Duality applies to laws as well. There are the Laws of the Universe which are immutable (provided that we did not make a mistake in our conclusions about how a particular thing works in the Universe), but there are also laws that were artificially created by people. Artificial laws should not violate the Laws of the Universe, otherwise suffering will follow the mistake. The word “rule” is more appropriate than “law”, since people decide for themselves how to live.
I would single out 3 groups that dictate the behavior of society:
The Laws of the Universe. We know about them from science and from the proof of the existence of certain things. Following the Laws of the Universe, we will make few mistakes and, as a result, we will suffer little;
Rules invented by people. Traffic rules, grammatical rules in the language, rules of self-organization of society, etc. – what should exist so that there is no chaos;
And recommendations. For example, wearing a mask and gloves during a coronavirus would be recommendations – naturally, people would be taught that the virus is not only real, but also dangerous; do not expose yourself and others to possible suffering. It is worth understanding and remembering that each person suffers only for his own mistakes. Even before the restrictions on freedom of movement, I thought about taking less walks during the virus, as I understood that if I got sick, I could die and I would not finish my book, which I consider quite important for people (you decide if this is so or not), and therefore I did not need restrictions and directions on how to live my life.
But the aforementioned voting still takes a lot of time, as it distracts people from their responsibilities (work) to society. Moreover, there are times, such as war, when a democratic voting will cause the death of the entire nation. Therefore, it is logical that you need to have one leader. It is also logical that this leader should make those decisions that will benefit the people. This leader must be honest, wise, and intelligent, and he must not be a member of any political party. Here knowledge about spirituality will help us. People who have accumulated spiritual knowledge in their Astral body during their previous lives will not do bad things towards anyone in their life, starting from childhood. Such people will be able to be sincerely committed to striving to do their best for their nation.
How do we find such people? Thao advised Michel that people follow the example of the continent of Mu, whose people were the most organized on Earth in its entire history.
People in each village (as well as dachas and other rural settlements) and urban areas will elect a person who will meet all of the above parameters. No one with a record of bad conduct or a tendency towards fanaticism during their current life could be chosen. Such people are chosen for their honesty and purity, not for the promises they made but could not keep.
Thus, I might not have been selected because of my two childhood episodes, when I laughed at a girl with my friend, and when I decided to roll around in the snow the guy who was younger than me. My other life decisions should also serve as a block, but you would not have known about them if I had not personally and honestly told about them. I mention this so that you understand that the choice of the leader of the village and the district should be approached very, very seriously, and there is no need to be afraid of anyone or anything if you know that someone has done something wrong during their life – otherwise there is a chance that because of your silence the whole country will suffer, and you too will have to suffer for your mistake.
Also, a person cannot appoint himself as a candidate. If someone says that he wants to be the candidate from the village/district, then this is a clear sign that the person is hungry for attention and power. Such a person cannot be chosen as a representative.
If it so happens that there is no person who meets all the necessary parameters in a village or district, then they do not choose anyone.
Further, these selected people will be sent to the nearest city, where further elections will be held.
These midterm elections are held in the same way as the final ones, which I will discuss in the next paragraph:
All elected representatives from all over the country will meet in the capital. There they will be divided into groups of six people each. Each group will have their own conference room, and they will spend 10 days together – talking, eating together, and the like. Eventually they will choose the leader of the group.
If 60 representatives came to the capital, and they were divided into ten groups, then there would be 10 group leaders. Of these ten, 7 would be chosen in the same way, and then they would choose the Supreme Leader.
We can initially determine the number of representatives who will come to the capital for the final elections by dividing the country into virtual zones. For example, in order for 60 selected representatives to come to the capital, we need to virtually divide the country into 60 zones; then we divide each of those zones into further zones, and this process goes on until we have several dozen villages and city districts in one mini-zone.
What about cities where population density is currently very high? In my apartment building, for example, there are about 500 apartments, and about 1000 people living in the house – which is the approximate number for the villages’ population. In other houses there are fewer people. It might be possible to combine several houses into one zone for the election of a representative if the total number of residents does not exceed 1000 people. Otherwise, a representative is chosen in a single apartment building.
Thus, the chances are that the 7 leaders will most likely not know each other and will not be in cahoots.
It is worth noting that in Mu, a leader was only elected in this way if the previous Supreme Leader died without appointing a successor, or the successor was not unanimously approved by the Council of Seven. I would leave it to the people to decide by voting if they want the Supreme Leader to be able to appoint a successor or not.
If the Supreme Leader shows the slightest tendency to dictatorship, then the peer council of six must overthrow him. If for some reason this does not happen, then people initiate a voting to overthrow the entire council of seven and then initiate new elections using the Mu method.
The Supreme Leader's vote is worth two votes. If four are against him, and two are with him on a specific issue, then they will be at a deadlock. They will spend hours or days debating until one in seven changes their mind. This discussion is held in the context of intelligence, love and concern for the people.
These people do not receive any material benefits for leading the country. This is their vocation, and they do it out of love to serve their nation. This way we avoid the problem of hiding opportunists among the leaders.
Since the Supreme Leader is a spiritual person who really helps people and works for them, there is no fear that he will rule the country together with his six assistants for the rest of his life; there is no need to replace leaders every few years, as is now the case in many countries on Earth. Six assistants, whom the leader did not know before the election, and who are also spiritual people, will overturn him in the event of the slightest signs of dictatorship from the Supreme Leader. And if it suddenly turns out that the majority, or all 7, will take the path of dictatorship (but the chances of this are very, very small, since they are all spiritual people), then people will be able to initiate a vote (referendum) on a complete change of government, and they will choose a new one. At the same time, having worked out their mistakes – namely, in the fact that you need to responsibly choose a person at the first stage of the election, as well as at all other stages.