Thus, for a viewer on a high vantage point on land, looking south toward Orion from the Northern Hemisphere in the
winter, the Equator must be considered in an offset, making Planet X look further south that would otherwise be the
case. For a viewer in the Southern Hemisphere, no such change will occur. In giving Global Coordinates, we consider
all parts of the globe, giving coordinates that will put Planet X within the scope, thus almost all viewers find some
offset when they discover it.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p151.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:27 AM]
ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation
Note: written on Jan 15, 2001 during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
Could the Earth be slowing in its rotation, as Planet X draws near, when the populace can go out at midnight on
December 21st and find the constellation Orion in the proper place, year after year? Oh, the populace could go out on
December 21st and find Orion in the proper position, this is not the issue. The issue is that December 21st would have
moved to be later than if all the clocks were ticking along as designed, 24 hours a day, and leap seconds only inserted
every few decades. Where the master clock is in the hands of the US Navy, which has been in the center of the secrecy
over Planet X and related matters for almost half a century, this is not a difficult feat. All network computers in the
world, ultimately, sync with the US Navy master clock, most by the networks dialing in during the night and adjusting.
A second here, a second there, and it is always assumed to be the peripheral computers that are off, a bit, when an
adjustment is made! Unless an individual is astute, and notices the increased adjustments required to their watches and
clocks, they assume they are the problem, not the master clocks that run the world. Where clocks can be tweaked, the
Moon is not so cooperative, and thus it takes longer and longer for the Earth to line up to where it can sight a full
moon from the same spot.
The existence of publications on the phases of the Moon and related Eclipse projections forced the Navy to make early
adjustments for the lagging rotation of the Earth. These publications rely on the Navy, the time-keeper of the world, in
practice if not officially. When Planet X was located in 1983 by the IRAS team, various scenarios were played out in
think-tanks, covering a multitude of aspects. As the time-keepers of the world, the Navy had already noticed a slowing
rotation, so slight as to pass notice by the general public. Tasked with keeping the public unaware of the approach of
Planet X for as long as possible, the Navy determined:
1. to inject leap-seconds surreptitiously via its master clock. Since the Internet and networking computer systems
synchronize with this master clock, most often on an automated basis, daily, these adjustments would be slight
and pass notice.
2. to defer scrutiny of this activity by setting aside the official leap-second insertion practice. This deferral was
requested by the Navy but did not get broad support from its member community.
3. to adjust predicted dates and times for the Moon and related Eclipses forward so that by the time alarm over the
potential of a Planet X approach was under discussion around the world, the relationship of the Moon to the
Earth would seem to dispel the notion that the Earth was slowing.
Thus, they changed their predicted data to assume a slowing Earth, and hoped their calculations on the rate of slowing
were correct. Of key importance were publications that put out 5 year or 1 year forward stats on phases of the moon
and eclipses. These publications plan their printed matter at least a full year ahead, updating with the very latest data
from the Navy projections during that year. Thus, when anticipating the worst of the slowing to occur in 2002, and
assuming a 5 year forward publication to be the most broadly accessed after a yearly calendar, and adding that extra
year for publication preparation, and considering that 5 year forward publications for 2002 would start at the first of the
year, they calculated that changes to their stats needed to be done by the end of 1994. These manipulations did two
very obvious things to their stats:
1. the actual phases of the Moon were out of sync with their stats during 1995 and for the immediate years
following. However, since the public in general refers to printed matter that had been printed much earlier, and
was based on Navy stats gathered prior to the manipulation, this would likely not be noticed by the public.
2. the Navy stats related to the rotation of the Earth (the phases of the Moon and Earth Seasons), would be out of
sync with past data, should someone run these numbers.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p127.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p127.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Trend Data
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Trend Data
Note: written on Jun 15, 2001.
To understand trends that show up on charts reflecting the date and time of Full Moons and the Equinox, bear in mind
that you are analyzing Navy data and not just the actual progress of the moon and earth. Look at this from the
standpoint of the Navy, and what they were tasked with. Indeed, it has taken a slight amount of time more for the
slowing earth to arrive lined up for the Equinox. This is a sync point taken at midnight and thus not easily fudged, so
reflects the actual slowdown, unannounced, to date. This is the trend line for Equinox, taking more time to arrive, and
is the more obvious as it has only one factor to consider, the Earth's orbit around the Sun. The Equinox is computed,
by the Navy, and only actually measured every 4 years (in accordance with leap year syncing). This is because during
the 4 years that it takes to complete a leap year cycle, the Equinox per definition is around the globe, probably 1/4 turn
each turn or so each year for a given Spring or Fall Equinox. Why don't they do an actual measure as it goes around
the globe? Because most of the equator, or a good part of it, is over ocean. To measure the exact split second that the
sun tips over the equator would require more stability than a ship can provide. Wave bobble, and the ship to be certain
it is at the exact coordinates must use guidance systems that could be off a hair, etc. So they rely on a computated
Equinox for 3 out of 4 years. But then they do measure the Equinox from a set physical land position, every four years,
and this is what is late to arrive (at that physical point!).
The Full Moon operates differently, as this has two factors to consider, the moon's orbit around the Earth as well as the
turning of the Earth, and thus is more varied and less easy for the general public to follow. We have mentioned that to