deliberate flubs, so the public begins to look upon these formerly staunch bastions of unquestioned scientific authority
with new eyes. All will begin to be questioned, and the public looking at everything that is stated with new eyes, new
scrutiny, and seeing patterns and discovering information that was formerly being aggressively hidden. The IAU points
to an asteroid, claiming it will certainly come close to earth in 2028, and the next day the distance is corrected. Then it
unfolds that this asteroid is not the soonest nor the closest known! Why was this done, the public must ask, and in
combination with the myths about Orion and a rogue planet inbound from that direction, has already raised eyebrows.
NASA reluctantly agrees to film the Face on Mars and then delivers a negative to the public, claiming a
misunderstanding though such misunderstandings do not occur with their other publications. Why was this done, the
public must ask, and in concert with revelations by the Pope that the church now believes that alien visitors are real
and not demonic, will cause many to suspect there is truth to rumors of a cover-up by the government, which has
denied the alien presence all along.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p96.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Comet Visible
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Comet Visible
Note: The Comet Visible ZetaTalk piece was written in 1995, and should be read in that context. This inbound planet was visible to the IRAS team, using full
spectrum search (including infra-red) in 1983 as a Magnitude 2 object. Due to the amount of time it spends essentially between its two foci, a search without infra-red
capability should assume a Magnetide 10 object and require the use of an observatory grade scope until the mid-point of 2002. In early 2001, it was sighted at three
observatories as a Magnitude 11 object. Magnitude 10 should also be used as equipment is usually calibrated for the pinpoint of light that stars emit, not the dull glow
of a brown dwarf. See the Rogue Planet TEAM page for these sightings that started, using an observatory grade scope, in early 2001. When the Zetas state it is visible
with the naked eye, they are referring to being visible by the eye, as aided by telescope or magnifying equipment.
The 12th Planet is now visible to the human eye, though only the educated eye would see it. At the current time the
12th Planet is approximately magnitude 2.0 in brightness, and appears as large as a star as viewed by the naked eye. It
does not shine with the intensity of most stars, but has a dull, diffuse, glow. It appears to be the last gasp of a dying
star, a faint, blurry, reddish glow. Your eye would pass over it if attuned to the pin points that are the stars. A star is
intense in the center and rapidly diminishes in intensity toward the edges of the spot you call a star. The light from a
star comes from a single point and fans out, the periphery a bit less than the center, increasingly, but the center very
intense. The 12th Planet, being nearer, is giving you light rays from its entire surface, so the light has an even quality
to it. Its distance cannot be measured, but one will notice that as time passes, no other object passes before it. Comet
Watch can assist.
Your nearby planets are throwing back at you a familiar light, reflected sunlight, and thus your eyes recognize them for
what they are. Just as some insects camouflage themselves from those who would prey on them by adopting the
coloration of the surrounding area, just so the 12th Planet, to you, is camouflaged against the night sky. Its appearance
does not look like the familiar objects you set out to identify when you scan the sky - pin points with intense centers
that are stars or the scattered brilliance of an exploding star or the distinctive elongated fantail of a passing comet.
Where its size at present is akin to a star, and the diffuse light across its surface would indeed have the spread and
consistency that your reflecting planets do, there are significant differences that cause you to pass over it rather than
explore it in depth.
1. the composition is not the composition of reflecting sunlight, but is almost exclusively in the spectrum you
would call red light. Thus you will do best if you filter for red light, and by this we mean filtering out all but red
light.
2. though a large planet, 4 times as large as Earth and thus larger than Mars or Pluto, it is at this time at a much
greater distance and thus its visibility is not equivalent to Mars or Pluto.
The amateur astronomer may be disappointed until well after the millennium, as the 12th Planet's motions across the
skies are only visible at this time when repeated images are taken and compared by computer, and here the
magnification must be huge. Where the naked eye looks upon the sky, the 12th Planet appears to be standing still. The
path of the comet is dead on. It is aiming for your Sun, and you are so very close to your Sun. The Earth's movements
to this side or that are slight, in the scheme of things, and give to the comet an almost imperceptible wobble at best.
The naked eye will not see motion in this 12th Planet until well into the year of the cataclysms, just a few weeks
ahead. At that time its motion will give it away as being of a comet's nature. During the last few weeks, back yard
astronomers will be able to detect motion of the comet across the skies, something a distant star would not do. Those
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p29.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Comet Visible
with telescopes and computer software capable of comparing captured and stored images will know otherwise, but will
be silenced or discredited in the usual establishment protective manner.
This 12th Planet will, however, get consistently brighter, so that an image taken now, compared with an image taken a
year from now, would show an increased brightness not expected from a distant star. The naked eye would not capture
this. The naked eye will begin to register increased brightness approximately 1 year 7 months before the cataclysms
[Note: see 2003 Date explanation. 1 year 7 months computes to May 15, 2003, a deliberate wrong date.], or late in the year 2001. This appearance will be discounted by most, who will point to the distortions in the atmosphere as a cause or will explain
this as an exploding star, the light rays of which are just becoming visible on Earth. Increased brightness will occur
gradually, so that without the capacity to register brightness over time, and compare closely the changes, this cannot be
proved or even, until close to the end, mentally registered by the observer. High powered equipment can and has
registered this increased brightness. The images must be compared by computer analysis, but the magnification need
not be huge, only slight. Here again, this information will not be made public. Quite the opposite. This information