Now, there are many people who argue: "Oh, we're never peaceful and we'll always try to kill each other."
The truth is most people don't want to go around murdering each other. Out of six billion people, most are actually very nice peaceful people.
Unfortunately we have not been willing to restrain the few rabid dogs that routinely like to attack the flock.
In super-secret projects, there are people who fantasize about using these technologies to go into space, like 'Star Wars', with guns blazing. But technologies that go beyond the crossing point of light cannot be applied for a weapon system and have a people survive its use, any more than we could have survived a thermonuclear launch.
Some in these covert projects have misinterpreted certain ET actions: For example, when we tried to detonate a nuclear weapon on the moon, to show the USSR how powerful America was, an extraterrestrial vehicle came in and intercepted it and destroyed it. Now, you could take that to be evidence that these ETs were hostile towards us, when in reality they were trying to protect facilities on the moon, and also the sanctity of space as a peaceful place free from weapons of mass destruction.
But from the shoes of those humans who wanted to see that moon detonation happen, their frustration could lead to the assumption that this ET action was proof of their hostility!
A number of such events have happened, where humans have misinterpreted ET actions as evidence of hostility, when in reality it was evidence of enlightenment.
These extraterrestrial civilizations are simply trying to contain an immature and out-of-control militarized civilization on earth from escaping the biosphere and going out into space.
But depending on your perspective, you can view it as one way or another. I am quite certain that the ET intent is peaceful. But if you wanted to spin such an event to, say, President Reagan, or to someone else inclined to support Star Wars, you could cite that event and say, "See, there is a threat we're facing. We need to build up weapons in space and hit them hard!"
I am not speaking theoretically as I give you these examples. These are things that have actually happened and have led to justifications for targeting extraterrestrial vehicles and weaponizing space.
We have Disclosure Project witnesses to ET events where 16 to 18 intercontinental ballistic missiles were taken offline completely, instantly. (see Bob Salas' testimony in Chapter 29.)
And when I asked them, "What do you think the ETs were saying?" They say,
"We think they were trying to tell us, please don't blow up this beautiful planet."
Now, you could take that same event and come to a different assess- ment, and say, "Well they are interfering with our national security preparedness. They were making us vulnerable to the Soviets".
The same action can be interpreted different ways, depending on whether you are in a paranoid mindset and are motivated by aggrandizing your military- industrial budget.
ET actions have shown us on many occasions, that if we were to engage in acts that would jeopardize the survivability of life on earth, they would intervene and stop it— and they could do it very quickly.
This was demonstrated over and over again -- the launch at Vandenburg AFB which was intercepted and destroyed, the moon intercept, taking these 16 intercontinental ballistic missiles offline. I am certain the extraterrestrial civilizations were trying to tell us, "Don't go down the path of mutually assured destruction, but if you do, we can stop it."
Now, what a lot of people don't know is that similar events were happening in Russia at exactly the same time. ET actions were trying to say to all these parties on earth: "Make peace, and don't go down this path of mass destruction—and if you try, we're going to stop you anyway."
They weren't trying to give the Soviets an advantage over us, if they were doing the same things in the Soviet Union at the same time!
ET civilizations certainly are not going to let us send these weapons into space.
And if we try, they will be tossed back like a bad penny.
When covert shadow government operations have tried to go out in space with ARVs and other super-advanced spacecraft, they have been shut down.
A Defense Intelligence Agency witness told me that we had a num- ber of sophisticated satellite systems that were pointed out into space -- not down to the Soviet Union. They were being used to track and target extraterrestrial vehicles out in space. He said the ET s were routinely shutting these systems down, out of self-defense. But such actions angered the 'Masters of the Universe' types who are not accustomed to having their plans frustrated.
So, if you wanted to spin such events to people inclined towards paranoia and militarism, it would be easy to do. And that is what's happened over the last 50 years.
A president or other high official is vulnerable to this "cherry-pick- ing of intelligence," and a xenophobic spin being placed on events. And who else is available to such officials to provide another perspective? This is one of the real risks of closed, secret systems.
But ETs want us to solve our own dysfunction; they will intervene significantly and openly only in the case of global thermonuclear war, a massive geophysical collapse, or in the event that humans take actions that would upset the order of peace in the universe.
This is not the route of first choice, because if one culture moves into another culture and tries to artificially impose something, it is almost universally a failure.
The idea that extraterrestrial civilizations will come to earth, and impose some new order is a fantasy. These are lessons that we have to learn as a people who are stumbling out of childhood's end and into maturity and adulthood.
Extraterrestrial civilizations have been observing our development for many, many, years -- maybe thousands and perhaps millions. They will not let one perverse generation destroy a biosphere that has been in development for billions of years, or a world that is intended to be here for hundreds of thousands to millions of years to come as a place for the development of intelligent life and enlightenment.
There have always been two space programs. There is the conventional space program that my uncle worked in. He was the senior project engineer with Grumman designing the lunar module, using jet thrusters etc.
A parallel space program exists using more advanced technologies, including early anti-gravity spacecraft capable of going faster than the speed of light.
But Earth is under a type of cosmic quarantine. It is known that we are not yet socially and spiritually evolved enough to go into space with such advanced technologies - and so our wings are clipped for now. The key to our being welcome in the cosmos is peace.
There are entire worlds that don't even have a concept of war that are highly developed and are at or beyond our level of technological achieve- ment. So a world like ours would be enormously risky to turn loose on the cosmos; we are just still too violent and primitive.
Our ability to utilize all the technologies we have developed covertly has been truncated by extraterrestrial enforcement of a type of quarantine. They are charged with protecting the universe from a species whose technologies have way outstripped their social and spiritual development. This is manifest universal justice. It would be the height of insanity and folly to turn militaristic humans loose on the cosmos!
Neil Armstrong was over-heard saying as we landed on the moon, there were numerous extraterrestrial vehicles on the crater, watching us and that we were essentially warned off the moon.
Now think about it. During the height of the cold war, the space program was really a military asset: It was a race to the moon competitively with the Soviets, and plans were in place to put military assets on the moon. The extraterrestrial people do not want us carving up other worlds into "us versus them," territories, thus exporting human conflict into space. It will not be allowed.