ZetaTalk: An Inconvenient Truth
written June 15, 2006
Would the Zetas like to comment on an informative movie called An Inconvenient Truth? It appears the
film is hinting at future flooding under the guise of global warming when in truth the cause are effects of
the pole shift. [and from another] Would the Zetas care to comment about Al Gores statement that we
have only ten years to stop Global Warming?
Al Gore is certainly aware of the pending pole shift, and
the effect Planet X is having on the Earth. As a Vice
President under Clinton, he was an automatic member of
MJ12, and would have learned this from that source if he
was not already cognizant. So why then is he purporting
that the Earth changes are due to Global Warming? Gore
is in a unique position, poised to return to the Presidency
which he was denied. We have stated that he is the de
facto Commander in Chief of the US Military, in their
eyes. The US Military is not alone in considering him the
only legitimate President, since 2000. The vote fraud in
2004 has continued that situation, with Gore the last
person legitimately elected to be President of the United
States, by challenging his loss of position. Kerry lost this
status in the eyes of those backing Gore when he
capitulated, readily, and did not even challenge his loss in Ohio.
The US government has been posed at the brink of a rebellion, to take back the government from those who took it by
fraud in both 2000 and 2004. What is restraining this coup, this return to legitimacy, is the bulk of Congress who are
slavishly obedient to Bush and the vote fraud machine, and the packed Supreme Court. Lately the Supreme Court has
become an unknown, with two new Bush appointees, but the assumption is that they would align with Bush in any
constitutional crisis. Vote fraud was assumed for the future. GOP members of Congress could not miss the promise
electronic voting fraud had of delivering Karl Rove's dream, GOP control forever. Thus intimidated, they followed the
dictates coming from the White House. Vote fraud has lately been exposed, pulled into mainstream media attention by
the Puppet Master, who is steadfastly decapitating the Bush Administration from any influence over the affairs of the world. GOP control of Congress thus can no longer be assured, and in view of the polls must be assumed to be lost.
Thus the time when the US public can be fully informed - about the stolen 2000 election, the fraudulent 2004 election,
the cover-up over 911, the use of the US Military to gain control of the Middle East oil fields, and many other crimes -
is close at hand.
What does this mean for Al Gore? Gore has kept himself in the public eye, coming forth for well publicized lectures on
the need to protect the Constitution, and has retained his following among those who deem him the legitimate
President. For a public announcement that Bush is illegitimate and Gore to replace him in the White House, there is
more than the following among those in government required. The hearts and minds of the public must be ready to
accept the bad news that the White House has been home to a group of criminals by embracing the good news that
someone they respect and are familiar with, in fact elected in 2000 by popular vote, is going to set this right. Thus, the
current press to be the spokesperson for Global Warming has as its real agenda to put Gore into the public view, in a
favorable way. How can he lose, in this current campaign? Global Warming has been the prime excuse for the Earth
changes caused by Planet X, which by general agreement cannot yet to announced to the public. Can Bush counter the
Gore argument by pointing to Planet X? Bush has shown contempt for the changes that a Global Warming excuse
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta293.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: An Inconvenient Truth
would require. He refuses to comply with the Koyoto Agreement, insisting that the US as the greatest consumer of
carbon fuels in the world can continue on this splurge, unabated. He gives lip service only to alternative energy
sources, while backing big oil companies all the way.
Meanwhile the fury and frequency of storms pounding the US is on the increase. Bush, already low in the polls
because of the conduct of the War in Iraq and the loss of jobs in the US, will now have the finger pointed at him on yet
another issue. He is the cause of the storms pounding the US, indirectly, by not taking action on Global Warming
issues. One sees on one hand the compassionate and concerned Gore, detailing the steps that should be taken, and on
the other hand the arrogant and detached Bush, dismissive of any action required and with his Katrina response
standing in stark contrast to Gore. This is a clever approach on Gore's part, which Bush cannot win. He cannot point to
Planet X. He cannot, given the expectations of his backers and cronies, suddenly decide that big oil companies need to
change their ways. He has pushed the US into a debt position so there is no room for funding of alternative fuels unless
he backs out of Iraq or changes his position on tax cuts for the rich. He is trapped, and thus can be assumed to stand in
place, rigid, while Gore captures the hearts of those increasingly affected by the weather changes. Disasters in the US,
sure to come as the Earth changes increase, will likewise focus anger on the Bush Administration for their cuts in
social services. When the time comes to overturn those who have stolen the White House, there will be no contest in
where the affections of the public lie. No need to go to the polls. Gore wins this vote, too.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta293.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Rove Squeeze
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Rove Squeeze
written June 17, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.
Fitzgerald has decided not to indict Rove. Can the Zeta's comment on his decision and secondly can they
give us an update on their discussion concerning the Fitzgerald indictments that were , according to the
Zeta's, delivered to the court on Friday, Oct 21, 2005.
Karl Rove was not excused from indictment because of innocence, a failure on Fitzgerald's part to muster a case
against him. Quite the opposite. This is the story you are hearing from Rove's attorney. Has the public seen the letter
Fitzgerald sent to Luskin, Rove's attorney? Has the public heard from Fitzgerald? It was clear as long ago as the Fall
of 2005 that Fitzgerald had a case against Rove, and for Rove to return to the Grand Jury yet another time in the Spring of 2006 was a signal that he and his attorney were desperate. So what happened? Rove rolled over, under the
unrelenting pressure that Fitzgerald is famous for, and is plea bargaining. The clue to this is the confident and loud
assertion by Luskin that Rove will not be indicted. How could he assert this over the past weeks and months, if he is
not the decision maker? He asserted this because he was bargaining for Rove the whole time, intensely, and knew one