unexpectedly disintegrated upon reentry, so that funding will not be questioned. Something as simple as a faulty rubber
ring, an O-Ring, can create a shuttle disaster for NASA, such is their track record. The bundled devices, tumbling in
one of the spins man is forever discounting and refusing to understand as they smugly assume they know all the
factors involved and their math describing such situations flawless, did not strike point on as expected. Thus, the initial
impact broke the bundle, and sent each nuclear device bouncing on it's own. Ricocheting about, these devices exploded
on the surface of the Dark Twin over time, independently as each finally aligned so that the tip of the device was the
strike point.
There is more than embarrassment at NASA today, who must explain the unexplainable, as the true mission did not
succeed. Assuming that large hunks of rock can be nudged into new orbits or trajectories, according to all the math
man holds so dear and proudly brags put man on the Moon so it must be accurate, they found otherwise. No change in
position occurred, whatsoever, and the orbits continue as before. Could it be that something other than Newton's Math
rules the Universe? Something akin to the Sweeping Arms of the Sun and particle flows coming back into the Sun at
her middle such that the planets are held in these flows, swept inward toward the Sun but held at bay by the Repulsion
Force? We have patiently demonstrated that the Moon is too large, and moving too slowly, to be held up above Earth
by Centrifugal Force alone, an obvious fact met by ridicule by smug mathematicians when debated in the past. Tisk.
Those too arrogant to learn are doomed to failure, this fact demonstrated once again.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta230.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deep Impact Result
Signs of the Times #1475
Mission Accomplished: Probe Hits Comet [Jul 4] 'NASAś fleet of space telescopes, including the
Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-ray Observatory and Spitzer Space Telescope, and dozens of
ground observatories also viewed the impact.' [and from another source] Today in German PRO7
Evening News a representative of ESA (European Space Agency) mentioned that another objective
of this mission was to find out if it would be possible to hit an incoming celestial body. The science
team head said three times that he could not understand how their little impactor could have caused
such a large reaction. It was still outbursting a half hour after impact. [and from another source] A
Nasa scientist on the NBC world news tonight made the comment that we need to know if we can
change the course of a comet in case one is on a collision course with Earth. [and from another
source] During the BBC program the interviewer Graham Cox for the Open University BBC
telephoned Karen and asked her, what was her response to the rather long after glow of the deep
impact and she said something like 'well we don´t really know'. Karen was the one responsible for
coordinating 100 observatories world wide over six years to home in on Deep Impact. [and from
another source] I was listening to George Noory on C2C [Jul 5] with Hoagland and McCaney
discussing the strike on Temple1. They speculated the NASA was lying and that they saw two lights
one of which may have been a nuclear explosion. [and from another
source]http://www.rumormillnews.com/ NASA scientists were astonished and expressed their
amazement on camera and in no uncertain terms: The blast was 'considerably more energetic than I
expected.' 'The big question is how did we make such a big splash.' 'I'm at a loss to explain it.' [and
from another source] NASA keeps showing the same things. Pre-impact photo, post impact photo
taken a few seconds after impact. Its been 45 hours! Where are the current images? [and from
another source]http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/ 'CFHT Image (Canada France Hawaii Telescope)
equipped with the Megacam camera, pre- and post-impact (image below)' [Note: analysis of the
background stars indicates the series of blasts moved over a considerable area in less than an hour.
This would be appropriate for a large black planet sized rock like the Dark Twin, but not for a
comet sized, object. See also Sign #1469.]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta230.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:50 AM]
ZetaTalk: Popular Vote
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Popular Vote
Note: written on Dec 15, 2000
What possible reason would there be to call out the US Supreme Court to defend a candidate that had lost the popular
vote, on all fronts. Gore had won an edge of 21 electoral votes, by some 300,000 popular votes, and was only 3
electoral votes shy of winning the Presidency. Gore also won the popular vote in Florida, a fact clear to even the ultra-
right Buchannan who admitted the 3,000 vote he received above what might be expected in the Jewish enclave of Palm
Beach were not his votes, but Gore's. The Florida vote re-count was stopped, repeatedly, by partisan loyalists of the
Bush family. Where this might have been expected in Florida, controlled by the Bush family, what would cause the
Supreme Court to break its long standing tradition of not getting involved in Presidential contests - a tradition that had
endured throughout its history?
The cry that every vote should count, echoed by the GOP lawyers when their behind-the-scenes efforts to boost their
candidate by illegal amendments to absentee ballots were exposed, were put aside when the Democratic opposition
presented the same argument. This familiar court-room posture by lawyers, whereby they contradict themselves from
one day to the next when trying to win the argument of the moment, could have been expected of lawyers. But what
would cause the Supreme Court, when stopping a legally called re-count and effort to examine every ballot for the
intent of the voter, to cast a blind eye to one group of voters while giving an irrational protection to another group?
The only difference appeared to be partisanship, that the judges themselves had been appointed by Republicans, as the
final vote was strictly along partisan lines.
But is there more to this picture? Did the Supreme Court not have more to lose, in this vote, in that the public looks to
it to be non-partisan and supporting the Constitution? Where talk of disenfranchised voters and a partisan Supreme
Court will die down, the shock that the citizenry feels at what is a betrayal of their voting rights will not diminish.
Often the larger the shock, the greater the stunned silence, so that the long-reaching and long-lasting effect of this
shock are not gauged by the smug winning party. Nevertheless, a deep distrust of the new administration will be the