The six EMP weapons detonated in a pattern roughly forming two unequal triangles covering both halves of the continent. The effects were most pronounced in the U.S., but Canada, Mexico, and several Central American countries reported effects to one degree or another. There were substantial effects absorbed by both military and civilian populations.
A second attack wave followed, with strikes directed at three large urban centers and selected ICBM/SAC targets in the upper Central states. Recent data suggest that as much as 300 MT of total destructive yield were realized in this second and ultimately final movement. The Western, Southwestern, and Central states were unaffected directly, though it is not known at this time whether this limited attack pattern on the part of the Soviets was the result of retaliatory American counterattacks or equipment failures in Soviet weaponry, or whether it was simply one phase of a larger but uncompleted Soviet attack strategy.
3.0 EMP EFFECTS
3.1 General
EMP forces generate enormously high voltages, which destroy the atomic structures of earthbound or space borne objects containing electronic circuitry. This energy, which lasts only several billionths of a second, is sufficient to ‘burn out’ most circuits such as those utilized by microchips and similar devices.
Consequently, six 9–10 MT Soviet weapons, detonated over 200 miles above the United States, produced a nearly simultaneous energy field that destroyed close to 70 percent of all microelectronics in use by both military and civilian organizations.
Shielding, such as that employed in the late prewar years by both the military and industry, was largely ineffective in coping with blasts and subsequent EMP forces of such magnitude. The two areas most severely affected by the EMP effect, for both the military and civilian populations, were communications and electronic data storage/processing.
Brief summaries of the damage sustained by EMP are described in the following sections.
3.2 Military
3.2.1 Overview
Five broad areas within the military system sustained the most severe damage from EMP-generated effects:
| AREA | PERCENTAGE OF DAMAGE SUSTAINED |
|---|---|
| Communications | 75% |
| Data storage/processing | 75 |
| Guidance systems | 65 |
| Intelligence-gathering systems | 60 |
| Detection systems, including radar | 70 |
3.2.2 Discussion
Overall assessment: Nearly catastrophic at 70-percent level.
The substantial dependence by the military establishment on microelectronics is demonstrated by the severe damage rates cited above. Prewar shielding procedures and methods proved to be largely ineffective. The failure to sufficiently employ “hardened” microchips is only one explanation, however. Although experiments were conducted before the war to measure EMP effects, all experiments failed to consider the massive EMP forces created by large MT weapons geostrategically placed. As demonstrated above, most communications, guidance, and information storage/processing capabilities were destroyed. Continental radar systems were similarly affected and, because of orbital satellite conditions and in-flight aircraft locations, substantial intelligence-gathering capacities were destroyed.
Communication facilities utilizing lasers, buried light fibers, and similar equipment survived relatively unharmed. Guidance systems in ICBMs in hardened silos also survived.
Electronic equipment utilizing non-microelectronic components received little or no damage.
3.2.3 Recovery Projections
Recovery of microelectronic capacities is dependent upon three critical factors: (1) the ability to replace/convert damaged components and systems with stockpiled prewar components/systems; (2) the capacity to replace damaged systems with new systems utilizing imported microelectronic components; and (3) the long-term capacity of the United States to rebuild its microelectronic industries.
Given these three factors, the following projections have been made:
| - | PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY IN AREA CAPACITY TO DATE | PERCENTAGE OF CAPACITY NONRECOVERABLE |
|---|---|---|
| Communications | 25% | 45% |
| Data processing/storage | 20 | 65 |
| Guidance systems | 60 | 22 |
| Intelligence-gathering systems | 18 | 72 |
| Detection systems | 24 | 40 |
The “Percentage of Capacity Nonrecoverable” statistics suggest estimated requirements for both imports and internal U.S. rebuilding efforts.
3.3 Civilian
3.3.1 Overview
This study has identified 12 major civilian business/industry/public enterprise areas most affected by EMP-generated effects:
| TYPE OF ENTERPRISE | PERCENTAGE OF DAMAGE SUSTAINED |
|---|---|
| Computer/information systems | 87% |
| Defense industry | 57 |
| Electronic/telecommunications | 73 |
| Financial industry | 41 |
| Government (all levels) | 67 |
| Heavy industry | 31 |
| Manufacturing | 28 |
| Petrochemical | 38 |
| Power/utilities | 57 |
| Service industry | 39 |
| Transportation | 60 |
3.3.2 Discussion
Overall assessment: High-end damage at 50-percent level. The nation’s civilian enterprises were affected almost as significantly as the military, perhaps because of inadequate shielding provisions. Although no precise figure can be calculated, it is believed that over 50 percent of the nation’s civilian microelectronic capacities were destroyed by EMP.
As with the military, the prewar civilian groups, including government, made extensive use of microelectronics, largely in computer applications for information storage and processing, and to a lesser extent in systems for manufacturing, airplane guidance, radio and television communications, and the like.
Unfortunately, because of national defense and reconstruction needs, few prewar surplus components are available and current import allocations are limited. As a consequence, the rate of recovery is lower than that for the military.
3.3.3 Recovery Projections
Projections for civilian recovery are based on factors similar to those outlined in 3.2.3 above. They are as follows:
| - | PERCENTAGE OF RECOVERY IN AREA CAPACITY TO DATE | PERCENTAGE OF CAPACITY NONRECOVERABLE |
|---|---|---|
| Computer/information systems | 24% | 55% |
| Defense industry | 27 | 57 |
| Electronics/telecommunications | 37 | 72 |
| Financial industry | 21 | 60 |
| Government (all levels) | 32 | 45 |
| Heavy industry | 15 | 40 |
| Manufacturing | 15 | 57 |
| Petrochemical | 39 | 46 |
| Power/utilities | 42 | 37 |
| Service industry | 18 | 69 |
| Transportation | 26 | 59 |