(7) Has Mr. Safer considered the possibility that his own antipathy toward Ukrainians is genetically based? If
not, then how would he account for it? And if not, would Mr. Safer be willing to issue a public statement to the
effect that his anti-Ukrainianism is not genetic in origin?
(8) Could Mr. Safer comment on the possibility that the refusal of CBS personnel to discuss "The Ugly Face of
Freedom" might similarly be genetically-based? If CBS personnel reject the notion that their corporate decisions are
genetically influenced, then could Mr. Safer persuade them to issue a joint statement to this effect, and in
particular denying that they are genetically anti-Ukrainian?
These few and simple questions, it seems to me, serve the useful purpose of establishing what category Mr.
Safer's statement falls into: that of a responsible journalist who picks his words carefully and later stands by them,
or that of a bigot who gets up in front of the camera and begins to ramble off the top of his head - and later selects
muteness as the optimal defense for his irresponsibility.
Sincerely yours,
Lubomyr Prytulak
cc: Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Morley Safer, Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace
HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN
HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN 1473 hits since 23May98
Jordan Letter 6 Jul 19/96 Allowing a fabulist on 60 Minutes
July 19, 1996
Michael H. Jordan
Chairman, Westinghouse Electric Corporation
11 Stanwix Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
USA 15222
Dear Mr. Jordan:
When I began reading Simon Wiesenthal in late 1994, I was naive enough to imagine
that my discovery that he had a credibility problem was an original one. Since that
time, however, I have learned that Mr. Wiesenthal's lack of credibility is widely known
and openly acknowledged. For example, on April 28, 1996, I received a letter from a
Jewish faculty member at an American University, from which I quote the following:
I do not doubt for a moment ... that Simon Wiesenthal is a fabulist
which is the fancy literary word for an unmitigated liar. My father
(an Auschwitz inmate) told me many terrible stories about Wiesenthal's
role after the war in the Austrian DP camps. Wiesenthal is of the same
ilk as Elie Wieseclass="underline" a secular saint, he can make the most absurd claims
without fear of exposure.
Now the question that I would like to add to the ones that I have already addressed
to you is the following: How did it come to pass that in 1994 a reputable investigative
journalism show featured as its star witness someone who is widely known to be - shall
we say - a "fabulist"?
And from this question springs a second one: How does it come to pass today that a
reputable investigative journalism show, having learned that it has been victimized by
a "fabulist," refuses to take any corrective action?
Yours truly,
Lubomyr Prytulak
cc: Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Morley Safer, Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace, Simon Wiesenthal
HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE JORDAN 1763 hits since 23May98
Bleich Letter 8 23May98 Please substantiate or retract
If your 60 Minutes testimony concerning violent attacks on Jews by Ukrainians and
motivated by anti-Semitism is true, then it behooves you to substantiate it and in so doing
to remove the doubt which surrounds it. If your 60 Minutes testimony is false, then it
behooves you to retract it. Either option will constitute a step toward restoring your
standing in the eyes of the Ukrainian community, and in ameliorating Ukrainian-Jewish
relations.
Silence is an option only if you are prepared to encourage the conclusion that you spoke
impulsively and irresponsibly, and that you subsequently lacked the courage and integrity
to admit your error.
May 23, 1998
Rabbi Yaakov Dov Bleich
29 Shchekavytska Street
Kiev 254071
Ukraine
Dear Rabbi Bleich:
In your appearance on the 60 Minutes broadcast "The Ugly Face of Freedom" of 23
October 1994, you offered some startling testimony concerning the existence of
anti-Semitism in contemporary Ukraine. In your own words:
There have been a number of physical attacks. In a small town, two
elderly Jews were attacked at knifepoint and stabbed because they are
Jews and because of the myth that all Jews must have money hidden in
their homes. The same thing was in west Ukraine, the Carpathian
region. These are very, very frightening facts, because it's - again
that stereotype that we mentioned before, when that leads someone to
really - to - to stab an older couple and leave them helpless, and
you know? - they left them for dead. That means that we have serious
problems.
In the mind of the typical 60 Minutes viewer, your statement would constitute a
substantial proportion of the Ugly Face of Freedom's evidence for the existence of
anti-Semitism in today's Ukraine, and the only evidence at all for the eruption of this
anti-Semitism into violence.
However, I cannot help noticing that your statement is devoid of detail. You do
not disclose the names of the victims, nor the places and dates of the attacks. Nor do
you indicate the source of your information - did you hear about these attacks on the
radio, see them on television, read about them in the newspapers, receive personal
communication, or what? This lack of detail is particularly troubling in view of four
considerations:
(1) that your non-specific testimony occurred in the middle of a broadcast which
was dominated by misrepresentation and disinformation;
(2) that it came from the mouth of an individual recognized in the Ukrainian
community for holding anti-Ukrainian views, and for spreading anti-Ukrainian hatred, as
I think I have demonstrated in my seven previous letters to you of 6Jan95, 26Sep97,
27Sep97, 28Sep97, 29Sep97, 29Sep97, and 30Sep97, in which letters are discussed such
issues as that of your reciting every Saturday in the capital city of Ukraine the
Khmelnytsky curse;
(3) that Jewish interests have sometimes employed exaggerated, or wholly-imagined,
or even self-inflicted anti-Semitic acts to achieve such aims as heightened group
cohesion or increased emigration to Israel; and
(4) that Jewish groups in Ukraine who monitor anti-Semitic incidents report being
unaware of the two attacks that you describe.
Specifically with respect to point (4) above, an open letter to Morley Safer and
the 60 Minutes staff from I. M. Levitas, Head of the Jewish Council of Ukraine as well
as of the Nationalities Associations of Ukraine, as published in the Lviv newspaper Za
Vilnu Ukrainu (For a Free Ukraine) on December 2, 1994, included the following
observations, which I translate from the original Ukrainian. In the portion of the
letter that I quote below, Mr. Levitas argues that the attacks you describe may have
been simple robberies devoid of anti-Semitism. More importantly, Mr. Levitas provides
us with reason to wonder whether the attacks occurred at alclass="underline"
You reported that two Jews were robbed and beaten. This might have
happened, but most likely not because they were Jews. I imagine that
in Lviv, Ukrainians are also robbed (and significantly more often!),
and yet nobody draws from this the sort of conclusions concerning
ethnic hostility that you draw from the robbing of these two Jews.
Our Jewish Council constantly receives news concerning Jews in
Ukraine, but during the past five years, we have received not a single
report of anyone being beaten because he was a Jew. However, it must
be admitted that such a thing may have occurred without it coming to
our attention - there are plenty of miscreants in every country.
The above speculations lead us once again to the questions of whether your
orientation toward the Ukrainian state is supportive or destructive, responsible or
irresponsible, restrained by reason or fired by emotion. A step toward answering such
questions would be taken by your responding to the points below:
(1) Would you be able to provide the names of the two sets of Jewish victims that
you alluded to (that is, the victims of the knife attack, and the similar victims in the
"Carpathian region"), and the places and dates of the attacks? If by "a number of
attacks" you mean more than two, I would appreciate receiving such documentation for the
other attacks as well. If in addition you are in possession of corroborative evidence
such as videotapes, newspaper clippings, or letters, I would appreciate receiving copies
of these as well.
(2) If the attacks did occur, then there follows the question of what motivated
them. Mr. Levitas suggests that if the knife attack occurred, then it was more likely
driven by economic motives than anti-Semitic ones. You, on the other hand offer that
the attack occurred "because they are Jews," and "because of the myth that all Jews must
have money hidden in their homes," and because "it's - again that stereotype." But for
you to know that the motivation was predominantly anti-Semitic, the perpetrators of the
attacks must have been caught and must have confessed and disclosed their motivation,
unless there exists some alternative evidence pointing to the same conclusion. In any
case, whatever the nature of the material that you relied upon to conclude that the two
attacks had been motivated by anti-Semitism, I wonder if you would be able to provide me
with a copy of it.
(3) I myself was unaware of any Ukrainian "myth that all Jews must have money
hidden in their homes." This strikes me not so much as a myth believed by Ukrainians
about Jews, as a myth believed by yourself about Ukrainians. I wonder if you could
inform me of what evidence you have that Ukrainians are so primitive in their thinking
as to entertain the fantastic myth that "all Jews must have money hidden in their
homes."
If your 60 Minutes testimony concerning violent attacks on Jews by Ukrainians and
motivated by anti-Semitism is true, then it behooves you to substantiate it and in so
doing to remove the doubt which surrounds it. If your 60 Minutes testimony is false,
then it behooves you to retract it. Either option will constitute a step toward
restoring your standing in the eyes of the Ukrainian community, and in ameliorating