the best, the first, the fastest) among those who considered politics a game or were into power plays, it also was driven
by a fear factor. What would the other party be able to do, from that vantage point? Rain down death and destruction
with great accuracy? Peek into bedrooms and boardrooms and undress corporate and government lies as well as
personal lies? How could the current status quo, which is to lie to the people one governs, to lie to business partners and competitors alike, and to lie to the auditors, one’s family, one’s neighbors and church - continue? The thought of
having to be honest is discombobulating to those who have lied since childhood and done this as a way of life during
their professions as politicians, executives, or lawyers. Thus, the ability to put up spy satellites was deemed a strong
offensive against any other party unable to do likewise.
Though the Russian were the first into space, with Sputnik, the US soon dominated and has more satellites up than
publicly acknowledged. They have come to rely upon them, as the easier means of snooping compared to sending in
live bodies that can be seduced and lie to their handlers and switch sides. So much safer having that live feed recorded.
The allies of the US shared this information, at least in part, which was a strong reason to become an ally of the US in
the past. So why are England and others in Europe in an uproar over Echelon, which monitors electronic transmissions
as well as what can be seen from space? What changed? As the Attack on America on September 11, 2001
demonstrated, all is not well within the ranks of the elite who would remain on top during and through the coming
changes. There will be winners and losers - those who drown on islands going under the rising sea level and those who
live smugly in the highlands and deny immigration, those whose assets retain their worth due to manipulation in the
financial market and those who find themselves holding worthless paper, those with influence over the populace and
those whose voices are like noise that gets ignored.
England no longer trusts the US, since the maneuver of wrenching the Presidential election from the rightful electee,
Gore. Where this was deemed a partisan issue in the press, it was clear to those who knew otherwise that strong arm
tactics were going to be allowed, done boldly and without shame or fear of repercussion. Anything goes. Corporate
interests in the US would be pushed overriding all agreements with other countries or the law. This had been the
Republican agenda in any case, increasingly, but now all the stops would be pulled. Arms agreements with Russia
tossed into the wastebasket. Refusal to even consider Global Warming issues, the current explanation for the wild
weather devastating the entire globe, in the Kyoto summit. America first, always, and to hell with anyone else. No
ethics. No regret. And thus deep distrust of a former ally has developed in all countries still publicly calling the US a
friend.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g128.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:07 AM]
ZetaTalk: Terror Tactics
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Terror Tactics
Note: written on Oct 15, 2001
Following the attack on America on September 11, 2001 there was immediate consideration of what might be next -
poison gas, poisoned water, hazardous materials, nuclear bombs, car bombs, or the mass sickness that could be caused
by bioterrorism. All these means, of course, had been used throughout history and in many countries and by many
groups with varying agendas. Any consideration of what might be next should include, first and foremost,
consideration of what a group might have to gain or lose.
Poison gas is quickly diluted and is therefore most notably used by those committing suicide, such as the carbon
monoxide deaths easily arranged via a tube from the exhaust from a car. Poison gas has likewise been used
during warfare, such as the mustard gas used during World War I and II. And included in this category must be
the Agent Orange spraying of foliage used by the US in Vietnam, so deadly to the Vietnamese as well as
causing lingering sickness in US soldiers. Poisoning by gas, thus, is more likely to be done by one country to
another during warfare, requiring elaborate paraphernalia and technical support, and highly unlikely to be done
by terrorists who must slip in unnoticed and effect damage quickly.
Poisoned water has long been a means of wiping out a village, or protecting turf, over the ages. Unsafe water is
a factor mankind has had to deal with in any case, as water found standing in ponds or even flowing in streams
can carry organisms causing disease or heavy metals such as lead, so most cases of poisoning by water occur
naturally, not by the hand of man. Man has poisoned himself, in fact, by using utensils that leach lead, or
allowing sewage water to leach into his drinking water, or allowing corporate interests to prevail so that PCBs or
other chemical poisons degrade the quality of life of millions to allow the wealthy few to step higher on their
perch. As deliberate poisoning of water requires massive amounts of chemicals to be added to avoid the poison
being diluted and thus ineffectual, this is also unlikely to be used by terrorists who could not travel encumbered
in this way.
Using some of the poisons corporations regularly manufacture, such as Chlorine or Sulfuric Acid, has been
viewed as a means terrorists might use to create a disaster. It has been found that the groups causing the World
Trade Center disaster also arranged for hazardous material licenses in the US for some of their members.
Clearly, tipping a truck over in a populated area would cause some consternation, but the disaster would be in
the dozens, or at most hundreds, of lives, and has faint chance of success to completion. Trucks designed to
carry these materials have multiple safety guards to prevent such spills, even in the face of a crash or roll-over
on the highway. Thus, once again, this is a case where corporations, not terrorists, create disasters for mankind.
These poisons are released into the soil and air and waterways today, by corporations, once again allowing the
elite few to degrade the quality of life of millions.
The threat of nuclear bombs being manufactured and carried in suitcases into urban areas has long been present,
and is not an unlikely event. The actual portion of an atomic bomb that is lethal is small, but requires supporting
mechanisms in order to do anything but fizzle, so most often these devices do not explode but simply create
radiation poisoning among their handlers. Nevertheless, this threat is real, and could result in a small nuclear
incident near a target, along with some lingering radiation. However, contrary to popular fears, there is little out
there in already manufactured material of a grade that would support such terror tactics. Lower grade nuclear
material abounds, but explosions, to be really effective or even to occur at all, need high grade material, and this
is in the hands of super power countries at present. Low grade nuclear poisoning, of course, occurs at the hands