Выбрать главу

TN

82

Recent angina. Procidentia/lives

alone/incontinent (failed pessary)

TL

28

Laparoscopy for pain, previous laparotomy

(twice)

JB

22

Secondary subfertility – 3 years. Previous

ectopic

Examiner’s information

Waiting list for operations

Name

Age

Details

Operation and logical action

Venue

Special needs

Priority

JA

28

Deep dyspareunia, menorrhagia ovarian cyst

Hysteroscopy and laparoscopic

Day unit

Soon

(8 cm) (scan suggests benign cyst)

ovarian cystectomy

AB

42

Large pelvic mass. Likely ovarian cyst

Laparotomy. Consultant must

In-patient

Urgent

CA125 = 45 IU/mL

be present

JF

18

Recent abnormal smear. Cervical biopsy CIN3.

LLETZ

Day unit

Soon

Requests treatment under GA

PH

30

P3+1. Recent TOP. History of subacute-bacterial Laparoscopic sterilization,

Day unit

Soon

endocarditis and DVT. Wishes laparoscopic

antibiotic cover, anticoagulant

sterilization

PR

18

Primary amenorrhoea/cyclical pain. Ultrasound

Incise hymen

Day unit

Urgent

– distended vagina

KR

32

P5+0. Missing IUCD. Caring for invalid child

Laparoscopy? Proceed laparotomy

In-patient, but home

Good notice

Soon

(IUCD in abdominal cavity)

(consultant)

same day if possible

QT

44

Fibroid uterus. Menorrhagia. Haemoglobin 8.1,

LHRH analogues, iron tablets,

In-patient

Soon

Jehovah’s Witness

embolization, subtotal hysterectomy

TN

82

Recent angina (failed pessary). Procidentia/lives Vaginal hysterectomy, needs

In-patient

Arrange

Soon

alone/incontinent

preoperative assessment

postoperative care

TL

28

Laparoscopy for pain, previous laparotomy

Laparoscopy (consultant present)

In-patient

Warn re. risk

Routine

(twice)

of bowel damage

JB

22

Secondary subfertility – 3 years. Previous ectopic Laparoscopy dye, endometrial biopsy Day unit

Routine

OPERATING LIST – PRIORITIZATION

Mark sheet

Discuss each case briefly with regard to:

1. Logical action (operation and others)

2. Venue of proposed treatment

3. Special needs

4. Priority assignment

Global score

JA

0

1

2

3

4

AB

0

1

2

3

4

JF

0

1

2

3

4

PH

0

1

2

3

4

PR

0

1

2

3

4

KR

0

1

2

3

4

QT

0

1

2

3

4

TN

0

1

2

3

4

TL

0

1

2

3

4

JB

0

1

2

3

4

Totaclass="underline"

/40 divide by 2

Final mark

/20

85

CIRCUIT A

Extra notes

The answers are not clear-cut so one needs to confirm that there is a common-sense approach, and this should be reflected in the global score for each case.

AB – it should be clear that a consultant must be present for this operation.

KR – this operation might be successfully done laparoscopically but if this proves impossible, a laparotomy may be necessary. The operative arrange-ments should reflect this, so it may be best to admit her as an in-patient on the understanding that, if a laparotomy proves unnecessary, she might go home on the same day. The special needs arrangement for the care of her invalid child would have to reflect the ‘worst’ scenario. Does she need the operation at all?

QT – the operation could include either TAH or subtotal TAH (not myomectomy). The candidate should discuss the preoperative treatment of the anaemia and the prerequisite of a normal blood count prior to surgery.

Although oral iron may be sufficient, the discussion should also include hormonal ovarian suppression if this fails. The special operation consent form is best done prior to admission.

TN – the use of anaesthetic preoperative assessment should be discussed.

TL – this patient is best admitted as an in-patient because of the possibility of bowel damage during laparoscopy. She should be warned of this risk.

JB – is this appropriate? Will need Chlamydia screening and prophylaxis.

JA – check CA125.

PH – mirena inserted under antibiotic cover may be a safer option.

86

Circuit A, Station 8

Bereavement

Candidate’s instructions

Mrs Tina Shoe was a 26-year-old primigravida who presented to the labour ward with a 24-hour history of decreased fetal movements at 39 weeks’ gestation. At that time her general observations were normal. Unfortunately the fetal heart could not be heard and an intrauterine fetal death was confirmed by ultrasound scan.

The pregnancy had been classed as ‘low risk’ and antenatal care provided by the community midwife and the GP. She had considered a home delivery. She was a bit of a worrier and had experienced some abdominal pain and had a CTG 24 hours prior to admission. At the time this was reported as normal, but on review it was less than optimal. She had been sent home.

Following the diagnosis of fetal demise, labour was induced and after 12 hours Mrs Shoe delivered a 2.3 kg macerated stillborn male infant with the cord wrapped tightly around the neck. The patient’s postnatal course was a little stormy, as her blood pressure was quite labile, rising to 140/100 with 2+ proteinuria. This settled after 36–48 hours.

At this station you will meet Mrs Shoe’s husband, who has come to see you 6 weeks after the event. His wife is physically well but has gone to stay with her mother in Bournemouth. The husband is very angry and is demanding an explanation for the death of his son.

Postmortem has shown an anatomically normal male infant weighing 2.3 kg. All fetal and maternal investigations were normal.

MARKS WILL BE AWARDED FOR YOUR ABILITY TO DEAL WITH A DIFFICULT SITUATION AND TO COUNSEL AN ANGRY BEREAVED

PERSON

87

CIRCUIT A

Role-player’s instructions

You are Mr Shoe and work as a window cleaner. You are at your wits end. Your wife has had a stillborn baby and she blames herself for it. She is a worrier and continued to smoke throughout the pregnancy but only 10 cigarettes/day. She has had to go to her mother’s house, as she cannot cope at home when you are out at work.

This event has put a real strain on the marriage and you feel she may never try for a baby again in case the same thing happens. Certainly sex is out of the question at the moment so you have to relieve yourself and you are getting fed up with it.

You cannot understand how this happened as the pregnancy had been considered low risk and you had even thought about a home delivery. You want to know if the midwife and GP did not provide the appropriate care. The baby seemed very small and you can’t understand why that wasn’t picked up – after all, she seemed to be down at the antenatal clinic for hours at a time. Why hadn’t she had more scans?