outside the Green Zone. [and from another] 'I
Saw Fear, He Was Afraid' [Dec 30]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ Ali Al Massedy
was 3 feet away from Saddam Hussein when he
died. The 38 year old, normally Iraqi Prime
Minister Nuri al-Maliki's official videographer, was the man responsible for filming the late
dictator's execution at dawn on Saturday. Ali said he was not authorized to disclose the location,
and did not give other details of the room. He would not give the names of officials in attendance,
though he estimates there were around 20 observers. [and from another] Taliban says Saddam's
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta346.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:16 AM]
ZetaTalk: Saddam's Hanging
execution to intensify jihad [Dec 30] http://www.alertnet.org/ Mullah Obaidullah Akhund, a former
Taliban defence minister and top insurgent commander, also said Saddam's execution on the Eid al-
Adha Muslim festival -- marking the end of the annual pilgrimage to Mecca -- was a provocation.
[and from another] It wasn't Saddam! See Signs of the Times #540-541, and it wasn't his sons they
killed in that shootout, either. See Signs of the Times #139.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta346.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:16 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bali Bombing
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bali Bombing
Note: written during the October 26, 2002 IRC Session
Indonesia is a hotbed of Muslim insurection, in that the government is and has been for decades controlled by
Catholics. Recent years, and especially recent months, have put them in the news when visitors the the island nation
are kidnapped and brutally killed if ransom not paid. This trend has recently spread into Russia, with the drama of an
entire threatre audience held hostage to Muslim protesters. None of this is done at the hand of the Bush Administration,
to support their demands for essential martial law within the US. These situations existed prior to 911, and have their
own force and fury outside of parochial US interests.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g168.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Iraq Civil War
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Iraq Civil War
written Feb 25, 2006
We have often stated that the war in Iraq was part of a larger plan to commandeer the oil fields of the Middle East, to expand into Saudi Arabia and Iran, and thence up into the oil field of Russia via Pakistan. The stage for the current
military action was set in the past, with the friendship of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, who were considered allies
by George Bush Sr. By allowing Saddam to remain in power at the end of the first Gulf War, the stage was set for
George Bush Jr. to insist on finishing his father's work. Of course, seeing the junior Bush into the Presidency at this
time, when the pole shift was anticipated, was in the plan. Thus we had Dubya inserted into the White House by
Supreme Court fiat in 2000, and by voter fraud in 2004. The group who took the White House by coup in 2000 are
marching to the original plan, regardless of setbacks, but are seeing their course changed by opposition, and have
become desperate.
The military is slipping away, revolt endemic, so that orders from the White House cannot be presumed to be
followed.
The Congress is now in revolt, likely to become a Democratic Congress in 2006, and with voter fraud warnings
much in the news and the techniques used in 2004 well publicized, a repeat of this fraud unlikely to succeed.
The American public is up in arms, against Bush and company on all fronts except for his stance on terrorism,
and now with the UAE port deal well publicized, this has crashed also.
International support, such as was required to attack and invade Iraq, is lacking for an attack on Iran, so
attempting a coalition is a lost cause before even being attempted.
The funds required to support the plan have run the US into a record deficit, so that printing money like a
Banana Republic is the only option. Iran's plan to switch to the Euro for oil, leading the way to dropping the
dollar as the world's currency, will create a crisis for the US, as the bottom for funding the plan will drop out
from under the Bush crowd.
One option is to give up the plan, resign to being ousted from the Presidency and control of the Executive Branch, and
go quietly into the night to prepare as any other wealthy citizen might for the pole shift, with a well stocked and
guarded bunker. Does this sound like the arrogant Bush crowd? They hope, as we stated, to create terrorism attacks in
the US, via the UAE port deal, which will allow Martial Law to be called in the US with a mandatory call to service, a draft, imposed. With Bush as President for life, the plan would have new life, or so goes the thinking. Why else is
Bush so adamant about pushing the UAE deal forward, despite opposition on all sides and a drop in the polls? They
are taking desperate measures! Does this include inciting civil war in Iraq? What would the Bush crowd stand to gain,
by increased violence in the Middle East? Note the odd timing of a supposed Al Qaeda attack on a Saudi oil refinery,
the first ever of this scope to be attempted, with civil war in Iraq. Why would one incident incite the other? Al Qaeda
does not identify with the Shia or Sunni, nor would the Saudi attack help either party. But there is a nexus in the
interests of Bush and company.
The only way for the US to incite war with Iran is for the chaos in Iraq to spill over the borders. This would include the
border with Saudi Arabia, who would require US forces to defend their oil reserves, so the story would go, and thus an
occupation there would result. Will this play out as Bush hopes, forcing the US Military to support an increased
presence in the Middle East, an increased scope in the operation? This would be placed in the context of a need to
have a victory, to stay the course. Should this meet opposition, America's dependence on oil from the region would be
emphasized. Will these desperate measures go as planned? One should bear in mind that these affairs are in the hands
of man, and a cornered animal will jump in many directions. Our analysis of the outcome does not include a war with
Iran, nor an occupation of Saudi Arabia, but a gradual and secretive withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, which will
split into factions as a result of their civil war. We predicted that there would be no regime change in Iraq and indeed the Sunni hold the military might during the civil war. Saddam's guard was Sunni, the expertise of war is the Sunni
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta264.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:18 AM]
ZetaTalk: Iraq Civil War
hands, and the man on trial as Saddam is not he, but his cousin, one of his doubles. In the end, the Bush crowd will be required to go quietly into the night, but not before some dramatic games are played within the US itself. That, my