caroline thought dryly, everyone knew his place.
But the far less neutral way in which they defined their places made Caroline edgy. In the most contentious cases she, Huddleston, and Rothbard battled with Fini, Kelly, and Ware for the votes of the centrists—Glynn, Raymond, and Millar. So that today, when Justice Fini grinned and shook her hand, she thought of former Justice Byrnes's remark that the handshake reminded him of the referee's instructions before a prize fight: "Shake hands, go to your corner, and come out fighting."
Still, as the conference wended its way through the discuss list, their exchanges remained sufficiently muted that Caroline dared to hope contention might take a holiday. When they arrived at the Price case, she said with deceptive ease, "This one's yours, Tony."
Immediately she sensed a heightened alertness among the others, underscored by Justice Huddleston's quizzical frown toward his nemesis, Anthony Fini: challenges to a memo from the cert pool were unusual, and the sharpness of Fini's language, an incitement to controversy, was matched by the lawyerly thoroughness of Caroline's response. And if Fini carried Kelly and Ware—a near certainty—all he needed for the Court to grant the State of California's petition was the vote of a single centrist.
"To begin with," Fini said crisply, "this case involves a horrendous crime—"
"They're all horrendous," Huddleston murmured with a rumble of disdain.
Fini paused, to signal his annoyance, then continued as though Huddleston had not spoken. "—in a case which, to me, is wrongly decided and bristles with contempt for AEDPA. Not to mention whole paragraphs of result-oriented jurisprudence contrived by its progenitors, Judges Sanders and Montgomery."
You just can't resist going after Montgomery, Caroline thought.