instead. If it looks like the US is going to create a mess in Iran, by some devious means using the existing Iraq War to
spill over the borders, this is a card likely to be used.
The likely outcome is that the US will threaten and bluster, plant evidence against Iran that the US citizen and the
world does not believe, rumble tanks and planes up to the border of Iran, and there the conflict stops. There will
certainly be tense moments behind closed doors when the military is asked to take steps they refuse to take,
confrontations that will not come out in the media until later, as leaks. Support for the US debt will steadily drop, with
the US quietly going banana republic at least to some degree, while the 2006 elections take place and Congress
changes its face to a more aggressive stance against Bush. Talk of impeachment, once not dared to be uttered, will
increase, and an honest admission that Iraq may have to become several different countries in order to attain peace will
be increasingly seen as the solution in Iraq. The US public will suffer the consequences, keeping the pressure on to
stop the financial hemorrhage in Iraq that the US can no longer afford. Congress will take over, running the nation if
only by blocking Bush at every front. The military will come home, not only because funding for Iraq will be
withdrawn, but because of natural disasters that will afflict every country in the months ahead. Although this is in the
hands of man and man has free will, and thus any predictions must be predicated on this, we predict that
Bush will not succeed in invading or bombing Iran, though orders may be given to the military to do so,
will not publicly declare martial law in the US in order to dictate his ways, though may write executive orders to this effect which will be ignored by any but the tight cabal surrounding him,
will not be assassinated or impeached because the tight cabal around him prevents alternative leadership from
stepping up to the plate, but rather
Bush and those he has pulled close around him will be treated as irrelevant as the Earth changes overtake the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta268.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:36 AM]
ZetaTalk: Iran Boondoggle
attention of the nation, with the branches of government attending to emergencies and ignoring the orders the
pretender barks from the Oval Office.
Who will lead, in this vacuum? Is it assumed that the President actually leads? Government in a democracy is by
consensus, with someone pronouncing the consensus in a speech. The US will become a country where the media
identifies a spokesperson for a trend or issue and the President is ignored. Press conferences, speeches, where the
President can commandeer the TV cameras and attempt to sell the public on an idea or announce initiatives are given
by the media, as a gift, but are not mandated by law. Nor is coverage in the newspapers mandated by law. The Puppet
Master, in fact, has more influence than the White House, in this regard. Who has been a charismatic spokesperson of
late, on issues that relate? Gore, or Finegold, or Murtha, are examples, but the Earth changes that will afflict the nation
will find many new spokespersons emerging. During times of trouble, natural leadership emerges, and pretenders are
ignored.
Signs of the Times #1567
Dubya Clings to Failed Policy of Pre-emptive Strikes [Mar 17] http://www.capitolhillblue.com/
President George W. Bush clung to his doomed doctrine of using preemptive force against threats of
weapons of mass destruction despite his failure in Iraq, claiming Iran may be America's biggest
security challenge. [and from another] Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming
Iranian Oil Bourse [Aug 3, 2005] The Bush administration is prepared to undertake a desperate
military strategy to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions, while simultaneously attempting to prevent the
Iranian oil Bourse from initiating a euro-based system for oil trades. Such an event would create
pressure for OPEC and Russia to move towards a monopoly petroeuro system in an effort to cripple
the U.S. dollar and thwart the U.S. global military presence. [and from another]
http://www.infoplease.com/ Total oil production 1. Saudi Arabia 10.37, 2. Russia 9.27, 3. United
States 8.69, 4. Iran 4.09, 5. Mexico 3.83, 6. China 3.62, 7. Norway 3.18, 8. Canada 3.14, 9.
Venezuela 2.86, 10. United Arab Emirates 2.76, 11. Kuwait 2.51, 12. Nigeria 2.51, 13. United
Kingdom 2.08, 14. Iraq 2.03 [and from another] http://www.infoplease.com/ Greatest Oil Reserves
by Country, 2005 1. Saudi Arabia 261.9, 2. Canada 178.81, 3. Iran 125.8, 4. Iraq 115.0, 5. Kuwait
101.5, 6. United Arab Emirates 97.8, 7. Venezuela 77.2, 8.Russia 60.0, 9. Libya 39.0, 10. Nigeria
35.3
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta268.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:36 AM]
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
written July 15, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.
Israel was battling with Hamas in Palestine. Then another front opened with the Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Now Israel is giving ultimatums to Syria, claiming they are working with Hezbollah. Israel and the US are
even blaming Iran. Is this going to lead to WW III?
Why would Hezbollah suddenly decide to enter the fray, kidnapping Israeli soldiers and lobbing missiles into Israel? Is
it an alliance with the embattled Hamas? Was is some offense against Hezbollah, perpetrated by Israel? All seemed
peaceful until this sudden explosion. Israel has used the violence and suicide bombing done by Palestinians as an
excuse to push them off their land and retain what land they have already grabbed. The issue of Palestine could be easily solved by Israel if it were only reasonable and fair, so the matter is in their hands. What led into the situation
where Hammas kidnapped an Israeli soldier? The Hammas government was squeezed financially, Israel holding back
funds rightfully Palestine's, and Israel encouraging other nations to financially starve Palestine too. This finally
exploded, as it was expected to explode. But there was no such recent incitement with Lebanon, so what caused an
explosion there?
We have often mentioned that things are not what they seem. The Iraq insurgents creating an unstable situation in Iraq are often British soldiers, who have been caught dressed as Arabs with bombs in their cars, arrested by the Iraqi police,
and then sprung from jail by the Brits. Once incited, fingers point in all directions and the street fighting and retaliation
is assured. The Berg beheading was not done by Arabs at all, as could be seen by a simple analysis of the dress and mannerisms of the executioners. The Golden Mosque was bombed by the US, to incite civil war in Iraq, which the US
hoped would spill over into Iran, avoiding a need to get approval from a now reluctant US Congress for such a war expansion. But civil war in Iraq has fallen back to a simmer, with the new Iraqi government taking steps the US does
not want. They plan to call the insurgents resistance fighters, and give them amnesty. This would bring the Sunni