This utterance is quite remarkable. To say that the ancients ‘completed the art and science of expression’ means that there is nothing left for subsequent writers to do but to imitate; and Lovecraft in fact goes on to say that ‘those modern periods have been most cultivated, in which the models of antiquity have been most faithfully followed’. What Lovecraft ignores here is that even in the eighteenth century it was the adaptation of classical models to the contemporary world that produced the most viable literature of the period. The brilliance of Johnson’s London or Pope’s Dunciad stems not from their aping of the forms of Roman satire but from their application of these forms to vivify very modern concerns.
With attitudes like these, it is not surprising that Lovecraft was, throughout the course of his amateur career, forced to defend himself against those who felt that his criticism was both too harsh and misguided. Lovecraft addresses the issue in several essays, including ‘Amateur Criticism’ (Conservative, July 1918) and ‘Lucubrations Lovecraftian’ (United Co-operative, April 1921). The tone of this latter piece is particularly sharp precisely because he placed so much value in the Department of Public Criticism as a tool for the educational improvement of amateur writing. Lovecraft himself certainly felt so during the three terms he was Chairman of the department (1915–16, 1916–17, and 1918–19), and he very likely inculcated his views to the two other chairmen who served between 1915 and 1922 (Rheinhart Kleiner (1917–18) and Alfred Galpin (1919-22)), since both were close friends of his. The fact that both these individuals shared many of Lovecraft’s strict views on the ‘dignity of journalism’ may have caused resentment from those members who did not.
Beginning some time in 1914 Lovecraft made an attempt to practise his educational ideal very close to home, by assisting in the formation of a Providence Amateur Press Club. The impetus for this club came from one Victor L. Basinet, who on the suggestion of Edward H. Cole (a Boston amateur journalist associated with the NAPA) formed an amateur press club amongst some working-class people in the ‘North End’ of Providence who were attending night classes at a local high school. Cole—who was very likely already in touch with Lovecraft—probably urged the group to gain assistance from the UAPA’s only Rhode Island member; and Lovecraft, thinking that this attempt to ‘uplift the masses’ might succeed better than the incident with Arthur Fredlund eight years earlier, gave considerable assistance.
Most of the members were Irish; among them was a particularly feisty young man, about a year and a half older than Lovecraft, named John T. Dunn (1889–1983). The press club set about assembling an amateur journal, the Providence Amateur; the first issue (June 1915) appears to have been written entirely by Lovecraft and Dunn, although only three of the six pieces are signed. The second issue (February 1916) is more substantial, although the typographical accuracy is very poor. This issue contains contributions by a variety of members, including two poems by Lovecraft: ‘To Charlie of the Comics’ (unsigned) and ‘The Bride of the Sea’ (as by ‘Lewis Theobald, Jr.’). In this issue Lovecraft is listed as Official Editor.
Dunn, interviewed by L. Sprague de Camp in 1975, provides some fascinating glimpses of Lovecraft’s personal comportment at the meetings of the club:
Dunn found Lovecraft … odd or even eccentric. At gatherings, Lovecraft sat stiffly staring forward, except when he turned his head towards someone who spoke to him. He spoke in a low monotone.
‘He sat—he usually sat like that, looking straight ahead, see? Then he’d answer a question, and go back again,’ said Father Dunn. ‘I can see him now … and he looked straight ahead; and … he didn’t emphasize things. He nodded sometimes to emphasize a word or an expression.
‘I liked the fellow,’ he continued. ‘I didn’t have anything against him at all, see? Only we did disagree; but I hope we disagreed like gentlemen, see?’
…
Lovecraft’s voice was high-pitched but not what one would call shrill; Dunn said it was about like his own. Lovecraft had great self-control, never losing his temper no matter how heated the argument. ‘He—ah—I never saw him show any temper, see? But when he wrote, he wrote very vigorously; there’s no doubt about that, see …? And he never got excited like I would get excited.’2
Dunn and Lovecraft certainly did have some epistolary fireworks, especially over the Irish question. Dunn later refused to register for the draft and was imprisoned for a time, but was released after the war.
Lovecraft washed his hands of the club shortly after the appearance of the second issue, although he continued to keep in touch with Dunn for another year or so. The club itself had definitely folded by the fall of 1916. So ended Lovecraft’s second attempt to uplift the masses.
I have made reference to the Conservative. This was, of course, Lovecraft’s own amateur journal, and the first periodical he edited since the demise of The Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy in February 1909. Although he was on the editorial board of several other amateur journals, the Conservative was the only one of which he was the sole editor. Thirteen issues appeared from 1915 to 1923, broken down as follows:
Volume I: April 1915, July 1915, October 1915, January 1916 Volume II: April 1916, July 1916, October 1916, January 1917 Volume III: July 1917
Volume IV: July 1918
Volume V: July 1919
No. 12: March 1923
No. 13: July 1923
The issues range from four to twenty-eight pages. The first three issues were written almost entirely by Lovecraft, but thereafter his contributions decline considerably except for occasional poems and—beginning with the October 1916 issue—a regular column of opinion entitled ‘In the Editor’s Study’.
It is clear that Lovecraft welcomed the prospect of editing his own paper rather than merely contributing random pieces to other amateur journals or appearing in the official organ. What this allowed him to do—aside from promoting his own vision of amateurdom as a haven for literary excellence and a tool for humanist education—was to express his own opinions fearlessly. He did just that. The ‘Editorial’ in the July 1915 issue contains his statement of editorial policy:
That the arts of literature and literary criticism will receive prime attention from The Conservative seems very probable. The increasing use among us of slovenly prose and lame metre, supported and sustained by the light reviewers of the amateur press, demands an active opponent, even though a lone one, and the profound reverence of The Conservative for the polished writers of a more correct age, fits him for a task to which his mediocre talent might not otherwise recommend him.
…
Outside the domain of pure literature, The Conservative will ever be found an enthusiastic champion of total abstinence and prohibition; of moderate, healthy militarism as contrasted with dangerous and unpatriotic peace-preaching; of Pan-Saxonism, or the domination by the English and kindred races over the lesser divisions of mankind; and of constitutional representative government, as opposed to the pernicious and contemptible false schemes of anarchy and socialism.
A mighty tall agenda. I have already touched on some of the controversies over literature in which Lovecraft engaged; his political debates—both in published works and in private correspondence—were no less vigorous, and I shall treat them later. We will find that some of Lovecraft’s early opinions are quite repugnant, and many of them are uttered in a cocksure, dogmatic manner greatly in contrast with his later views. Nevertheless, it was evident to all amateurs that the editor of the Conservative was an intellectual force to be dealt with.