Выбрать главу

chess board, to be put out to be killed, the front line, not powerful and never questioning their position. Thus, they are

often sent to their death and likewise killed if they object to this role. UN military assigned all over the world do not

often perform well, though this is covered up to avoid political embarrassment. Peacekeeping missions have military

personnel coming and going, with the press not privy to the reasons, and misbehavior in service people in foreign

countries is also kept form the news as much as possible. Thus, the occasional rape, or drunken battery case, that does

get into the news, is considered not outside of the crime reported in cities worldwide.

Consider that you do not get the full story, and such breakdown occurs more often than reported. Crimes in cities is

faceless, makes good press, and does not embarrass the elite. Crimes committed by military is considered a problem as

the populace is to think of them as staunch, like pawns, not moving until directed to do so. Thus, when the truth starts

coming out, that the military is far more unstable than the public suspects, it is a shock. Peace keepers who stand back

and take no action, or generals who only worry about being able to return home in one piece, are seldom revealed.

Rape of citizens by visiting military is dampened, and the victims bought off. All to perpetuate the illusion that the

elite have control. Expect more horror stories from cracks in the military, and the elite, as the times get more stressful.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g156.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:29 AM]

ZetaTalk: Travel Restrictions

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Travel Restrictions

Note: written during the Jan 7, 2003 IRC Session

Travel restrictions will likely be imposed by governments in response to migrations, but not until this occurs. Thus,

this will vary by country, within country, and in truth is in place long before pole shift issues such as weather changes

and increasing starvation occurred. The US has restrictions on immigration from Central America and Mexico, but wet

backs and illegal nannies employed in the US have been a long standing problem. North Korea is starving, the starving

children among the populace creeping into China to raid fields and beg food ongoing for some years. This is controlled

not by the Chinese, who themselves are starving, but by the North Koreans, who do not want the world to know of

their state. Where sudden homelessness or joblessness is cared for in some manner in situ, at the site, there will be no

migration and no travel restrictions.

An earthquake ravaged city, with tents cities placed on the perimeter and military to prevent looting, will find the

majority of the populace in place, waiting for supper and not arguing with their military guards when told to return to

their tents as there are looters afoot and they want the survivors to be safe. If a long time running until the shift,

months, such a tent city will need to clear travel for those parties who have relatives or second homes elsewhere, and

passes will be issued under the guise of a pass so the military will allow passage, not think the travelers looters. Where

life goes on, unaffected by high tides or ravaged by weather or quakes, travel will in all likelihood be similar to today,

to seek work or to visit relatives or whatever. There will be less travel, during hard times, for entertainment, as the

airline industry has already noted. Thus, until the week going into the shift, when all controls are likely to be lifted due

to distraction by those assigned to enforce the restrictions, any number of controls may be imposed, and suddenly,

based on Earth changes. This is one reason to be in your chosen safe location early, and if not possible, to have valid

excuses to be there should you need the excuse.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g181.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:30 AM]

ZetaTalk: Executive Orders

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Executive Orders

written July 21, 2007

Bush now declares that per his latest executive order, he can deprive individuals of their property in an

unconstitutional manner if they are found to "be supporting terrorist activities" of the enemy in Iraq. This

is obviously one more desperate, pathetic measure on his part to destroy the constitution and the county,

which I assume will be ignored, hopefully? [and from another] President Bush signed an executive order

on July 17, 2007, basically stating that if he determines that you might pose a risk to the government, the

government can seize your house, car, bank account etc. This is the mark, not only of his insanity and ego,

but it is the fundamental stance of a dictator. How does a person fight this sort of thing other than

contacting your Congress persons who are doing nothing? What do the Zetas say about this executive

order? How much longer are we going to have to tolerate Bush's insanity? The Democrats are not doing

anything. Will Bush be impeached soon? It is obvious that he and his people are planning another terror

attack. You have said they will not get away with it and I believe you. I believe that we are approaching

the point of no return with Bush and his policies. If we do not stand up now, he will be dictator for life.

[and from another] Old-line Republican Warns 'Something's in the Works' to Trigger a Police State [Jul

19] http://rawstory.com/news/2007/ A new Executive Order allows the government to seize the assets of

anyone who interferes with its Iraq policies. Unless Congress immediately impeaches Bush and Cheney, a

year from now the US could be a dictatorial police state at war with Iran. In the absence of a massive

popular outcry, the only constraints on what's going to happen will come from the federal bureaucracy

and perhaps the military. They may have had enough. They may not go along with it.

We have warned, almost on a weekly basis on the GLP live chats, that there is a confrontation building between the

Bush White House and those in the government who know the White House to be a criminal enterprise, one that is

also illicit due to voter fraud in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Fitzgerald has massive amounts of

documented evidence that has already been presented to the Judicial system. There is a growing contingent in the

Judicial system, the US military, the Congress, and the FBI who are of the opinion that the entire White House should

be arrested. What holds them back? As we have repeatedly mentioned, they fear the reaction by the American public.