Circumcision means “being a Jew,” either by birth or conversion, but that genealogical connection to Abraham counts for nothing now that the new creation has come. However, as was the case with male and female, or slave and free, the problem that Paul and his adherents faced was that Jews and Judaism did not disappear with the coming of Christ. Far from it. The Temple in Jerusalem continued as Judaism’s center, the Torah was honored and observed, Jewish learning flourished, and there were synagogues in every major city and town throughout the Roman Empire. Even those Jews who accepted Jesus as Messiah never imagined that this implied they should cease to practice their Jewish faith or that the coming of Jesus redefined the Jewish people. Jesus himself had lived as an observant Jew. His brother James was known for his piety and devotion to the Torah.
James and the Jerusalem apostles would have agreed with Paul on many points but the Jewish people were still Israel, the Torah remained valid “until heaven and earth passed away,” and God alone was to be worshipped, with none beside him. Jesus had not come to destroy the Torah. He had upheld even the “least” of its commandments.
FOLLOWING THE TORAH OF CHRIST
Paul finds himself caught between two worlds and cannot resist operating, even as a Jew, as if the old world has already passed away and been replaced by the new creation. He adopts a situational stance that was difficult to characterize, since he believed that whether one lived as a Jew or as a Gentile was a matter of indifference to one in Christ. He offers this surprisingly candid assessment of his own approach to Jews as well as Gentiles:
To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win over Jews; to those under the Torah I became as one under the Torah—though not myself under the Torah—that I might win those under the Torah. To those outside the Torah [i.e., Gentiles], I became as one outside the Torah—not being without “Torah” to God, but under the Torah of Christ—that I might win those outside the Torah. (1 Corinthians 9:20–21)10
Paul says here that all of those in Christ, whether Jew or Gentile, are under a new Law or Torah—the Law of Christ. He clearly has no written code in mind, so what is this Law of Christ—what are its precepts and contents and what does it mean to be under its jurisdiction? The answer is quite surprising.
Paul believed that Gentiles, who he says are “outside the Torah,” were not part of the special covenant God made with the nation of Israel and thus had no formally written Law. He also agreed with the rabbis who taught that the nations of the world were still morally responsible for a minimum set of universal human ethics that had been revealed to Noah as the father of the entire human race after the Flood. These “Noahide” laws were variously enumerated in Jewish sources, both before and after the time of Jesus, but they included prohibitions against idolatry, sexual immorality, murder, stealing, cruelty to animals, and eating blood, as well as positive injunctions to honor parents and practice social justice, including loving one’s neighbor.11 Like other Jews of his time, Paul considered all humankind morally responsible to God as Creator through the gift of reason and the natural law revealed by one’s conscience. Paul believed that Gentiles had no excuse for turning from worship of the Creator to worshipping the forces of nature. He writes the Romans:
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened . . . they changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. (Romans 1:20–23)
This is a common Jewish polemic against the Gentile world and what was viewed as their willful foolishness in turning to idols. Paul follows here, almost word for word, the thoughts of the author of the Wisdom of Solomon, a first-century B.C. Jewish text now included in the Apocrypha:12
For all people who were ignorant of God were foolish by nature; and they were unable from the good things that are seen to know the one who exists, nor did they recognize the artisan while paying heed to his works . . . Yet again, not even they are to be excused; for if they had the power to know so much [about science] they could find sooner the one who made these things. (Wisdom 13:1, 9)
The author of the Wisdom of Solomon goes on to argue that “the idea of making idols was the beginning of sexual immorality,” which then led to all other sins, and Paul follows his chain of thought precisely, offering a long litany of Gentile vices:
For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another . . . being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, unmercifuclass="underline" who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practice such things are worthy of death. (Romans 1:26–32)
According to Paul, God’s general principle of judgment will be to hold Jews, who are “under the Law,” responsible for what the Law demands, while holding Gentiles, who are “without the Law,” responsible for the law “written in their hearts,” with their conscience either accusing or excusing them accordingly (Romans 2:12–16).
There is nothing in Paul’s position as expressed here in the opening chapters of Romans that is antithetical to Judaism. The rabbis of Paul’s day would have agreed with his essential points regarding the sinfulness of both Jews and Gentiles and God’s righteous judgment of all humanity.
In his letters Paul frequently offers a basic moral catalogue of prohibited activities, insisting quite adamantly that his followers live up to such minimal standards of moral behavior:
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those receiving sodomy, nor those committing sodomy, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. (1 Corinthians 6:9–11)
That is why Paul is so outraged when he receives the report that one of the brothers at Corinth is living with his father’s wife, apparently his stepmother—a kind of sexual immorality, he says, that is “not even found among the Gentiles” (1 Corinthians 5:1–5). Paul demands that the man be expelled immediately from the congregation in a formal ceremony that would deliver him back to Satan—a kind of reverse baptism, so that he is no longer considered in Christ.
Sexual immorality (Greek porneia), along with idolatry, and eating blood, seemed to be the three points of the Noahide laws that presented the most difficulties for Gentile God-fearers—whether Christian or not. Prohibitions against murder, stealing, and injustice, as well as honor of parents, would be upheld in Greco-Roman culture as much as among the Jews, so they were not matters of dispute. But what did it mean to “turn from idols”? It was understood that one would no longer worship at a temple of one of the dozens of Greco-Roman gods, but what about ancillary activities such as eating meat sold in the marketplace that had been sacrificed to a pagan god, or attending a festival connected to one of the gods as part of a civic celebration? Sexual immorality was defined much more broadly within Judaism as well. Prostitution, homosexuality, and sex of any kind before or outside marriage were considered sinful and broadly categorized as porneia. Eating blood was almost inevitable, since the techniques of butchering animals used in Greco-Roman society did not include the elaborate Jewish measures to remove all blood from the flesh. In fact, animals were often strangled and hung up in the meat market with all the blood and organs intact. Those living a strict Jewish life would consider all such behavior as unrighteous and they would expect God-fearers to do so as well.