level can only go up also. Thus, where this cannot be computed by man, being a missing dynamic in his statistics, this
is the explanation for why our 675 foot rise does not compute given the known factors - water volume and increase per
degree of heat rise.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p164.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:42 AM]
ZetaTalk: Rebirth
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Rebirth
Note: written prior to July 15, 1995
The Earth of the future will clear up. There are several factors that affect the Earth's health. For one, the cataclysms
will make changes. The Earth's population will reduce by 90%. Polluting practices, such as burning oil and chemical
additives, will essentially stop. Life, such as continues, will be primitive. Massive land changes will occur, with land
rising from the ocean depths and existing land sinking below the sea. Rain fall will be almost continuous, washing the
newly raised land of its salts. Pollutants, such as chemical processing plants, will be dispersed worldwide. And the
atmosphere, with its many problems, will be reformed afresh.
The Earth recovers from a shift in relationship to its location relative to active volcanoes, in the main. The skies
clear first where this dust is in the high altitudes, not in the wind-drift from fresh ash just raised. 5 years after
the shift, even 2 years after the shift, some sporadic sunlight will warm the Earth. Those areas not getting direct,
unclouded, sunlight will notice an increase in intensity, through the clouds. It is possible even under clouds to
get a sunburn, so clouds are not a death sentence to vegetation. 10 years after the shift, many parts of the globe
will consider themselves back to normal, although their memory will be failing them in this regard. So much
better than before, that it seems like heaven! Other parts of the globe, in the down-drift from volcanoes, will feel
like Moses, enduring 40 years in the Valley of Death, where nothing lives.
Edibility and availability of native weeds and grasses after the shift, as a source of food for humans and
livestock and even wildlife, depends upon the location, entirely. In some parts of the world, life will virtually
close down. This is near volcanoes, under the drifting ash, or where polar cold descends. In other parts of the
world, there will within two years be abundant grasses or weeds. For instance, the new land emerging between
Antarctica and Africa, will be moist, temperate, highly fertile, and without competition from livestock or seed
from most weeds. Any seed landing there will flourish!
In areas not in the path of volcanic ash, but affected by the overall gloom, one might estimate a 50% reduction
in sunlight and crop success. For instance, if a crop needed strong sunlight to flourish, it might barely get to
producing seed before the season ends. In nature, this would reproduce the weed, but for crops, it would not be a
return. Survivors will soon find what crops manage to give a return, and what not! Another factor is rot, the
moisture level, which will be extreme. Mold will be everywhere, dampness, bugs, and those crops that tolerate
damp conditions coming through, others failing utterly. Root crops, where they provide a survivor in the
evolution chain due to the energy in these roots or tubers, do not do well enough after a pole shift due to the wet
ground and mold about.
Also, consider the wildlife and bugs, which are likewise hungry. Food under the surface can be reached and
eaten while the exhausted humans sleep, where fences are less likely to be breached. This is not an easy answer,
as it depends so much on local, and what each survivor or group is familiar with planting and harvesting, so the
variables are immense. If a crop can be grown in the dim, the damp, and is not susceptible to mice or moles, yet
carries nutrition, it is a winner! Remember, likewise, that you can eat bugs, if they manage to eat your crops!
Trees will in the main die, as they do not have stores of energy that can be tapped, and rely on annual sunlight to
maintain those portions of themselves that are live. Then how do trees survive, shift after shift? Seedlings, in
fact, survive better, and many seeds do not sprout until years later. It only takes a few sprouting seeds to
perpetrate the species. Seedlings are tiny compared to the giant parent, and thus can move along with fewer
nutrients. In fact, it is the seedling trees, growing a few years after the shift, that should be nurtured, not the
dying parents. Just as after a forest fire, these are the trees of the future!
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p02.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:43 AM]
ZetaTalk: Rebirth
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p02.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:43 AM]
ZetaTalk: Seeds of Rebirth
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Seeds of Rebirth
Note: written prior to July 15, 1995
Regarding why people should be concerned about ecology, when a doomsday scenario is approaching. One should
ponder what will happen as humanity considers the nearing comet. Should one continue to save, regularly, for a rainy
day? For retirement? Or should one cash in one's savings and enjoy it while one may? Many people need little excuse
to have a party as it is. This philosophy can be applied to the resources of the Earth, its rain forests and wet lands,
where the seeds of rebirth lie. These lands belong to someone. They are, so to speak, cash in the bank. Beyond the
desire to party, there is the desire to meet everyday needs. The earth will experience weather disruption, where
torrential rainstorms and drought will increase. Crop failure will be rampant, especially coming into the year of the
comet. What government, seeing the starving populace, would not be tempted to throw all ecological concerns to the
wind?
What would be the repercussions of this? One has but to look at history, the lost Mastodon, for instance. This great
and healthy animal roved many continents, in great numbers, but was wiped out during a single cataclysm. It takes but
a single mating pair to renew the herd, yet they are lost. During every cataclysm numerous species are lost, forever. It
is not a matter of sacrificing ecology for humanity, as they are not in a contest. They in fact are brethren in the desire
to survive. Mankind cannot live without a healthy Earth. It is the bed which mankind lies in. There is no benefit to
destroying the rain forests to
feed humanity. Cropland freed from rain forests will not produce during the months and years preceding the cataclysm.
Neither will filled wetlands. And what possible benefit can come from pouring poisons into the rivers and over the
land, in the form of pollution?
Those saved by ignoring ecological concerns are not the humanity in need. Those saved by ignoring ecological
concerns are the powerful and comfortable, who will be the last to starve when food is short. Efforts at pollution