and in particular Britain, are being attacked by various terrorist groups? We have stated that the 77 attack in London
was not by Muslims, but arranged by Bush and Blair, to further their interests. What has happened in Britain just
recently for both these men to want a repeat of the 77 incident? Blair was forced out of office, his legacy the Iraq War,
so unpopular in Britain. His goal would be to be proved correct, in retrospect. Brown, his replacement, is not the Bush
hugger that Blair was, and allies with the British people rather than Bush. So having terrorism land on his doorstep just
as he takes office, would, so Bush hopes, force him to change his stance and declare the War on Terror his top priority,
including remaining in Iraq as part of the coalition. All these attacks have the same base, including the attack on Spain
which was thrown in just to make it look like Britain was not the only victim. That the CCTV cameras, an intrusion on
privacy, were central to supposedly identifying the driver of one of the London car bombs is also not an accident, as
Bush hopes to point to this attack as justification of his own invasion of civil rights in the US. Bush is currently fearful
of investigations by Congress into his illegal acts, for which he could potentially be impeached. Just the thing for these
types of steps to be proven as helpful in actual terrorist attacks in London! Was the attack in Scotland intended to be a
suicide attack? The intention was to ram the car into the terminal and then escape just ahead of the explosion, but this
attack, like the London attacks, was stymied.
It is being reported that the cell phones to be used to ignite the London car bombs failed to work as expected, and this
no accident. Likewise the failure at Glasgow, which caused the drivers to be caught, rather than escape in the
confusion following the planned blast. Investigations into the background of these drivers will prove interesting, and
not all in the UK are in line with Blair's thinking, that all these false flag operations should be postured as true
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]
ZetaTalk: UK Car Bombs
terrorism to further Bush's plans for Martial Law and world takeover of the oii fields. Is this a change from the 77
attack on London, which was allowed to proceed without benign intervention from the Council of Worlds? Yes, as due
to Bush's determined drive to declare Martial Law in the US, he is to be given no excuse to claim terrorism can only
be countered by such means. Thus, what has occurred in the UK and in Spain looks like the work of bumbling idiots,
relatively easily countered, rather than a real threat to the safety of the nation.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bush Knew
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bush Knew
Note: written during the May 25, 2002 IRC Session
The Bush Administration was being warned, well outside of the published FBI reports and previous knowledge about
planned terrorist activities. As we stated after the Attack on America, they were being warned by their allies in the UK
and Europe that the arrogance they were showing, the disregard for other nations fortunes, would not be tolerated. This
is not so much a threat put into writing, as private chat and innuendoes. Thus, they were hardly going to warn the
public, as they were too focused on acting normal. The very lack of warning, the decision to say nothing, indicates they were working under a cover-up of the true agendas in operation. As we stated when the entire state of Arizona, in
1997, viewed a mother ship in the skies. It was not the sighting that was impressive, and proof of a cover-up, it was the
delay in reporting! A 3 month delay occurred before several major media outlets reported it. Why the coordinated
delay? This stood as proof of a cover-up, and the cover-up stood as proof of the alien presence. In like manner, the
evidence pointing to the fact that Bush knew shows not that they were simply incompetent, but were so focused on
hiding the threats they were receiving, determined to tough it out and not let the public know why allies would be upset
with them, that they covered up too closely!
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g150.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]
ZetaTalk: Insiders
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Insiders
Note: written on May 15, 2002
Conspiracy theorists have noted that during the World Trade Center attacks, explosions occurred almost immediately in
floors below the strike area, or in the case of the Pentagon, above. The theory is floated that these plane strikes were
assisted by insiders, wanting to create the climate that the Bush Administration has been all too happy to take
advantage of - civil rights limited, the military beefed up, and no questions asked as it's all National Security.
A plane crashing into the side of a tall building does not just break windows, it creates a minor earthquake in the
structure, snapping plumbing, as well as rupturing the fuel tanks. Fuel dropping into a ventilation shaft, mixing
with air, is an ideal explosive mix, and would drop down into the shaft to the floors below. This is what occurred
in the World Trade Center.
Likewise, where a plane crashes into the lower floor of a building, such as the Pentagon, the fuel will not go
down, but spew upward along any avenue it has. Stairwells, for instance, carry not only fuel but fumes, and
mixing with the air and having an updraft handy, this is likewise the direction an explosion would take. The
Pentagon experienced severe fires, an inferno with no place to go. The World Trade Center fires had all four
directions available to them, up, down, and sideways. The Pentagon had the fuel mix going up, creating a heat
barrier so the heat of the burning plane itself could not dissipate upward. Like a blast furnace, encased, this
creates super high heat, which melts many objects otherwise remaining. It is an untrue statement that there were
no plane remains, just not what was expected, and thus rumors abound.
Thus, where those wanting to incite Martial Law in the United States with Oklahoma City and TWA800 and Waco
incidents did not succeed, they were handed an unexpected opportunity in the 911 events. In that these New World
Order types seem delighted to take advantage of these opportunities, the public is rightfully suspicious, but 911 was not
their plan in any manner or degree. Martial Law requires a number of steps outside of what has occurred. The reaction
of the United States public to the restrictions that have been attempted have convinced the architects that full blown
Martial Law would be a mistake. They will rather use the excuse of Homeland Security to the max, and watch the line
so they do not cross it and reveal their true wishes. The constant warning of terrorist acts about to happen are to keep