disagreement. We will explain with a couple of examples.
Conditional love: A mother loves her children, and this is for many reasons. They are an extension of herself, and their achievements reflect on her upbringing and genes. They promise to grow up and take care of her in her old age. They assist with the household chores, and can be relied upon in emergencies. They liven up her life, bringing friends into the house and news and jokes and always the unexpected. Life is not dull. The mother feeding and clothing her
children is considered automatically to be a loving mother. What happens when the child refuses to fit into one of
these expectations. Perhaps one of the children is uncommonly independent, and refuses companionship to the mother
when she desires this. The child has his reasons, but the mother only sees this as rejection. She feels much resentment, and finds she is reluctant to do the special things formerly done for the child. She has stopped loving this child, as her love is conditional on his meeting her expectations.
Unconditional love: In this same situation, where the mother finds one of her children to be a disappointment, the
mother does not stop meeting the child's needs, as formerly. This does not mean that she does not feel disappointment, or even air her grievances to the child or others. This does mean that the loving support she gives to this child
continues, whether or not the child has disappointed her in some way.
Conditional love is therefore seen as a lever, to force another to cooperate, and unconditional love allows the issue to be deal with squarely, as the only issue, and not be clouded by other issues. For instance, in the above example, the mother can loudly complain about lack of companionship, and this issue dealt with openly. In conditional love the
companionship matter may be dealt with, openly or not, but in any case other issues have arisen, such as failure to feed and clothe or pass messages along or whatever the mother formerly did for the child. This in fact prevents the issue from being dealt with as a single issue, as it becomes weighed in the mother's favor. The issue is clouded by http://www.zetatalk2.com/rules/r11.htm[2/5/2012 11:36:58 AM]
ZetaTalk: Unconditional Love
secondary issues. The mother, by applying conditional love, is being in fact dictatorial.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/rules/r11.htm[2/5/2012 11:36:58 AM]
ZetaTalk: Without Money
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Without Money
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Money is nonexistent in 4th Density Service-to-Others. Let us explain why this would be so. What is money? A
medium of exchange. Something of consistent value, or at least stable value, which allows the barter system to take place in a more abstract manner. If one grows and markets apples, for instance, they do not have to haul around a bag of apples in order to purchase milk or pay the rent, although this option is still open to the apple grower. Without money, the apple grower must haul apples about, and this is tiresome and such matters as spoilage must be dealt with.
However, the existence of money, which has been called the root of all evil, supports activities that give no value in and of themselves.
What benefit, truly, are the virtual gambling casinos that go by names such as Stock Exchange, Commodity Market, or Bond Market? This benefits those who can manipulate faster, or with a more clever sleight of hand, but benefit the
overall not one wit. These activities are in fact parasitic on the overall, as the operators must be fed and housed, yet contribute nothing. Often, in fact, they benefit at the expense of the very people who should benefit - those who
produce. The principal beneficiaries of money gambling arenas are those already wealthy, who hire clever gamblers
who in the main stop at nothing to succeed. The laws governing this activity do not stop lies, theft, or evasion of regulation. This is due to the pressure and inducements that the wealthy place on legislators. The little guy loses, again.
So, how do 4th Density societies function without money, a medium of exchange? Money is used to indicate to others
what the individual has earned or has a right to spend. However money is presented, whether cash, a line of credit, a credit card with a balance under the credit limit, antiques or jewelry with an appraised value, real estate with an appraised value - all indicate that the holder can spend or exchange goods to this amount. What this also means is that without such proof of worth, the individual cannot spend, and is on charity. At this point the individual gets free food and lodging from either the government or charitable organizations, or goes out on the street as so many do. For
simplicity's sake, you can consider 4th Density Service-to-Others to operate as though everyone were a charity case.
We will be explicit.
The apple grower, when in need of some item other than the apples he grows, simply goes and takes them. Likewise,
others simply come and take apples, as needed. If there are too few apples, then there is distress communicated
telepathically and a meeting of the group is called, or perhaps the issue has come up during the regular meetings. As there is distress, others in the group weigh their current activities in light of the new need, and discuss alternatives.
Essentially, someone who may be on sabbatical in order to devote to learning may cut this short to assist, or someone who has taken responsibility for doing laundry may find they have extra time on their hands, and volunteer. Or, it may be that in weighing the activities of all, the conclusion of the group is that apples are of less importance, and an agreement is reached to parse the existing supply out more carefully.
In this way, money is replaced by communication and cooperation, and this works just fine.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/rules/r09.htm[2/5/2012 11:36:59 AM]
ZetaTalk: Implants
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Implants
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Implants are without a doubt the most talked about contactee phenomena. Where other matters are in fact more
common than the implant phenomena, implants get the most press. Abduction phenomenon such as the contactee's
awareness of man's place in the Universe, an increase in telepathic communications most often cited as the contactee's psychic ability, and first time occurrences of the Out-Of-Body experience or astral projection as it is sometimes called
- are more common. Why this focus on implants?
Humans regularly tag wild life in order to track it, tag their domestic animals so they can be found if lost, tag their cars so ownership can be proved, etch their name on the backs of valuable items, assign numbers such as the Social
Security Number to identify each other, and expect their spouse to wear a ring. Ownership. A man is assumed to be
thus owned by his wife as he wears her ring, his government as his Social Security Number tags him wherever he
goes, his employer as his entry badge marks him as a component of the whole, his church as he is on the roster, and his house as he cannot function without an address. For those who say that the man is the one in possession, we would point out the many ways he has been tagged by his so-called possessions, and fettered by them, and dragged about by them. He is not free. He is tagged, and intuitively understands this.