Выбрать главу

Economica, 37, 257—276.

1976. Anomaly and the development of economics: the case of the Leontief paradox.

In Latsis, 1976, 109–127.

1988. Popper and the LSE economists. In The Popperian Legacy in Economics.

N. de Marchi (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139—166.

— 1991. Introduction: rethinking Lakatos. In de Marchi and Blaug, 1991, 1—30.

de Marchi N. and Blaug M. (eds.), 1991. Appraising Economic Theories. Aldershot,

Hants: Edward Elgar. Denison E. F., 1974. Accounting for U.S. Growth, 1929–1969. Washington: The Brookings

Institution. Desai M., 1981. Testing Monetarism. London: Frances Pinter.

De Vroey M., 1990. The base camp paradox: a reflection on the place of tatonnement

in general equilibrium theory. Economics and Philosophy, 6 (2), 235—254. DiesingP., 1971. Patterns of Discoveries in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.

— 1985. Hypothesis testing and data interpretation: the case of Milton Friedman.

In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 3. W. J. Samuels (ed.).

Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.

Dolan E. G. (ed.), 1976. The Foundation of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City:

Sheed &Ward. Dray W., 1957. Laws and Explanations in History. London: Oxford University Press.

1966. Philosophical Analysis and History. New York: Harper & Row.

Dror Y., 1968. Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler.

1971. Ventures in Policy Science. New York: American Elsevier.

Eatwell J., Milgate M. and Newman P. (eds.), 1987. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary

of Economics. London: Macmillan, 4 vols.

EichnerA. S. (ed.), 1983. Why Economics Is Not yet a Science. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Elster J., 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University

Press.

Eltis W. A., 1973. Growth and Distribution. London: Macmillan. Eysenck H. J., 1979. Astrology. Science — or superstition? Encounter, 53, 85—90. Fair R. C, 1978. A theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of Political Economy, 86,

45–62. Fearon, P., 1979. The Origin and Nature of the Great Slump, 1929—1932. London:

Macmillan Education. Feiwel G. R. (ed.), 1987. Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. London:

Macmillan. Ferber M. A. and Birnbaum B. G., 1977. The «new home economics»: retrospects and

prospects. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 19—28. Ferguson С. Е., 1969. The Neo–Classical Theory of Production and Distribution.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ferguson С. Е. and Allen R. F., 1970. Factor prices, commodity prices and switches

of technique. Western Economic Journal, 8, 95—109. Feyerabend P. K., 1975. Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.

London: NLB. (Рус. пер.: Против метода. Очерк анархистской теории познания. //Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки. М., 1986, с. 125—467.)

1976. On the critique of scientific reason. In Method and Appraisal in the Physical

Sciences. C. Howson (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309—339.

1978. Science in a Free Society. London: NLB. (Сокр. рус. пер.: Наука в свободном обществе. //Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки, с. 467—523.)

1988. Farewell to Reason. New York: Routledge.

Finger J. M., 1971. Is equilibrium an operational concept? Economic Journal, 81,

609–612. Fischer F. M., 1987. Adjustment processes and stability. In Eatwell et al., 1987, 1,

26–29.

Fisher S., 1991. Recent developments in macroeconomics. In Oswald, 1991, vol. 1, 1—47. Flew A., 1984. Darwinian Evolution. London: Paladin Books. Franklin R. J. and Resnik S., 1973. The Political Economy of Racism. New York: Holt,

Rinehart & Winston. FraserL. M., 1937. Economic Thought and Language. A Critique of Some Fundamental

Concepts. London: A. & С Black.

Frey В. S. and Eichenberger R., 1989. Should social scientists care about choice anomalies? Rationality and Society, 1 (1), 101—122.

Frey B. S., Pommerehne W. W., Schneider F. and Gilbert G., 1984. Consensus and Dissension Among Economists: An Empirical Enquiry. American Economic Review, 7 (5), 986–994.

Friedman D., 1988. Economics in Theory and Practice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Friedman M., 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Рус. пер.: Фридмен М. Методология позитивной экономической науки. // THESIS, 1994, вып. 4, с. 20–52.)

1956. The quantity theory of money: a restatement. In Studies in the Quantity

Theory of Money. M. Friedman (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3—21.

(Рус. пер.: Фридмен М. Количественная теория денег: новая формулировка. //

Количественная теория денег. М.: Эльф пресс, 1996.)

1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

1968. Money: Quantity Theory. In Sills, 1968, vol. 10, 433—447.

1970. A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy,

78, 193–238.

1987. The quantity theory of money. In Eatwell et al., 4, 3—20.

Friedman M. and Schwartz A. J., 1991. Alternative approaches to analyzing economic

data. American Economic Review, 81 (1), 39—49. Fulop M., 1977. A survey of the literature on the economic theory of fertility behavior.

American Economist, 21, 5—13. Geanakoplos J., 1987. Arrow—Debreu model of general equilibrium. In Eatwell et al.,

1987, 1, 116–124.

George W., 1982. Darwin. Fontana Modern Masters. London: Fontana Paperbacks. Gerrard В., 1990. On matters methodological in economics. Journal of Economic

Surveys, 4 (2), 197–223. Ghiselin M. Т., 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of

California Press. Gilbert C.L., 1991. Do economists test theories? — demand analysis and consumption

analysis as tests of theories of economic method. In de Marchi and Blaug, 1991,

143–154. Glass J. С and Johnson W., 1989. Economics. Progression, Stagnation or Degeneration?

New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Goldsmith D. (ed.), 1977. Scientists Confront Velikovsky. Ithaca: Cornell University

Press. Gomes L., 1990. Neoclassical International Economics. An Historical Survey. London: