It is complex(difficult) to tell, in what has constrained Н. Item Резанов And. Ф. Крузенштерна (but nevertheless instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience and sea intuition, could be constraining).
Naturally, the instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience which is not understanding of importance of special knowledge and seaworthy intuition, could be dangerous. In this sense And. Ф. Крузенштерн struggled for freedom of actions of the commander, for safe and successful navigation.
But to it общепонятным the reasons can add still such reflections.
That would be, if the expedition(dispatch) has come back in structure of two courts and with Н. Item. Резановым onboard one of them?
What name she(it) would receive? Round-the-world expedition(dispatch) Резанова? Резанова Крузенштерна? Резанова Крузенштерна Лисянского?
Гиперболизируя and dreaming, it is possible to tell, that on кону there was a place in a history.
So, the game went for important things:
(1) For safety of navigation,
(2) For успешность of navigation (not of ambassadorial mission and not компанейской - economic - mission), namely for success of round-the-world navigation and scientifically познавательной of mission.
(3) For a place in a history.
The sphynx is mysterious усмехнулся: ' Play! Your figures are your successes. Win! '
Energy соревновательности and creation of success
Certainly, полицентричность creates a specific psychological situation.
To retell in the given sketch the information, which is stated in sources concerning mutual relation And. Ф. Крузенштерна and Н. Item. Резанова, it is not expedient.
Let's note only culmination moments.
It is curious, that by one of the culminations the conflict has reached(achieved) after an output(exit) in Silent ocean, passage of a significant distance at Silent ocean, but before arrival on Kamchatka (and in Japan), and prior to the beginning separate плаваний "of 'Hope" (to Japan and Kamchatka) and "'Neva" (to Alaska).
To this moment ("'Hope" and "'Neva" were in area of the Hawaiian islands) steel (1) qualifications of the captains, (2) real prospects of success of round-the-world navigation are clear.
As to the ambassador Н. Item. Резанова, it(he) was still ' a thing in itself(himself) ', on any achievement or successes it(he) still refer could not.
И. Ф. Крузенштерн used stated Н. Item. Резановым in relation to it(him) (Крузенштерну) a word "'ребячитесь" for organization of collective trial (with participation Лисянского and representatives of officer structure "of 'Hope" and "'Neva").
' - the Economic businesses at all not your competence, приказчики exchange компанейские subjects. - Резанов slightly усмехнулся. - Is thought, it for you is not solid and is complete to you ребячиться.
Крузенштерн оторопело has stared on Резанова, the person it(him) became crimson, and it(he) has screamed:
- How you смеете how you смеете how you ребячусь?! ' [Фирсов And. И.].
From sources follows, that Ю. Ф. Лисянский has supported And. Ф. Крузенштерна.
И. Ф. Крузенштерн aggravates a situation up to a limit at the moment of collective trial of a word "'ребячитесь". In the conflict is involved Ю. Ф. Лисянский. Резанов shows the document signed personally by the emperor Александром I. Ю. Ф. Лисянский in запале makes inappropriate words: that the emperor did not write it, but only has signed.
' Is who wrote? - has asked Лисянский, looking on Резанова in an emphasis.
(...)
- Yes who wrote that? - has repeated Лисянский.
(...)
- That that also is! - has told Лисянский ironically. - we want to know, who wrote, and to sign ... it(he) all will sign. It is known to us ... ' [Штейнберг Е. Л.].
Like, Н. Item. Резанов - having received such opportunity - officially has informed(notified) of St. Petersburg on words Ю. Ф. Лисянского.
Formally Н. Item. Резанов of the rights, declaring about the powers, this correctness recognize all. But there is a psychological inertia: the officers possess experience of a sea service, and by the ship it is accepted единоначалие, the captain solely supervises over the ship.
Н. Item. Резанов or there is no right to displace the captain (such prospect arises only after arrival "of 'Hope" on Kamchatka), or there is no on it a determination, or simply is not able it to make (it(he) the man not naval). The officer structure is picked up personally Крузенштерном, some members of crew are it(him) (Крузенштерна) the relatives. Крузенштерн fairly announces to officer structure, that it(he) - commander of the ship, and that it(he) takes the responsibility for the conflict with Н. Item. Резановым on itself. The imperial document on powers Резанова is announced, it(he) (imperial document) is formally recognized, but in a rule(situation) Н. Item. Резанова it a little that changes, it(he) continues navigation in isolation.
The psychological pressure has appeared so strong, that the further way (up to Kamchatka) Н. Item. Резанов has done, самоизолировавшись, in the cabin.
' The Explanation was held, but simplification it has not brought. Резанов did not leave the cabin up to itself Петропавловска ' [Фирсов And. И.].
Nevertheless, after that conflict occur not so appreciable, but extremely important changes in a rule(situation) and in moods And. Ф. Крузенштерна and Ю. Ф. Лисянского.
Е. Л. Штейнберг is art - but is extreme realistic - домысливает of a word Крузенштерна and Лисянского:
' All this I take on myself, - has told Крузенштерн ... - ... пройдя third of way, owe we it(him) with glory finish ... whatever happened and on what victims it would be not necessary to go!
Лисянский has come back to "'Neva" in gloomy mood. (...)
- Yes! The officer has told aloud. - Крузенштерн of the rights: the travel needs to be finished with glory ... that happened! ' [Штейнберг Е. Л.].
Even in morning Ю. Ф. Лисянский was the person rather who has been not involved in the conflict Крузенштерна with Резановым. But, having stated careless words about the emperor in an exciting atmosphere of collective trial organized And. Ф. Крузенштерном, it(he) (Лисянский) should strain all forces for some kind of rehabilitations, ' on what victims it would be not necessary to go ', ' whatever happened '. The started mechanism троецентрия has worked: at Ю. Ф. Лисянского did not remain of other output(exit) except for obvious, distinct(clear) and indisputable success.