All this while, the days and weeks and months of our lives were eroding away. As we entered on the third year of our isolation on Mars, I had to speak to Tom about the news of Olympus’s accelerated progress towards the science unit.
“I know,” said Tom. “Dreiser told me.” He sat there with his head in his hands and said not another word.
16
My head was extremely bad. I did not attend the discussion when Belle Rivers stood beneath the blazing Hindenburg and argued her case for continuous education. As expected, it was opposed by Feneloni. Cang Hai and Guenz and the others reported the essence of the meeting.
After Belle and Crispin had outlined their plan, there was general applause. Several people rose and affirmed that the upbringing and care of children held the secret of a better society. One of the scientists quoted Socrates as saying that only the considered life was really worth living, and that consideration had to be nurtured in the young to sustain them throughout life.
Feneloni thought differently. The whole Rivers scheme was unworkable, in his opinion, and deserved to be unworkable. It was against human experience. It was wet nursing of the worst order. He became vehement. All living things had to find their own way in life. They succeeded or they failed. Rivers’s plan, in trying to guarantee there were no failures, guaranteed there would be no successes.
Was she not aware, he asked, of the tragic sense of life? All of the world’s great dramas hinged upon error or failure in an otherwise noble or noble-minded person. He cited Sophocles (“already mentioned”), Shakespeare and Ibsen as masters of this art form, which purged us with pity. Tragedy was an integral part of human society, tragedy was necessary, tragedy increased our understanding.
And at this point, someone laughed. It was the murderer, Peters, under mentatropy, who to many remained an outcast.
Others idly joined in the laughter. Feneloni looked confused and sat down, muttering that people who took him for a fool would soon find they were wrong.
It was agreed that the “Rivers plan” should be implemented, and allowed to run for a test period. The universe was too young for an emphasis to be laid on tragedy.
Volunteers were called for. They would be vetted and asked for their qualifications.
As usual, the proceedings were recorded, and the decisions arrived at entered on our computers.
My state of mind was low. Although we seemed to be making progress, I feared some malignant force from within might burst like a cancer into the open and render our plans and hopes useless. Outside, beyond our spicules, beyond our community of 6,000 biological entities, was the great indifferent matrix, a confusion of particles inimical to humanity.
And there was Olympus, monstrous and enigmatic. It was never far from our thoughts. Like life itself, it seemed imponderable, its laboured progress somehow a paradigm of the approach of illness.
It was in this glum mood I looked in on the C of E, the Committee of Evil, holding its weekly meeting. The rather comical title had been dreamed up by Suung Saybin, but the purpose was serious enough: to try and determine the nature and cause of evil, with a view to its regulation. “Perhaps the humour lies in the fact that they haven’t a hope,” I thought to myself. Maybe the committee was just another way in which people kept themselves amused.
Suung Saybin remained as chair and Elsa Lamont, she of the orthogonal figures and an Adminex official, as secretary. Otherwise, members of the panel changed from month to month. As I entered, John Homer Bateson rose to his feet.
“The previous speaker wastes our time,” he declared. “We cannot eradicate evil by religion, or even control it, as history shows. All history is a demonstration of the workings of evil. Like Thomas Hardy’s Immanent Will, ‘it weaves unconsciously as heretofore, eternal artistries of circumstance’. Nor will reason work. Reason is frequently the ally of wrong-doing.
“Here we are, stuck on this little dried-up orange of a planet, and we plan to banish this monster? Why, we’re in its clutches! What are the component parts, the limbs, the testicles, of evil? Greed, ambition, aggression, fear, power … All these elements were integral to the very nature of EUPACUS, the conglomerate that dumped us here.
“What impossibly naive view do you have of the nations that stranded us? The United States is by no means the worst of them. But it seeks to extend its empire into space—apologies, matrix. All the grand designs we may have about exploring this matrix mean nothing to the absconding financiers who backed matrix exploration. All this talk of Utopia—it means nothing, absolutely nothing, to the greedy men in power. Power, money, greed—if you kicked out the present set of slimebags, why, more slimebags would fill the breach.
“I’ll tell you a story. It’s really a parable, but you’d distrust that term.”
“You have five minutes, John,” interposed Suung Saybin.
Ignoring her, Bateson continued, “A man was stranded alone on a planet that was otherwise uninhabited. He lived the blameless life of a hermit, befriending bats, rats, slugs, spiders—anything that amused him. That way, you attain sainthood, don’t you? One day, a vessel came down from space—pardon me, from the matrix—to rescue him. A grand sparkling ship, from which emerged a man in a golden space suit with long wavy blond hair and a manly tan, bearing a large picnic hamper.
“‘I’m your saviour,’ he exclaimed, embracing the hermit.
“The hermit got a good grip on the man’s throat and strangled him. Now he owned the spaceship. And the picnic basket.
“What, I ask you, were his motives? Hatred of intrusion on his privacy, hunger, envy of the golden suit, aversion to this intruder’s display of hubris, greed to possess the ship, ambition to enjoy power himself? Or all these things? Or had solitude driven him mad?
“You cannot resolve these questions—and I have offered you a simple textbook case. The promptings to evil are in all of us. Evil is not a single entity, but a many-splendoured thing. You’re wasting your time here if you think otherwise.”
I crept from the room.
Being unable to take lunch, I went to a remote upper gallery in search of solitude. Fond though I was of Cang Hai, I hoped to avoid her endless chatter. But there I happened upon my adopted daughter, sitting with her child playing at her feet. Alpha ran to me. I hugged her and kissed her cheeks. Cang Hai, meanwhile, picked up her sheets and assumed a pose whereby I was to take it she had been studying them.
“I’m surprised to see you up here, Tom. How are you?”
“Fine. And you?”
“Trying to learn some science. I’m trying to understand about superfluids. Apparently they are called Bose-Einstein condensates.”
Alpha said, “Mummy looks out the window.”
“Yes. I believe that’s what Dreiser’s ring contains.”
“I said, Mummy looks out of the window most of the time!” screamed Alpha.
“You can certainly learn science there,” I said. Under the endless panoply of stars, dark matter and particles, the Martian landscape rolled its dunescape away into the distance, unvarious, unchanging, and baked or frozen by turns. The thought came, What harm in trying to turn it into a garden?
“Is something troubling you?” I asked.
“No.” Then, “I try to study here, alone with Alpha. I’m glad, always glad, to see you.” Then, “Those lustful hounds I had to work with in Manchuria … No … Only the ambiguities of this research.” She tapped her 3D sheets. “Even light behaving like both waves and particles. It’s hard to grasp!”