Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bush Mandate
Note: written for the Nov 3, 2002 IRC Session
The mid-term elections in the US were sculpted to be pro or con Homeland Security and War on Terrorism. Anyone
opposing the Bush Administration was soft on security and terrorists, regardless of their argument. Those who had
experienced combat and the horrors of war, surviving maimed, were termed terrorist huggers if they did not rubber
stamp the Bush Administration’s plans, drawn up by civilians and combat avoiders such as the current US President
himself. Anyone questioning the treatment of US citizens, not granted rights in being detained endlessly in
questionable quarters without being charged, was a terrorist hugger. Thus, civil rights out the window and the
Constitution and Bill of Rights used as toilet paper. Given the horror of 911, the first attack on the continental US
ever, and the drum-beat of accusations of anyone opposing the Bush Administration for any reason, the voters decided
to give the President the benefit of the doubt and empower him. Now what?
Those who have discerned that the Bush Administration has an agenda, not spoken but hidden behind the bluster, are
now seeing an administration that stole an election from Gore, the popularly elected President, and is so casual about
civil rights that they are frankly breaking the law by their imprisonment of innocents, without charges, are horrified.
Will war with Iraq not proceed, a virtual martial law in the US be imposed, even without the formality of pronouncing
this? To put this into perspective, it should be stated that the President had the right to instigate war with Iraq before
the elections, even without getting Congressional approval, if he could explain this in terms that include national
defense. The President had the ability to imprison innocents without charges, despite international bluster and national
complaints within the court system, as the memory of 911 was so recent that all who opposed this imprisonment were
termed terrorist huggers. The President also had the ability to impose martial law, via FEMA, as man conspiratorialists
have enunciated, the US Presidential directives having put this in place years ago, in anticipation of the pole shift end
times. So, has anything changed?
At the time of the mid-term elections, the world stands united against the Bush Administration for its plans to attack
Iraq on slight excuse. Terrorist attacks have not been traced to Iraq instigation, countries such as Korea have the bomb
but are being excused, and Russia uses chemical weapons on its own citizens without umbrage. The world is united
against the Bush Administration plans to start a war with Iraq, and even their ally Israel is having domestic problems
with the hard liners. The US economy, despite an artificially maintained Stock Market index, is in the tank, with
economic indicators steadily worsening. Earthquakes under-reporting is finally being noticed, with the quakes now
creating devastation that cannot be ignored. The weather has reached the point of being beyond argument, with the
common man wondering what will come next, at this rate. Those in the US Military who have experienced combat are
horrified at the prospect of a casual war with no grounds except ambition, while the Bush Administration is attempting
to supplant the military command with those clubby with Bush, civilians or those without combat experience all.
Given that the arrogant and ambitious Bush Administration can be expected to assume a Bush Mandate, what is likely
to occur?
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g171.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:20 AM]
ZetaTalk: Backlash
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Backlash
Note: written for the Nov 3, 2002 IRC Session
Where ambition is tied up in argument, haranguing, and lack of automatic approval, those concerned with stopping
Bush would sit back and allow the squabble to proceed. This is what would have occurred if the Democrats had taken
the Senate firmly in the elections. The economy, civil rights, and concern for the health and well being of the citizens
of the country would have prevailed, at least in argument, and thus thwarted the Bush Administration plans. Where
those with raw ambitions, and dictatorial tendencies, such as the Bush Administration has exhibited, are given what
they presume to be a mandate, those who are opposed to the outcome must take action, as without action the
ambitions run amuck, driving the country into war, the world into chaos, and the citizenry into subservience under a
dictatorship that has nothing to do with the well-being of the citizens. How then do those who consider that:
1. a pole shift might not happen, and the Republican Party would have to live with the aftereffects of such an
autocratic regime.
2. a war might be instigated where the US Military would be required to fight in the Middle East endlessly, with
no goal in sight except capture of oil producing countries for the Bush cartel.
3. allies world wide, such as Russia, who hold the bomb, might be driven by the disruption in the Middle east to
the extent that they would cease to become allies, driving the US into isolation and a defensive posture.
4. the economic repercussions of isolation would reduce the US to an economic crawl, eliminating hope of
recovery for decades, especially under the cloud of a Republican leadership that was akin to Hitler in its lack of
foresight and treatment of the citizens of the world.
Place into the posture of those thus concerned the wealthy elite of the world, which includes the banking cartels, global
corporations, and the US Military as well as the governing elite of other super powers in the world. How would they
treat an arrogant strutting brat, full of himself in his assumption that what he terms a Bush Mandate has been given to
him, and about to start a war which the world has warned should not be undertaken for simply the obvious ambitions
of the war monger? They will eliminate him, promptly, and all about him who fail to take the message will likewise to
eliminated from power. Thus, the rumors of a potential assassination, akin to the JFK assassinations which had little to
do with the stated excuse, may become a reality.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g172.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:20 AM]
ZetaTalk: Walk-In
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Walk-In
Note: written during the Nov 9, 2002 IRC Session
The current US President is not a strong individual, as much as a puppet. A drunk in his younger years, with cocaine
addiction running in the family, hard, this is not a likely family to be strong against the coming times. Chosen for his
weakness, he will likely start to falter when times get tight and explanations are demanded of him. It will not so much