“Yes.”
“To this day you have a relationship with Rachel, is that right?”
“Yes.”
“You lived with her in 1981 through 1982, isn’t that right?”
“Yes.”
“Did you hear her testimony that you had a romantic relationship during the summer of 1978?”
“I don’t recall.”
“If she did say it she would have been wrong, is that right?”
“I didn’t view our relationship as romantic. My relationship with Rachel has been of a different sort than that which you would accurately characterize as romantic or sexual. It’s not what we really had, I would say.”
“Over all this time you never had any sexual and/or romantic relationship?”
“Well, we have had some sexual incidents. What I’m trying to do is characterize it fairly for you. It was not the essential relationship with Rachel, and never with me, and never had been. It wasn’t in the summer of 1978 and it isn’t now.”
“I believe you’ve described your relationship with Rachel as artistic and intellectual, is that right?”
“Yes.”
“Was it that same with Shelly? Sex was not at the center of her universe either?”
“It was not.”
“How did you rekindle the relationship when you spent a four-day weekend with Rachel over Thanksgiving, 1978?”
“It was not a sex holiday, as you’re suggesting.”
“A romantic holiday then. What happened?”
“We went to see a number of art films in Cambridge. We went to see the glass flowers at Harvard in the exhibit there. We attended a lecture. We went to the museum of art.”
“Where did you stay?”
“With Rachel.”
“In her bedroom.”
“Yes.”
“But you wouldn’t characterize this weekend as intimate?”
“I don’t mean to suggest that the relationship with her or with any of the other people in my life was either orthodox or proper.”
“Now speaking of that weekend, what did you do to protect Susan Reinert?”
“Nothing.”
“You told this jury that you drove around her house and did many things over that time period when you found out about the threat, even to the point of sending Sue Myers away because Smith would kill on holidays. Why did you take that critical weekend off and go to Massachusetts if Susan Reinert was in such danger?”
“I tried to spend as much time as I could, do what I could about the situation with Doctor Smith. I couldn’t do so much that I gave up my life. And by Thanksgiving I was alarmed and concerned and afraid. By Christmas I went away again and I was even more alarmed and desperately tired. I couldn’t park in front of Susan Reinerts house during the whole holiday weekend without simply moving in. I couldn’t do it.”
“So you just gave up on the critical weekends and went someplace else so you wouldn’t even be anywhere near her house or near Jay C. Smith, is that right?”
“It was more than I could do. I really don’t know how I could’ve done much more and not ended up in the hospital.”
“How about calling the police?”
“Looking back, I wish I had done that. I think we all wish that.”
“Why didn’t you go to Susan Reinert and say, ‘Jay C. Smith has chains, he has locks, he has guns, he has silencers, he has all these things. And by the way, he’s threatening to kill you. You better do something about it.’ Did you ever say that to her?”
“No.”
“That would’ve been another way you could’ve protected her, could it not have been?”
“I don’t know that it would’ve worked, but it could have. I was not sure that there was a relationship between Susan Reinert and Doctor Smith. I could never find out for sure.”
“Wouldn’t that be all the more reason to tell her if this person you think she’s having a relationship with was going to kill her?”
“Looking back, I think it was.”
“But that didn’t occur to you at the time?”
“No.”
“It occurred to you to tell the police, but you dismissed it, is that right?”
“It occurred to us to speak, but we decided not to do that.”
“We. You keep saying we. Wasn’t it you that was bringing all this information to Mister Pappas, Miss Myers and Mister Valaitis? You were the one that brought all the information back, is that right?”
“Yes.”
“You were the one that was making decisions. You were the leader, weren’t you?”
“I was not making the decisions solely. I sought their advice in everything I did.”
“The group was making decisions on the basis of your facts, isn’t that right?”
“Yes.”
“You indicated that you didn’t want to tell the police because they were corrupt, is that right?”
“Correct, and involved with Doctor Smith.”
“How many police departments did he control?”
“Not just the Upper Merion Township police. He mentioned that he knew someone with the West Chester police. He mentioned several people in the Philadelphia police. And he mentioned the police in Bucks County.”
“In other words, he had connections, so that nothing would happen to him and you’d be in trouble if you told?”
“Nothing would happen to him, but something would happen to me.”
“In other words, they’d tell him and he’d come and get you, is that right?”
“Yes.”
“Did you ever hear of the Pennsylvania State Police, Mister Bradfield?”
“Yes.”
“Are they listed in your telephone book at home?”
“Looking back I wish I had gone to them.”
“You could’ve picked up the phone and called the Pennsylvania State Police and said I don’t trust the Upper Merion Township police and I’m going to tell you people about these strange goings-on. You could’ve done that, is that right?”
“Any one of us could have done that.”
“You could have, couldn’t you?”
“We all could have.”
“But you could have.”
“Yes, indeed.”
“You didn’t, did you?”
“None of us did.”
“Have you heard of the Federal Bureau of Investigation?”
“Yes.”
“Did you call them?”
“No.”
“Did Jay C. Smith have contacts in the state police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation?”
“He never indicated that.”
As to the character of his relationship with Susan Reinert, William Bradfield said, “In 1976, Sue Myers had already had a confrontation with Susan Reinert and she said to me, ‘You’re wasting your life on this woman. She’s not worth your time.’ But I told her that anyone who is interested in literature to the point of teaching it, let alone of trying to write poetry as I was trying to do, should feel that any other person who is willing to be open with him in a real and honest way, in a personal way, is someone that anybody who’s interested in the arts can’t turn his back on.”
“I see. So, the relationship with Susan Reinert, if not romantic, was at least artistic? Is that what you’re telling us?”
“On my part?”
“Yes.”
“I guess all of my relationships are.”
“Artistic?”
“Yes.”
As to the prom night adventure and other Dr. Jay business, the testimony contained even more “we’s” and fewer “I’s” than the rest of it.
“Why did you need a silencer to protect yourself?”
“Because both Chris and I felt that if Doctor Smith were to threaten me while I was in the car I would have to try to wound him or disable him or kill him. We agreed that I’d call Chris and he’d come immediately and we’d figure out exactly what we were to do. If I’d have tried to defend myself with my.357 magnum it would’ve alerted half of Chester County.”
“When you’re talking about protecting yourself from an armed man who threatens you with a weapon, why did you need a silencer?”