NASA has been a traditional stronghold advocating the right of the elite to privileged information, and many at the top
of this organization are reluctant to see this focus change. As members of MJ12, they are frequently active CIA agents,
and thus these top executives play a dual role with allegiance to both organizations. Where the CIA dominated MJ12
in the early days, MJ12 has been increasingly casting aside this influence to the extent that CIA agents within MJ12
are almost excluded from decision making and their dual allegiance is considered a handicap rather than an asset.
Under orders to follow recent changes in policy designed to promote the Awakening, hardened advocates of the old
line have dragged their feet and frankly operated in an subordinate manner.
What should be remembered in these matters is that membership in MJ12 always involves an agreement by the
member to grant MJ12 the Right to Terminate the member should this be considered necessary. This was, of course, a
casual agreement by CIA members in the past, who looked at the general operating mode, almost exclusively under
CIA influence, and thought themselves quite safe. Where this termination clause is thought to cover leaks, the
suppression of information, it also covers refusal to follow direct orders from the MJ12 ruling boards. Passive
resistance is often overlooked, unless the individual is in a position within society such that they and only they can
implement an MJ12 order. In these matters, refusal to cooperate can become critical, and termination might be the
result for refusal to play an activist role.
Such was the case going into the 1997 Mars mission, where a probe was committed to examine plateaus on Mars long
claimed to hold a Sphinx-like head distinctively hominoid in appearance. Severely repressed in the past, shots from
various angle could excite discussion like no other object, as the face would be reveals undeniably as an artifact, not a
natural formation appearing to be a face only a certain angles create shadows giving this illusion. The cooperation of
NASA was imperative on this MJ12 mission, and critical points could be missed unrecoverable if absolutely
cooperation was not assured.
The 1997 Mar's Pathfinder probe, under the direction of Jurgen Rahe, had to have a
cooperative hand at the helm or face failure, in the view of MJ12, and thus after relentless
arguments with a man adamantly opposed to the new MJ12 policies, his termination was
arranged. This was not a decision arrived at casually, nor was it a quick decision. A
determination that a compromise was not possible, and that Rahe could not be removed from
his post in a timely manner, were factors in the decision. Highly visible operations such as
NASA probes do not allow wiggle room, and a displaced executive was sure to be
interviewed or endlessly hounded for comments. Such exposure, and the risk an angry Rahe
posed, were also factors in the decision. A competent and highly reluctant executive could not
be casually displaced, but a death by an accident seemingly caused by mother nature could be
arranged, and was deemed the less of two evils.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g94.htm[2/5/2012 11:43:49 AM]
ZetaTalk: Moon Landing
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Moon Landing
Note: written on May 15, 2002
A hot topic on the Internet and among conspiracy buffs is whether man ever indeed landed on the Moon, or all the
evidence provided to mankind is faked. As evidence of a fake is apparent wind blowing a flag, dust raised by landing
feet blowing about as though air were present to move it, shadows inappropriate for the Moon, and other evidence of
atmosphere or staging. Did man go to the Moon? Absolutely. Were dramatizations done in film theaters? Absolutely.
both occurred, and here's why.
As is often reported, the early Moon landings involved startled astronauts making statements on live feed about "we
were not the first" and the like. Likewise, live video feed showed trash on the Moon giving evidence that activity had
occurred in the past, and perhaps the recent past. Evidence of awareness of the alien presence, or other information not
given to the general public, can often be discerned from what is not said as much as what is said. Why the 3 month
delay in reporting, by different media organizations, if approval to report was not a part of the process? Likewise, the
astronauts were on a need-to-know basis, as they were expected to be mobbed if they succeeded and went on the
lecture tour, often interviewed and the like, and slips were to be avoided by telling them as little as possible. Thus, they
were genuinely startled by what they found on the Moon, and their handlers in Houston were unaware of the degree of
evidence they would in fact find on the Moon. Oops! What to do? Lets just film some new footage, and release that,
instead.
NASA was aware that there were alien enclaves on the dark side of the Moon, but unaware of the trash on the visible
side. During early genetic engineering projects, the engineers often used the Moon as a lab, fearing and wishing to
avoid the large carnivores on Earth. During these genetic engineering episodes, they would scarcely be hiding on the
dark side of the Moon! Why hide? The aliens talking to NASA going into the Apollo missions were Service-to-Self,
part of Alternative 2, to set up camps off Earth as a survival means during the coming pole shift. They were on the dark
side as Service-to-Self aliens do not do density shifting well, ala the movie The Fly, and their masters do not allow
their minions to shift during missions, for this reason. Thus, they are in 3rd Density, highly visible from Earth should
they not be on the dark side of the Moon. NASA expected this, but discussion on past genetic engineering projects,
which were not done by the Service-to-Self, never came up!
The astronauts were read the riot act when they returned, having blabbered their first impressions on the Moon. It has
been obvious to those looking at the pattern that prior to this live feeds were the norm, and after delayed and only
partial release of video and audio was allowed. When a heavy job of intimidation is done, with death threats and worse
than death threats, it takes a lot to release this. Beat a dog each hour, viciously, for months, and then try to tell it that
was all in the past. The dog has lost trust, cowers, growls, avoids, and will likely never trust humans again most
certainly if not in the same company. NASA has not changed hands, is still the same agency, infiltrated by CIA, and
thus the astronauts, as their beaten dogs, are loath to trust.
Note: Below added during Nov 16, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
NASA of late has been dealing with its many failures, its inability to get a space station operational in time to stage
escape to Mars, and the months upon months of delays getting any shuttles up at all. Wanting to be a player, perhaps