Выбрать главу

note 11

Ot en mekem ?ama?: kulkedak otti ot ekam omboce palajanak.

My great deed is this: I travel to find my brother's other half.

note 12

Rekature, saradak, tappadak, odam, ka?a o numa waram, es avaa owe o lewl mahoz.

We dance, we chant, we dream ecstatically, to call my spirit bird, and to open the door to the other world.

note 13

Ntak o numa waram, es muzdulak, jomadak.

I mount my spirit bird and we begin to move, we are under way.

note 14

Piwtadak ot En Puwe tyvinak, ecidak alatt o juti, kinta, es szelemek lamtijaknak.

Following the trunk of the Great Tree, we fall into the nether world.

[Follow-we the Great Tree trunk-of, fall-we through the night, mist, and ghosts lowland-

their-of.]

Fazak, fazak no o saro.

It is cold, very cold.

note 15

Juttadak ot ekam o akarataban, o'sivaban, es o sielaban.

My brother and I are linked in mind, heart, and soul.

note 16

Ot ekam sielanak ka?a engem.

My brother's soul calls to me.

note 17

Kuledak es piwtadak ot ekam.

I hear and follow his track.

note 18

Sayedak es tuledak ot ekam kulyanak.

Encounter-I the demon who is devouring my brother's soul.

note 19

Nenam coro; o kuly torodak. In anger, I fight the demon.

note 20

0 kuly pel engem.

He is afraid of me.

note 21

Lejkkadak o ka?ka salamaval.

1 strike his throat with a lightning bolt.

note 22

Molodak ot ainaja, komakamal.

I break his body with my bare hands.

note 23

Toya es molana.

He is bent over, and falls apart.

note 24

Han ca?a. He runs away. note 25

Manedak ot ekam sielanak. I rescue my brother's soul.

note 26

Aladak ot ekam sielanak o komamban.

I lift my brother's soul in the hollow of my hand.

note 27

Al?dam ot ekam numa waramra.

I lift him onto my spirit bird.

note 28

Piwtadak ot En Puwe tyvijanak es sayedak jalleen ot elava ainak majaknak.

Following up the Great Tree, we return to the land of the living.

note 29

Ot ekam ela jalleen. My brother lives again. note 30

Ot ekam wenca jalleen.

He is complete again.

note 31

To hear this chant, visit: http://www.christinefeehan.com/ members/

4. Carpathian chanting technique

As with their healing techniques, the actual «chanting technique» of the Carpathians has much in common with the other shamanistic traditions of the Central Asian steppes. The primary mode of chanting was throat chanting using overtones. Modern examples of this manner of singing can still be found in the Mongolian, Tuvan, and Tibetan traditions. You can find an audio example of the Gyuto Tibetan Buddhist monks engaged in throat chanting at: http://www.christinefeehan.com/carpathianchanting/

As with Tuva, note on the map the geographical proximity of Tibet to Kazakhstan and the Southern Urals.

The beginning part of the Tibetan chant emphasizes synchronizing all the voices around a single tone, aimed at healing a particular «chakra» of the body. This is fairly typical of the Gyuto throat chanting tradition, but it is not a significant part of the Carpathian tradition. Nonetheless, it serves as an interesting contrast.

The part of the Gyuto chanting example that is most similar to the Carpathian style of chanting is the mid-section, where the men are chanting the words together with great force. The purpose here is not to generate a «healing tone» that will affect a particular «chakra,» but rather to generate as much power as possible for initiating the «out of body» travel, and for fighting the demonic forces that the healer/traveler must face and overcome.

Appendix 2

The Carpathian Language

Like all human languages, the language of the Carpathians contains the richness and nuance that can only come from a long history of use. At best we can only touch on some of the main features of the language in this brief appendix:

The history of the Carpathian language

Carpathian grammar and other characteristics of the language

Examples of the Carpathian language

A much abridged Carpathian dictionary

1. The history of the Carpathian language

The Carpathian language of today is essentially identical to the Carpathian language of thousands of years ago. A «dead» language like the Latin of two thousand years ago has evolved into a significantly different modern language (Italian) because of countless generations of speakers and great historical fluctuations. In contrast, many of the speakers of Carpathian from thousands of years ago are still alive. Their presence-coupled with the deliberate isolation of the Carpathians from the other major forces of change in the world– has acted (and continues to act) as a stabilizing force that has preserved the integrity of the language over the centuries. Carpathian culture has also acted as a stabilizing force. For instance, the Ritual Words, the various healing chants (see Appendix 1), and other cultural artifacts have been passed down the centuries with great fidelity.

One small exception should be noted: the splintering of the Carpathians into separate geographic regions has led to some minor dialectization. However the telepathic links among all Carpathians (as well as each Carpathian's regular return to his or her homeland) has ensured that the differences among dialects are relatively superficial (e.g., small numbers of new words, minor differences in pronunciation, etc.), since the deeper, internal language of mind-forms has remained the same because of continuous use across space and time.

The Carpathian language was (and still is) the proto-language for the Uralic (or Finno-Ugrian) family of languages. Today, the Uralic languages are spoken in northern, eastern and central Europe and in Siberia. More than twenty-three million people in the world speak languages that can trace their ancestry to Carpathian. Magyar or Hungarian (about fourteen million speakers), Finnish (about five million speakers), and Estonian (about one million speakers), arc the three major contemporary descendents of this proto-language. The only factor that unites the more than twenty languages in the Uralic family is that their ancestry can be traced back to a common proto-language-Carpathian-which split (starting some six thousand years ago) into the various languages in the Uralic family. In the same way, European languages such as English and French, belong to the better-known Indo-European family and also evolve from a common proto-language ancestor (a different one from Carpathian).

M

The following table provides a sense for some of the similarities in the language family.

Note: The Finnic/Carpathian «k» shows up often as Hungarian «h». Similarly, the Finnic/Carpathian «p» often corresponds to the Hungarian «f.» ^