Of course, it might refer to the patricians acceding to the sentence of exile.
Yet all is not well with Coriolanus, either. He is still Coriolanus and can no more bend to the Volscians, now that he is leading them, than he could ever bend to the Romans. The Volscian officers are uneasy and even Tullus Aufidius is unhappy, saying:
—Act IV, scene vii, lines 8-11
And yet he must be used, for he is conquering Rome without even having to fight. Aufidius says:
—Act IV, scene vii, lines 28-30
Apparently, even though the patricians of Rome have agreed to resist, there remain some who cling more tightly to party than to country. And even those who are intending to resist can do so with only half a heart.
And yet can the patricians honestly think that the Volscians are willing to serve as nothing more than a bunch of errand boys for them, to help them back to power out of love and kindness? The outside power, brought in to help in an internal fight, stays (all history shows) to help itself at the expense of all. And Aufidius says, at the end of the scene, apostrophizing the absent Coriolanus (to whom he refers by the familiar first name as though the man is someone he can now consider a tool or servant):
—Act IV, scene vii, lines 56-57
The patricians who decide to resist Coriolanus may be moved by abstract love of country, but they may also be moved by a realization of the danger of accepting foreign help under any circumstances. This is something the Greeks never learned (and few nations since).
Soon Rome knows the worst. It is Coriolanus' vengeful desire to burn it to the ground. Surrender will not satisfy him; only destruction will. (This is purely psychotic unless the patricians had specifically deserted Coriolanus in the scene I postulate to be missing.)
Cominius, the ex-consul, and Coriolanus' old general, had gone to plead and had been met coldly. Cominius had reminded Coriolanus of his friends in the city and reports that:
—Act V, scene i, lines 24-28
Even at best, with all possible motive, Coriolanus seems to have skirted the edge of madness here, for as Menenius points out:
—Act V, scene i, lines 28-29
There seems little hope for penetrating the red veil of madness that has closed over Coriolanus' vengeful mind. Cominius says:
—Act V, scene i, lines 70-74
—Act V, scene ii, lines 83-84
Has Coriolanus the strength to turn against his own mother? Perhaps, but only because he has a substitute. He remains the little boy who must have parental approval. Having brutally turned away Menenius, he turns to Aufidius and seeks approval with what might almost be a simper:
—Act V, scene ii, lines 93-94
Aufidius knows his man. Gravely, he gives him what he wants and tells him he is a good boy:
—Act V, scene ii, line 95
But now the women come: his wife, his mother, the fair Valeria. His young son is also there.
Coriolanus kneels to his mother, but holds firm, saying:
—Act V, scene iii, lines 81-86
He is determined to place his own grievances above Rome and wishes to cancel his mother's arguments even before she makes them.
But now Volumnia, in a speech of noble eloquence, shows that she places Rome before him and herself. Too late she tries to teach him that life is not a matter of blows and rages alone; that there are softer and nobler virtues:
—Act V, scene iii, lines 154-55
And when Coriolanus remains obdurate, she rises to return to Rome to die and then uses the one remaining weapon at her disposal, and the most terrible of alclass="underline"
—Act V, scene iii, lines 177-82
With a terrible understatement, she makes it clear that when the city is burning, she will call down a dying mother's curse upon her son.
And before this Coriolanus cannot stand. He collapses utterly and cries out:
—Act V, scene iii, lines 185-89
He turns away; he will not fight further against Rome; and he asks Au-fidius to make peace. Aufidius is willing to do so. With Coriolanus not in the fight, Rome will be difficult to take. It would be better to make the peace, use the results against Coriolanus, and perhaps fight Rome another time when Coriolanus is not present either to help or to hinder. So much we can assume. Aufidius actually says, in an aside, that he is glad at this development since it will help
In Rome Menenius is gloomy. He tells an anxious Sicinius that he doesn't think Volumnia will prevail; after all, he himself did not. He describes Coriolanus in the most forbidding terms as nothing but a war machine:
—Act V, scene iv, lines 22-23
He is, in other words, as immobile, as aloof, as untouched by humanity as a statue of Alexander the Great. This is an anachronism, for Alexander lived nearly a century and a half after Coriolanus and died in 323 b.c.