V. P. Kin in Lit�ratura i mark1izm, vol. 6 (Moscow, I 9z9), pp. 7 I-I I6;
L. V. Pumpyansky, '0111y i J�ti. lstoriko-literatumyi ocherk', in I� S.
Turgenev, Sochin�niya (Moscow/Leningrad, I939), vol. 6, pp. 167-86; I. K.
lppolit, unin D Turg�ntfl� (Moscow, I93.f.); I. I. Veksler, /. s. Turg�ntfl ;
politichukay• 6or'6a JAtJtituJyatyk!t goJIJfJ (Moscow/Leningrad, 1 93 5); V. A.
Arkhipov, in Ruukaya lituatura, 1958 No I, pp. I 3z-6:z; G. A. Byaly, in
NIJfJyi mir, Moscow, I958 No 8, pp. :z5 5-9; A. I. Batyuto, in /. 8. Turg�nto
(I8I8-I883-I958): Jtat'i i mat�rialy (Orel, I96o), pp. 77-95; P. G.
Pustovoit, Roman /. 8. Turg�ntoa Otllly i deti i iJtinaya 6or' 6a 6okh godot:J
XIX r;da (Moscow, 1 96o); N. Chernov in Yopro1y lit�ratury, Moscow,
1961 No 8, pp. I 88-93; William Egerton in Ruukaya lit�ratura, I967 No I,
PP· I49-54·
This represents a mere sample of the continuing controversy, in which
Lenin's scathing reference to the similarity of Turgenev's views to those
of German right-wing social democrats is constantly quoted both for and
against the conception of Bazarov as a prototype of Bolshevik activists. There
is an even more extensive mass of writing on the question of whether, and
how far, Katkov managed to persuade Turgenev to amend his tert in a
'moderate' direction by darkening Bazarov's image. That Turgenev did
alter his text as a result of Katkov's pleading is certain; he may, however,
286
FATH ERS AND C H I LDREN
T urgenev was upset and bewildered by the reception of his book.
Before sending it to the printer, he had taken his usual precaution of
seeking endless advice. He read the manuscript to friends in Paris, he
altered, he modi lied, he tried to please everyone. The figure of Bazarov
suffered several transformations in successive drafts, up and down the
moral scale as this or that friend or consultant reported his impressions.
The attack from the left inflicted wounds which festered for the rest
of his life. Years later he wrote 'I am told that I am on the side of
the "fathers"- I, who in the person of Pavel Kirsanov, actually sinned
against artistic truth, went too far, exaggerated his defects to the point
of travesty, and made him ridiculous !'1 As for Bazarov, he was
'honest, truthful, a democrat to his fingertips'.1 Many years later,
Turgenev told the anarchist Kropotkin that he loved Bazarov 'very,
very much . . . I will show you my diaries-you will see how I wept
when I ended the book with Bazarov's death.'8 'Tell me honestly,'
he wrote to one of his most caustic critics, the satirist Saltykov (who
complained that the word 'nihilist' was used by reactionaries to damn
anyone they did not like), 'how could anybody be offended by being
compared to Bazarov? Do you not yourself realise that he is the most
sympathetic of all my characters�'' As for 'nihilism', that, perhaps,
was a mistake. 'I am ready to admit . . . that I had no right to give
our reactionary scum the opportunity to seize on a name, a catchword;
the writer in me should have brought the sacrifice to the citizen- I
admit the justice of my rejection by the young and of all the gibes
hurled at me . . . The issue was more important than artistic truth,
have restored some, at any rate, of the original language when the novel was
published as a book. His relations with Katkov deteriorated rapidly; Turgenev
came to look on him as a vicious reactionary and refused his proffered hand
at a banquet in honour of Pushkin in I 88o; one of his favourite habits was
to refer to the arthritis which tormented him as Katkovitis (AatlOfl.fa). On
this see N. M. Gutyar, lrJtlfl Strguviclz TurgtflttJ (Yurev, 1907), and V. G.
Bazanov, /z littraturtloi poltmiAi 6oAh godOfl (Petrozavodsk, 1 94I), pp. 46-8.
The list of 'corrections' in the text for which Katkov is held responsible is
ritually reproduced in virtually every Soviet study of Turgenev's works. But
see also A. Batyuto, 'Parizhskaya rukopis' romana I. S. Turgeneva Ottsy i
tkti', RussAaya littratura, 1 961 No 4o pp. 57-78.
1 Littralurtlyt i z.hiltisAit tJospomiflafliya, p. I S S.
t Letter to K. K. Sluchevsky, :z6 April I 86:z.
a /. S. TurgtflttJ fJ tJospomiflafliyaAII SOtJrtflltflfliAOtJ, vol. I, p. 441 .
• Letter to M . E . Saltykov-Shchedrin, I S January I 876.
•'
2.87
R U S S I AN T H IN K E R S
and I ought to have foreseen this. '1 He claimed that he shared almost
all Bazarov's views, all save those on art. 1 A lady of his acquaintance
had told him that he was neither for the fathers, nor for the children,
but was a nihilist himself; he thought she might be right. 8 Herun
had said that there had been something of Bazarov in them all, in
himself, in Belinsky, in Bakunin, in all those who in the I 84os
denounced the Russian kingdom of darkness in the name of the west
and science and civilisation.' Turgenev did not deny this either. He
did, no doubt, adopt a different tone in writing to different correspondents. When radical Russian students in Heidelberg demanded clarification of his own position, he told them that 'if the reader does not love Bazarov, as he is-coarse, heartless, ruthlessly dry and brusque • . . the
fault is mine; I have not succeeded in my task. But to "dip him in
syrup" (to use his own expression)-that I was not prepared to do . . . I
did not wish to buy popularity by this sort of concession. Better lose a
battle (and I think I have lost this one), than win it by a trick.'11 Yet
to his friend the poet Fet, a conservative landowner, he wrote that he
did not himself know if he loved Bazarov or hated him. Did he mean
to praise or denigrate him? He did not know.8 And this is echoed
eight years later: 'My pei'S(Jnal feelings [towards Bazarov] were
confused (God only knows whether I loved him or hated him) !'7 To
the liberal Madame Filosofova he wrote, 'Bazarov is my beloved child;
on his account I quarrelled with Katkov . . . Bazarov, that intelligent,
heroic man-a caricature? !' And he added that this was 'a senseless
charge'.8
He found the scorn of the young unjust beyond endurance. He
wrote that in the summer of I 862 'despicable generals praised me, the
young insulted me'. 8 The socialist leader Lavrov reports that he bitterly
complained to him of the injustice of the radicals' change of attitude
towards him. He returns to this in one of his late Ponns in Prost:
'Honest souls turned away from him. Honest faces grew red with
1 ibid.
1 Liltrotumyt i zhittis �it rJospDmittoniyo, p. 1 55.
8 ibid., P· I 57.
' 'Eshche raz Bazarov', 8o6ronit sochintnii, vo]. zo, pp. 3 3 5-50.
6 Letter to K. K. Sluchevsky, z6 April I 86z.
8 Letter of 1 8 April I 86z.
7 Letter to I. P. Borisov, 4 January I 87o.
8 Letter of 30 August I 874.
11 Letter to Marko Vovchok (Mme Markovich}, z7 August I 8liz.
288
FATHERS AND C H ILDREN
indignation at the mere mention of his name. '1 This was not mere
wounded amour propre: He suffered from a genuine sense of having
got himself into a politically false position. All his life he wished to
march with the progressives, with the party ofliberty and protest. But,