Inquisition in the Middle Ages.’ [Note: regarding the pedophilia coverup, the new Pope will ensure
it.]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta216.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: Attempt to Dominate
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Attempt to Dominate
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995
Regarding direct conflict situations in human society, where one human desires to overtly dominate another, where
excuses for the one who wishes to dominate can not be made. Can humans do more to defer these situations than they
presently do? The answer is, unfortunately, no. During this density, the 3rd Density, which is the human condition at
this time, there is not a clear division between Service-to- Self and Service-to-Others. Humans are deciding.
Therefore, confusion exists between humans as to the motive of another human. Is the behavior because the other
human is in need, is insecure, has been harmed in the past, is unduly fearful and in need of reassurance, is being
protective of others, or has misunderstood?
All these paths are explored in the human mind when dealing with an attempt at domination from another human.
Should the answer to any of the above be yes, then the needs of the other human are addressed, and the attempt at
domination is taken not as an offense but as a symptom. However, there are those times when the attempt at
domination is from a human who is strongly oriented to Service-to-Self, and is into power games. In general these
situations are recognized by other humans for the game it is. All is balanced except when the human desiring to
dominate is much in ascension over the other. Here is the opportunity for sadism, whether mental or physical, and the
human strongly oriented to Service-to-Self can scarcely resist. To overcome the normal human resistance to pain or
torment, and the normal human societal protections against this, is a power trip for the Service-to-Self.
In the next density, 4th Density, these individuals are separated so as to be forced to deal with themselves. Individuals who would be strongly taken advantage of by those of Service-to-Self orientation, the Service- to-Others, are also
separated, to be with their own kind. But during 3rd Density, the decision to fall to one or the other orientation is
hastened by the struggle that victims and perpetrators, as well as witnesses must endure. A given situation is not
caused by the victims actions, as who truly wants to be victimized? Society deals with its grief by accusing the victim.
In dealing with a situation of domination and victimization, there are three possible postures.
The victim, who learns how this situation feels, and thus may learn empathy.
The perpetrator, who goes on a power trip, but if given to empathy also experiences remorse for the action and a
determination not to repeat the action.
The witness, who has an opportunity to step in, at risk to self, and thus can experience the empowerment of
group action toward good, or the diminishment of empowerment from being intimidated.
All these are opportunities for growth, in one direction or the other, and this is the major lesson of 3rd Density.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o13.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Aggression
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Aggression
Note: written May 15, 1997
A common misperception among humans is the assumption that higher spiritual densities are removed from any
emotion except love, and have no destructive urges. The matter of being Service-to-Other does not entail removing oneself from the many conflicts that present during incarnated life. The point where one defends the self, or others,
and crosses the line into destructive behavior is not the point where the entity becomes, however briefly, oriented in Service-to-Self. Service-to-Others does not mean allowing the other to proceed without bounds in a manner that hurts
the self. Self defense is not only assumed, it is desirable! Any entity that became utterly passive and failed to defend itself would not last long. Self defense is integral in any life form, and can hardly be removed, nor should it be.
There is much confusion regarding defensive or aggressive actions being taken by those operating in the Service-to-
Other orientation. Empathy toward others and non-violent means of attending to life’s daily affairs are assumed, and
under equitable conditions this is the norm. However, if others who are not firmly in the Service-to-Other orientation or even if others also in the Service to-Other group are undertaking actions that threaten the well being of the self or of the group, aggressive and even violent means are not out of keeping with the Service-to-Other orientation! Forcefully
restraining another, or even killing them if this is the most effective solution, is not only a Service-to-Self perogative.
These are solutions open to those in the Service-to-Other also.
In dealing with, for instance, a sadist preying upon the young, an inability to safeguard the young by any other means
than killing the sadist would not be out of keeping with the Service-to-Other philosophy. Which other is being served
by allowing him to continue? The young children, as a group of others, or the sadist as a single individual utterly
lacking in consideration of others? The choice is clear, and killing the sadist a solution involving empathy and
kindness overall. In fact, allowing the sadist to continue is anti Service-to-Other, as this passivity is making those standing by and doing nothing a party to the sadism.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o49.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Turn the Other Cheek
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Turn the Other Cheek
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995
What should be done when a human finds they are being victimized, for whatever reason? Most certainly they should
not simply cry "Pity me" and do nothing! Much has been made of the Christian adage, turn the other cheek. In India, it is much touted that the British were routed because Ghandi engaged them with passive resistance. Does this ploy not
work? Sometimes. In the main, this ploy does not work. Passive resistance, or returning violence with love, works only in the circumstances where the attacker is basically of a good heart. The soldier ordered to press forward, for
instance, where he personally has misgivings. Where former victims are inciting violence, here the protagonist drawn
into a conflict may find they can turn the situation around, to where injuries are addressed rather than conflict
escalated, by returning love for antagonism.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/orientat/o11.htm[2/5/2012 11:22:13 AM]
ZetaTalk: Good Samaritan