“Not likely, Constable. There is an element of chance in these matters. You should put it out of your mind, for you have conducted yourself well, particularly in handling that crowd of rowdies before we came. I commend you.”
Then did Sir John turn in my direction. “Jeremy, I must send you and Mr. Brede for Mr. Donnelly. You have visited his new surgery. Can you find it?”
“I’m sure I can, sir.”
“Then you and Mr. Brede must find a stable open at this hour, get a wagon, and rouse Mr. Donnelly. This poor woman is not for the Raker.”
“I know just such a place on Half Moon Street,” volunteered Mr. Brede.
“Then go, both of you. I shall remain with Mr. Bailey. Send Bailey back to me with any potential witnesses he may deem worthy of interrogation.”
“We’ll be back as soon as ever we can,” said I.
Mr. Brede said nothing and would continue saying nothing until we reached the stable. He did, however, point his club threateningly at the drunken man, as we passed him by, as if to say. Remain exactly where you are. The unfortunate man, whom I took to be under arrest, was sitting where he had fallen. He stared back at us, blank and befuddled.
The next time that I saw the fellow was in Sir John’s courtroom at Number 4 Bow Street. He had been taken in by Mr. Bailey, as I understood, after they had finished a canvass of buildings and houses nearby which had yielded nothing; none who slept near the gates had been awakened by cries; the woman, whose true name was yet unknown, had been murdered in silence.
Sir John had fared better. Four of the women brought to him by Mr. Bailey had information to give — yet all gave similar information. Each was allowed separately to view the victim’s face (though not the horrible wounds on her trunk); each identified her only as “Polly” though one said the woman was known in St. Martin’s Lane as “Tuppence Poll,” for having sold herself for so little when she was greatly in need. All but one had heard of her fierce argument with a “foreigner”; only one had actually been witness to it, and her name was Sarah Linney. Two said that he was a Jew named Yossel and described him as a “high-ripper” — the sort of thief who robbed prostitutes of their earnings, often at knife-point. They were greatly incensed and certain he had murdered their sister, Polly; all said they feared for their own lives.
As for myself, after assisting in the delivery of the corpus to Mr. Donnelly’s surgery, I returned with Sir John to Bow Street. There, to my disappointment, I was sent up by him to perform my usual household duties. It was then but seven in the morning, and Annie Oakum and Lady Fielding were sitting at breakfast in the kitchen when I entered. They jumped from the table eager to know all about the matter that had taken Sir John and me away before dawn. Their questions put me in an awkward state. He had cautioned me to say nothing of what I had seen or heard. “Not even to Lady Fielding?” I had asked him. “Perhaps especially not to her,” he had replied. So what was I to say when they came asking to know details of every sort? I allowed only that Sir John had been called to begin a homicide inquiry. (It seemed safe to say that, for nothing short of such a homicide would have brought him out at such an hour.) They were, of course, not satisfied with that and continued to question most vigorously. At last, I threw up my hands and told Lady Fielding and Annie that they must ask Sir John if they wanted to know more, for he had instructed me to say nothing. They took it as a challenge. Lady Fielding told Annie to do the buying in Covent Garden that day and find out all she could on the street; whilst she would make inquiries at the Magdalene Home for Penitent Prostitutes — news from the outside always seemed to find its way there. For me — I took it as a form of punishment for my silence — there was more scrubbing to be done. Since I had recently given a shine to the stairs, I was condemned to do the same to the floors of the kitchen, our little-used dining room, and the sitting room as well.
After breakfast, which I quite devoured so hungry was I, I went quickly to my task. Lady Fielding left. Annie went out and returned (pleasing me with her report that she had learned little but that the victim was a woman). All the while I worked with great enterprise. Whilst I was in no wise fond of scrubbing and such like, I was well practiced at it and knew that if I pleased myself with the job I did, I should certainly please Lady Fielding. Thus I managed to finish not long after noon, at which time I made straight for the stairs and, descending to Sir John’s courtroom, I went to wait until I might learn more of the progress of the inquiry.
I opened the door quietly and just as quietly found a seat near the door. As I settled myself, I found Sir John concluding with a case of disputation between a Covent Garden merchant and a builder. From the little I heard, I concluded that the builder had erected a permanent stall, of which there were an increasing number in the Garden, that the stall had subsequently collapsed in the first heavy rainstorm, ruining not only the structure but a full day’s supply of fruits and vegetables, as well.
I quote Sir John’s judgment, for I have it still very well in my mind. May he forgive me if I have a word or two wrong:
“While the defendant has argued for himself ingeniously indeed, I cannot but believe that there is something specious in his argument that since no other buildings collapsed during the storm in question, the collapse of the stall constitutes an Act of God. He has even gone so far as to suggest that this calamity was visited upon the plaintiff as a punishment for his sins. There, Mr. Beaton, I believe you overstep yourself, for it is not up to us to judge the sins of others, unless they be so flagrant as to be considered criminal in nature — and then, only unless we be jurymen at trial. And just as you go too far there, you go not far enough in your understanding of what constitutes an Act of God. Under the law, this term of divine agency refers to an event that occurs without human intervention or participation — a great flood or a great wind, or the like. Since there was no flood and the wind that blew was of no particular consequence, we cannot attribute the collapse of the stall to such natural causes; and since I would not presume to be privy to the plaintiff’s relation to his Creator, then we are left with your own faulty workmanship as the only possible cause for the collapse of the stall. That is how I rule — in favor of the plaintiff. Therefore, I obligate you, Mr. Beaton, to build a new stall for Mr. Grimes, one to his satisfaction that will stand a minimum of, let us say, five years — barring an Act of God, of course. You must also pay him the sum of five pounds for his loss of stock and custom. If you fail in carrying out this court’s directives — well, sir, that is worth a stay in Newgate. Am I understood? Yea or nay?”
Mr. Beaton was beaten. He hung his head and answered with a docile, “Yes, sir, understood.”
“So be it.” Sir John clapped down his mallet, which did him for a gavel, and called forth, “Next case.”
(Reader, I quote thus at length as an example of the lessons I learned in Sir John Fielding’s Bow Street Court long before I began formally to read the law with him. In this instance, of course, I was never to forget what it was that legally constituted an Act of God.)
“Thaddeus Millhouse, come forward,” bellowed Mr. Marsden in full voice.
Then Sir John conferred a moment with his clerk, listened attentively, then nodded. As he did so, a small man rose in a manner most diffident and measured off the five or six paces which brought him before the magistrate. I recognized him as the drunken man who had fallen before Constable Brede.
“Thaddeus Millhouse, you have been detained for disobeying my order to leave the alley which leads from St. Paul’s churchyard to Bedford Street. Since I gave the order, and Constable Brede who put you under arrest had a long, hard night of it, I have dispensed with his presence. I am well enough acquainted with the circumstances of this matter. So you must tell me, Mr. Millhouse, what have you to say in your defense?”