Holmes took the paper and began to examine it thoroughly. Then he turned it over and looked at the backside. The phone number of some firm called BCL – 311-1488 caught his eyes. Holmes noticed for himself that the combination of ciphers was similar to the number of “Chas Pick” issue 151(880) by October 14, 1997. He also drew his attention on the word “Грабли”[55] (it was a title of some small comic story), asked Andrew to translate it and only after it returned to the pictures of the “picnics”.
Mr. Verov, you’ve told of the “birds” drawn at the third “picnic”, as if they were the kamikaze-airplanes. What grounds do you have for such interpretation of this “feathered” symbolism, except the fact that airplanes fly as well as birds? – Holmes asked Andrew.
Well, Mr. Holmes, – Andrew continued. – I’ll try to tell you my version of the third puzzle solution taking into account my understanding of the matrix methods of ruling I’ve already told earlier. I’m not interested in its author’s name or the technology of their creation. I take these three “picnics” as the matrix-scenarios of possible events in Russia and the World. The realization probability of them is determined not so much by the symbols they consist of as by people minds condition, which takes place in the modern society. I sincerely believe God[56] and live in a permanent attempt to have a talk with the Almighty, who only doesn’t make any mistake in any case. The morality for me is not a relative thing, as cultural workers use to tell to people, but it is substantially determined, i.e. I consider the morality to be absolute and same for everybody: for people and for God too. The difference is that God Himself has established moral “standards” called the “righteousness” for Him, but for people these criteria are the ideal the should aim at in any circumstances. Thus is my attitude to all events, including tragic as well. In the modern society all is going in the best way in view of the objective (and far from righteous) morality that people have. This means that everything could be much worse ore better depending on how far does the real people’s morality deviate from or how near does it approach to the righteousness ideals, established by the Almighty.
What thoughts had he, who created this puzzle, what morality does he have – all of this is his own problems. He is responsible for them to God. The much more important is the reaction of people whose subconscious psychical levels got these pictures. With all this I of course mean the conscious, sensible reaction, which mostly is expressed in certain words. And now imagine that these pictures appeared before the look of half million Leningrad-Petersburg inhabitants. How do you think, during the two years between first and third “picnics” has just the city’s name changing change somehow the psyche of its inhabitants, their attitude to events in Moscow, in Russia at whole, in the world? I think that it has. Though, the majority of people don’t even think of this.
Well, what do we see at the pictures of the “Post Historical Picnic”? First of all the two main symbols of Russia: Kremlin’s Spasskaya tower and Vasily Blazhenny’s cathedral’s cupola, i.e. the symbols of the temporal and spiritual powers. On the right from them the “birds” fly, and their direction marked with the arrow is beyond any doubts. I won’t talk about the day’s length (7.52) corresponding to every January 20 on Moscow’s longitude, since you, Holmes, are well informed about it, as I could understand.
Yes, we discussed it with my friend Watson in London on September 22, when I left to Zurich. Moreover in Liechtenstein on a villa in Vaduz one of your compatriots has shown me the “History’s password” on the teeth of the fellow with an axe. After it I understood why the acts of terrorism took place on September 11, on the day “John the Baptiser’s Decapitation”. But I still wonder why do the “birds” associate to the planes?
He, who showed you the “History’s password” – an axe, which is really useful for John the Baptiser’s tragedy causes understanding (though he himself provoked this tragedy) – seemingly doesn’t know that this person’s face is similar to the cartoon of the last USSR Minister of Defence – Marshal Yevgeny Shaposhnikov.
— As I know, Marshal Dmitri Yazov was the last Minister of Defence who joined GKChP in August 1991, – interrupted Paolo.
You’re right, Paolo. Yazov really was the last Minister of Defence before the Putsch. But immediately after it the General Secretary Gorbachev returned from Foros and appointed Air General Shaposhnikov to be the last USSR Minister of Defence, after what he gave him a rank of marshal. So the air force was to play the role of blind axe cutting down the towers in Moscow or in New York. The last depended on where the ruling matrix would turn. At least in 1992 this climber and upstart dealt the finishing blows to the Soviet Army that even after the great power’s destruction was still strong and unified, and thus were very dangerous for the West and for the USSR and Russia partition as well. And who knows, may be under other circumstances he could do much more evil. And somebody else on his place could save the armed forces unity and the unity of the state and we’d have another history…
Well, let’s continue. When I was talking of the matrix methods of ruling explained by my friend from Russia I told, that when some alternative conception of ruling appears however all matrix symbols and images remain unchanged. And all the evil planned in matrix-scenario can be realized but towards those who has planned it.
So do you think that God is unable to clear the adversarial matrixes from evil? – Asked Paolo again.
That, what is called God’s Providence, always shows itself in the mutually enclosed matrixes action. It’s harder to understand how it happens. Any matrix is filled by people’s thoughts consisting of images and their own energetic. Thoughts could be vicious or righteous and are the reflection of people’s sense of proportion. Vicious thoughts could be expressed by righteous words, but this doesn’t make them righteous. American government wanted to punish Iraq and Yugoslavia but told about the charity and mercy. Kamikaze terrorists wanted to punish America and told about the righteous retribution. Today the USA is going to punish the terrorists and carry out an anti-terrorist operation against Afghanistan with a code name “Operation Infinite Justice”. Though, it was their own words that fifteen of nineteen terrorists were Saudi nationals. This words: justice, revenge, mercy are understood as something good and righteous. I mean that the good and righteousness of any thoughts is expressed not by words, but by deeds instead. “…He is not the God of disorder but of peace[57]”. This Gospel’s phrase tells that God isn’t somehow connected to people’s evil. He wished the good dominated between people. But he gave the right of choose to people. And it means that a human (if he is human indeed) should exterminate the evil between humans himself. This way the Almighty can use only one way to assist the evil’s extermination: not to prevent any evildoers from destroying other scoundrels thus clearing the place for the righteous ones.
Andrew, you’re always talking about the alternative conception of ruling. But you hold back the today’s dominating conception. Or have I wrongly understood?
I thought, Mr. Holmes, that it’s no need to discuss the existing conception since all of us, at least on the West, live under it. Thus we don’t take it as the conception of ruling, like a child doesn’t know about the air he’s breathing. For me the today’s conception is Bible and the culture born by it with their conceptual and terminological systems. Today this culture is near to dominate over the whole world because of the technologies created by it. And it doesn’t matter what other cultures think of it. Radio, television, car, plane rocket, modern ship – all of this is the production of the biblical culture under the mask of Christianity-the-result-of-history. The Arabian world with its Islam, Japan with its Shinto, China with Confucianism or India with Hinduism can shame and defame West culture. But they just aren’t able to manage without its technocratic attributes, applying which they “erode” their own cultures via the unconscious people’s perception of western technical “toys”. And I even don’t talk about the technologies of their creation, which other countries are trying to become proficient in. Whether they like it or not, but this is a one-way process. You’d ask me why? If other cultures have no defence against the biblical culture, you wonder? I can easily say: no they don’t. And this is because though they seem to be quite different they have something common, what unites them – the crowd-“elitism”. One can endlessly discuss advantages and disadvantages of Christian, Judaic, Islamic, Shinto’s, Hinduism’s, Confucian and even Marxian or scientological crowd-“elitisms”, but a crowd-“elitism” will remain a crowd-“elitism” until any alternative will appear. But this alternative should be not just a dream of ideal life of everybody on the Earth. There were enough of such dreams and one can see it in different tales, legends, songs or ballads. At first it should consist of a harmonious system of views on every part of crowd-“elitist” society’s life expressed in certain words.