be his failure to care for the populace he is sworn to serve that will bother him, as the failure of plans the elite have
laid that will not pan out. Thus, he will turn to the bottle, and if restricted, will start to mentally falter. Given slips, and
inability to go on stage, he will likely be assassinated by his handlers. However, failing this, a walk-in is likely, as a
possession would be so obvious that assassination would become immediate.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g173.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:21 AM]
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
written Aug 19, 2005
I am concerned about all the reports about military coup happening. 4-Star General gets canned. Is there
really a war going on behind the scenes between the Bush crowd and the powers that be? I am trying to
figure out all the gossip about a military coup. Where are we headed? And what is behind the exorbitant
crude oil prices? Any Zetas comments on this?
We stated when Bush stole the 2004 election that the Puppet Master was furious, as he had wanted a respected Viet Nam vet, John Kerry, to bring a rebelling US military into line, a situation that certainly would not occur with Bush
continuing in office. Why does the Puppet Master care? Because the US Military has and is being used to protect his
assets and interests, at home and abroad. The massive US Military, equal in size to the combined military of all other
countries in the world, has bases everywhere, and the man with the gun gets cooperation with US interests abroad.
Chosen as much for their weaknesses as for any skill or political savvy they may posses, Puppets are expected to allow their strings to be pulled, once installed into office, but Bush and those around him had let the power of the US
Military go to their heads. They would be king. They would commandeer all the oil fields in the world, and control what they foresee as the prime commodity in the Aftertime, black gold.
Bush busting promptly began, the first volley financial. Despite all lies to the contrary, the health of the US economy is plunging, more layoffs, more bankruptcies, overinflated and underfunded and utterly dependent upon investors from
abroad. What has the situation been since the 2004 election was stolen? Rising interest rates at the Federal Reserve,
which the Puppet Master controls, while the US economy plunges. Logical only when one considers that the Puppet
Master plans to decapitate the US bureaucracy, and plunging the US government into a financial crisis with a sudden
withdrawal of funds from the Fed and from countries abroad which he has great influence with, will be one weapon at
his disposal. Bush, meanwhile, having formerly been an alcoholic, is now drunk on continued spending sprees, his
foray into Iraq a hemorrhage he refuses to address. Weapon one - financial disaster, with the US Congress frantically
looking to cut expenses in the face of the Bush Administration's adamant insistence that their conquest of oil fields
continue, and now into Iran.
The second Bush busting volley is unveiling political corruption within the Bush Administration. Shall we count the
ways this has emerged? The Downing Street memo, demonstrating clearly that Bush lied to the public about his plans
to invade Iraq; the Valerie Plame outing, which has Karl Rove and the office of Dick Cheney front and center and is
currently before a grand jury; war profiteering via Haliburton, with contracts skipping the bidding process and
fraudulent invoices being rewarded with bonuses. Where this is not yet seen as removing Bush from office, it has an
eroding effect on the Congress and the public. Little by little the fingers of loyalty weaken and let go. Where the public
stance is loyalty to a President that had been sworn in, in front of a Congress that failed to challenge the 2004 election,
the depth of this loyalty is now paper thin. Election fraud, via Diebolt voting machines that had votes for 1/3 of the
nation recorded without a paper trail and the central tabulating machines admittedly editable from a laptop in a parking
lot nearby - all ignored by the loyal Republican Congress. With the 2006 elections approaching in the Fall of 2005,
should a Congressman worry? Weapon two - the changing face of Congress.
The third Bush busting volley is eroding public sentiment for what Bush had hoped would be a war time Presidency.
What war? The one that was waged based on a lie? The one that was for any reason but to defend America from
terrorism? The one that was to make America free from worry, a safer place? For public sentiment to erode, the media
must cooperate, and anyone taking the pulse of the media lately must admit there has been a change. Look behind the
newscasters to see the hand at the helm of the major media outlets. It is not Bush and company. Though they can
suppress reports by asserting a national security rational, they cannot dictate the tenor and tone of the news. Where the
Downing Street memo received little press, Karl Rove was dragged about on major media endlessly for his alleged role
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta236.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Decapitation Process
in the Plame outing. Public exposes are not over in this battle for the hearts and minds of the US public, as more are in
the wings and awaiting their time. The public has already decided they no longer approve of their President, not for his
performance in Iraq, nor on the economy, and there is little left except respect for the Office of President to shore him
up. Weapon three - an angry public.
What is the synergy, during a decapitation process, between economic quagmires, Congressional alarm, public
disgruntlement, and the Military balking? Each magnifies the other. A war effort that has strong public support does
not get challenged by Congress, regardless of legalities. A President viewed as genuinely concerned about the public
interests is forgiven economic quagmires by the public. And when the argument is that national security is at stake, the
safety of the American public at issue, then the media hesitates to criticize the leadership. But when this leadership has
been exposed as utterly lacking in integrity, out for self profit, and breaking both the intent and letter of the law with
aplomb, what then? When Congress begins to vote against the Bush White House wishes, what then? When the public
polls show the support for the President and his policies diving for the bottom, what then? A feeding frenzy begins.
Where this has terrified some within the Bush White House, the prevailing mode has been stubborn refusal to change.
This is not the resolve of strength, but the rigidity of the weak. This is the 2 year old, having a tantrum, insisting on his
way.
Enter the role of the military. They were, of course, disappointed to have as their assigned Commander-in-Chief a man
who avoided his duty during the Viet Nam war to the extent of being AWOL in the reserves. The truth of this was not
lost on the military, which has its own information channels, but the military is restrained from speaking out against a