action, should have their dependents removed from them. Let the person who insists on remaining in shock sit there, in
shock, until death if this is their decision. Put your energies into the living, those who have chosen life, instead.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/xtime/x02.htm[2/5/2012 11:19:27 AM]
ZetaTalk: Rotting Bodies
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Rotting Bodies
written Sep 2, 2003, during Lou Gentile live radio
Primarily, the large die-off will be in places which are pleasant living now, coastal cities, or river basin cities. These cities grew up where commerce was available, and the heavy die-off will be there. Since the waters rise, it will become fish food. In other areas, cities high in the hills, obviously, this will be a reeking mess. Nature takes care of this, in short order, within months, through bacteria and bugs. If you really want to know how to deal with it, get some
chickens that eat the bugs and send them out there to fill up, and then you can eat the eggs. Just stay downwind of the stench. This is not exactly socially proper advice, because people want to bury their dead. Most of the dead will be
under buildings or trapped under water somewhere. You have to do a mindset to think of the survivors. Think of the
living who are feeling pain. Your obligation to the dead is only a ritual you can put aside.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta24.htm[2/5/2012 11:19:27 AM]
ZetaTalk: Starvation
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Starvation
written Nov 25, 2003
Envisioning the dire situation in the days leading up to the shift, and following, many good hearted folk wonder what
they are supposed to do when there is a single loaf of bread for supper and a thousand mouths to feed. Of course, this is no different than today, for many. Starvation is rampant around the world, in many countries indigenous, so it is
only those in affluent environments who wonder such things. Those already starving know how these matters are
settled. But the reaction to starvation differs immensely, based on spiritual orientation. Those in the Service-to-Self horde, jerk food from the weak and either sell it for whatever price the desperate market will bear or add it to their
stores even if their stores are rotting for want of use. Those who have not decided their spiritual orientation dither
between sharing a mouthful now and then with a friend or piteous soul, stuffing what they can hide in their pockets
when around bullies, and otherwise wailing about the situation loudly expecting to be rescued. Those strongly in the
Service-to-Others work more by plan, having sorted this out well ahead of time in previous lifetimes.
In general, depending upon the culture and situation, segments of human society are selected to simply starve to death.
This is done today in many cultures, where the very old and feeble refuse food and a tender good-bye is given during
the few days of their rather painless decline into coma and death. They are expected to do this, and as these cultures
are often highly Service-to-Other in orientation, such as the American Indian, afford their elderly esteem, and thus this is not seen so much as a punishment for age as an honor. In other cultures, quite without malice, the very young are
given this treatment. Babies born and barely conscious are put out in the elements to die, or left without milk or fluids which quickly puts them into coma. No new mouths to feed. Lest this be viewed with horror, the alternative is that this child would be brain damaged if starving in early life, if managing to live at all, an alternative the culture is acutely aware of with examples in the community. Where the starvation has progressed beyond this point, a similar selection
process is done into the group, those already ill and not expected to be hale or recover volunteer, or an adult in a
family group determines that their portion should go to the growing children or the remaining spouse. Starving or
dying of thirst is not painful, and when done with love in consideration of the group, is not done in anguish.
Given the situation where the culture is not highly Service-to-Other, but mixed, how then would a Service-to-Other leader proceed? The choice is for those in empathy for others to starve themselves, leaving the group under the
leadership of more ruthless types, or a plan. In this case, not simply volunteers are to be selected to starve to death, as this would ultimately leave only the ruthless. A community meeting, where the matter is discussed, is appropriate. It
should be expected that the selfish will loudly insist they be given first opportunity to stuff themselves. The matter
should be presented in the light of what human societies have always done in the face of intractable starvation. If hunting and fishing is bringing in food, then the best hunter or fisherman should be spared. If a nursing mother is
acting as wet nurse to several toddlers, then her survival affects more than just herself. If someone has a skill or talent needed for group survival, or affecting this, then despite their desire to give their portion to others, they should be pressed to spare themselves. Even selfish groups will see that some approach must be taken, and after argument, consensus will prevail.
All this is assuming that all means of feeding the group has been considered, all food sources included. We have mentioned that weeds and bugs should be included in the diet. In the face of starvation, eating the dead should also be considered. The soul moves on, the body rots, and better it be given in love to those struggling than rot. This is, after all, what a loving member of the group would want, when volunteering to starve for the others. Don’t let me go to
waste, would be his or her last words! Or is it better the hunter miss his shot, the wet nurse giving the only protein
toddlers with growing brains are getting go dry, and the young become brain damaged as a consequence of their
starvation. You decide.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta49.htm[2/5/2012 11:19:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Social Services
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Social Services
Note: written Dec 15, 1995.
After the cataclysms the snug blanket of protection that many have taken for granted will be gone - no Social Security
checks, no home deliveries, no 911 emergency service, no free medical services, and no welfare checks. For those not
relying on those services the shock will be as great, as with home, job, and service providers gone they will be just as destitute and bereft. In essence, humans will be relying on one another, and not on an infrastructure. What will this mean? In most societies there are rules about who should live and who should die, even when these rules are not
articulated. Many American Indians let their old choose the time of their departure, a spiritual and poignant moment
for all, as the old were a burden on the young that all agreed could not be borne. In some cultures malformed infants
are not nourished, and all cultures push what they consider their undesirables to the periphery, to wither and perchance to die.