“Cough. No!”
(The first time this “No!” was played in court, every journalist and member of the public burst out laughing. Judge Rivlin threatened to clear the court.)
“I don’t think it’s Paris,” he said.
“Cough.”
“I don’t think it’s Athens.”
No cough.
“I’m sure it’s not Rome.”
No cough.
“I would have thought it’s Berlin but there’s a chance it’s Paris,” said Charles. “Think, think! I think it’s Berlin. It could be Paris. I think it’s Paris.”
“Cough.”
“Yes,” said Charles. “I am going to play . . .”
Now Nicholas Hilliard asks Charles why he changed his mind and opted for Paris.
“I knew that Paris was a planned city,” explains Charles. “The center of Paris was cleared of slums during the nineteenth century, and it was rebuilt into districts and boulevards. Prominent in my mind was the economic reason. In the middle of the nineteenth century France was coming out of the Revolutionary period and it was decided, I think by Napoleon III, that he would concentrate on Paris and thereby the remainder of France would flourish.”
Charles looks hopefully at the jury. “But at the time,” sighs Hilliard, “you said you thought it was Berlin because he had a German-sounding name.”
There is a silence.
“Oh, Mr. Ingram,” says Hilliard. “Surely you can help us a little bit better than that.”
Judge Rivlin calls for a break. We all file out to the corridor. Charles looks shaken. He lights a cigarillo. I notice he’s wearing a Mensa badge. He put it on as a special touch, but it is so tiny—just a little M on his lapel—that the jury surely can’t spot it.
“Hilliard has got me all tied up in knots,” he says. “I just don’t want to say anything stupid.” I do an upbeat smile, even though I believe that only a miracle can save them now.
“How does it feel to have to keep watching that tape?” I ask. I imagine it must be embarrassing. From the tape they look quite extraordinarily guilty, albeit in a sweet and funny way. It seems such a slapstick-type crime—a half-baked plot executed badly.
“I still get a thrill,” Charles replies, “when it gets to the part where I win a million.”
Corridors outside courtrooms are exciting places. The players all stand together smoking cigarettes—defendants, barristers, clerks, ushers, solicitors, journalists, police, and victims—as if there’s a victim in this crime! Celador, the makers of Millionaire, has signed up almost every witness for a documentary to be shown across the world after the verdict. This will, of course, earn them far more than the million pounds they say Charles almost cheated out of them. Sometimes I think that whoever masterminded this harebrained plot should be given a cut of Celador’s documentary profits. I wonder who the criminal genius was. I don’t think it was Charles.
The only major players who’ve not been signed up by Celador are the defendants. Three thousand journalists have approached the Ingrams for interviews. Although I am way ahead, being a close family friend, I note that many other reporters have their own ingratiating tactics, and I’m not resting on my laurels. On Day One, for example, Charles entered court and gave his solicitors a kind of victory salute: a punch in the air. Half a dozen journalists, me included, thought he was punching the air at us, so we performed slightly awkward victory salutes back. It was a little embarrassing.
A few feet down the corridor, the reporters gather in a circle, comparing notes. “I liked it when Charles said the charges were ‘absolute rot,’” says one journalist. “Do you think we can get away with having him say ‘tommyrot’?” says another. Everyone laughs.
It is agreed that Hilliard is a brilliantly scathing cross-examiner. A passing barrister on his way to Court 5 tells me that Hilliard “trounced me in a murder trial once.” I didn’t think to ask him whether the convicted murderer did it or not.
Tecwen Whittock sits far down the corridor, sometimes alone, sometimes with his son, Rhys. He’s so unassuming that I never once see him enter the dock. He just seems to materialize. I wander over to him.
“I’m from Cardiff too,” I say.
“That’s a coincidence,” he says.
“And my mother went to Howell’s,” I say.
Howell’s is the private school Tecwen sent his daughter to, running up a £20,000 bill. This debt, say the prosecutors, was Tecwen’s motive.
“See?” says Tecwen. “That’s another coincidence. Coincidences do happen!”
“I was at prep school with Adrian and Marcus Pollock,” I say.
“That’s another coincidence!” says Tecwen. “I’d like to see what Hilliard would do to you, with all those coincidences, if he got you on the stand.”
I don’t tell Tecwen the fourth coincidence—that Judge Rivlin is a distant cousin of my mother’s.
I wander down the corridor to talk to the arresting officers. “Is this trial really worth it?” I ask Detective Sergeant Ian Williamson. “I mean, come on, in the end, what exactly did they do? Why didn’t Celador just settle their differences with the Ingrams in a civil court?”
This is the worst question you can ask an arresting officer. They hate ambiguities. The police have a lot to lose if this trial goes badly for them. Some of the arresting officers were Paul Burrell’s arresting officers. They really need a success after that fiasco.
“This trial,” Williamson replies, crisply, “is about protecting the integrity of the Millionaire format. Millionaire is the most popular quiz show in the history of television. Celador has sold it to a hundred countries. Thousands of jobs depend on its success. . . .”
This is true. In fact, a BBC reporter down the corridor has just returned from Jordan, where she was meeting Palestinian leaders. They asked her why she was going back to Britain. “It’s to do with a quiz show called Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?” she said. The Palestinian leaders got really excited and said, “The Coughing Major! You’re going to that trial?”
So I understand what Williamson means, but another thought occurs to me. The prize money Charles allegedly tried to cheat out of Celador came from the revenue generated from the premium-rate phone lines—the calls the viewers make in their frequently fruitless attempts to get on to the show. So it is revenue generated from the far-fetched hopes and dreams of the viewing public, which seems like a cheat in itself. And how much is this trial costing? The answer is around a million pounds. If there’s a guilty verdict, we the viewing public stand to lose a million pounds. If there’s a not-guilty verdict, Celador will be forced to give Charles his check back.
“Watching that cross-examination has taught me,” I say to Detective Sergeant Williamson, “if I’m ever in a situation like that, I’m going to plead guilty.”
There is a small silence.
“Proper criminals do,” he replies.
Every morning sees a scrum for the public-gallery seats. I secure my place each day because I arrive an hour early and I don’t budge, even though I often very much need the toilet. Charles’s father, himself an army man, sits next to me. He wears a tiepin shaped like a steam train. Unyielding pensioners with flasks of coffee mercilessly nab most of the other seats. One regular keeps passing me notes. I tend to open them with great anticipation. It is exciting to be handed a note in a courtroom. Today’s note reads: “Is your suit made out of corduroy?”
The pensioners spend much of the day noisily unwrapping packets of Lockets and readjusting their screeching hearing aids. A young man behind me cracks his knuckles from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Each time the barristers mention the word “cough”—and the word “cough” is mentioned very frequently—many people sitting around me involuntarily cough. We are like a comedy-club audience, determined to enjoy ourselves even if the comedian isn’t very funny. Even Chris Tarrant’s reading of the oath gets a loud chuckle from a man behind me.