Hennig, D. 'T. Labienus und der erste Maiestatsprozess defamosis libellis', Chiron 3 (1973) 245-54
Honore, A. M. 'Proculus', RHD 30 (1962) 472-509
Honore, A. M. Emperors and Lawyers. London, 1981
Horak, F. Rationes Decidendi: Entscheidungbegrŭndungen bei den alteren romischen Juristen bis Labeo 1. Innsbruck, 1969
Johnston, D. The Roman Law of Trusts. Oxford, 1988
Jolowicz, H. F. and Nicholas, B. Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. 3rd edn. Cambridge, 1972
Kaser, M. Das romische Zivilpro%essrecht. Munich, 1966
Kaser, M. Das romische Privatrecht. 2nd edn. Vol. 1 Munich, 1971; Vol. n Munich, 1975
Kaser, M. '"Ius Honorarium" und "Ius Civile"', ZRG 101 (1984) 1-114
Koschaker, P. Europa und das romische Recht. 4th edn. Munich, 1966
Krampe, C. Proculi Epistulae: eine Frŭhklassische ĵuristenschrift. Karlsruhe, 1970
Kunkel, W. 'Das Wesen des ius respondendf, ZRG 66 (1948) 423-57 666a. Kunkel, W. Herkunft und So^iale Stellung der romischen Juristen. 2nd edn.
Graz-Vienna—Cologne, 1967
Kunkel, W. An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History (transl. by J. M. Kelly) 2nd edn. Oxford, 1973
Liebs, D. 'Rechtsschulen und Rechtsunterricht im Principat', ANRW II, 15 (1976) 197-286
Litewski, W. 'Die romische Appellation in Zivilsachen', ANRW 11, 14 (1982) 60-96
Martini, R. Le definii{ioni deigiuristi romani. Milan, 1966
Mayer-Maly, T. 'Proculus', RE s.v. (1957) 1234-40
Norr, D. 'Pomponius: oder "Zum Geschichtsverstandnis der romischen Juristen'", ANRW II, 15 (1976) 497-604
Norr, D. 'Planung in der Andke: Ober die Ehegesetze des Augustus', in Baier, H. (ed.) Freiheit undSach^wang: Beitrage \u Ehren H. Schelskys, 309— 34. Opladen, 1977
Norr, D. 'I giuristi romani: tradizionalismo о progresso?', BIDR 84 (1981) 9-33
Norr, D. 'C. Cassius Longinus: der Jurist als Rhetor (Bemerkungen zu Tacitus, Ann. i4.42ff.)', in Heine, H. (ed.) Althistorische Studien H. Bengtson, 187-222. Wiesbaden, 1983
Norr, D. 'Zur Biographie des Juristen C. Cassius Longinus', in Sodalitas:
Scritti in Onore di A. Guarino vi, 2957-78. Naples, 1984
Orestano, R. II potere normative degli imperatori e le costitu%ioni imperiali. Rome, 1937; repr. Turin, 1962
Pernice, A. Labeo: Romisches Privatrecbt im Ersten Jahrhundert der Kaiser^eit 3 vols. Halle, 1873—1900
Provera, G. 'Ancora sul "ius respondendi"', SDHI 28 (1962) 342—60
Pugliese, G. IIProcesso Civile Romano и: IIprocessoformulare 1. Milan, 1963
Riccobono, S. 'La giurisprudenza dell'impero', in с 12A, 147-59
Rogers, R. S.' Ateius Capito and Tiberius', in Synteleia V. Arangio-Rui£ 1, 123—7. Naples, 1964
Rohle, R. 'Praetor Fideicommissarius', RID A 15 (1968) 399-428
Roman Statutes. London, 1995
Rotondi.G. jLegespublicaepopuliromani. Milan, 1912; repr. with appendix, 1962
Ruggiero, E. de Im patria net dirittopubblico romano. Rome, 1921
Sargenti, M. 'Considerazioni sul potere normativo imperiale', in Sodalitas: Scritti in Onore di A. Guarino vi, 2625—51 • Naples, 1984
Scacchetti, M. G. 'Note sulle differenze di metodo fra Sabiniani e Proculiani', in Studi in Onore di A. Biscardi v, 369-404. Milan, 1984
Schiller, A. A. Roman Law: Mechanisms of Development. The Hague-Paris- New York, 1978
Schulz, F. History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford, 1946
Seidl, E. 'Labeos geistiges Profil', in Studi in Onore di E. Volterra 1,63-81. Milan, 1971
Sherwin-White, A. N. 'Poena legis repetundarum', PBSR 17 (1949) 5-25
Siber, H. 'Plautius', RE s.v. (1951) 45-51
Stein, P. 'The relations between grammar and law in the early principate: the beginning of analogy', La Critica del Testo 11, 757—69. Florence, 1971
Stein, P. 'The two schools of jurists in the early principate', Cambridge Law Journal 31 (1972) 8—31
Sturm, F. 'Pegaso: un giureconsulto dell'epoca di Vespasiano', Atti del Congresso Internationale di Studi Vespasianei, 105—36. Rieti, 1981
Syme, R. 'Fiction about Roman jurists', ZRG 99 (1980) 78-104 ( = a 94, in, 1393-1414)
Thomas, J. A. C. 'Lex Iulia de adulteriis coercendis', Etudes J. Macqueron, 637—44. Aix-en-Provence, 1970
Volkmann, H. Zur Rechtsprechung im Primjpat des Augustus (Historische Beitrage). Munich, 1935
Watson, A. The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford, 1967
Watson, A. Rome of the XII Tables. Princeton, 1975
Watson, A. 'Roman slave law and Romanist ideology', Phoenix 37 (1983) 53—65
Watson, A. Roman Slave Law. Baltimore, 1987
Wieacker, F. Vom romischen Recht. 2nd edn. Stuttgart, 1961
Wieacker, F. 'Augustus und die Juristen seiner Zeit', RHD 37 (1969) 33i—49
Wieacker, F. 'Respondere ex auctoritate principis', in J. A. Ankum et al. (eds.) Satura Roberto Feenstra oblata, 71—94. Fribourg, 1985
30 Plut. Pomp. 76.4; in general, cf. Timpe 1962 (c 256) 114-16.
40 MRR и 308. 41 Above, p. 10 and n. 19.
42 Plancus in Cic. Fam. x.8.3 and 6, with n. in D. R. Shackleton Bailey's commentary.
45 Dio XLVHI.25.2 implies that the garrisons were composed of old partisans of Brutus and Cassius, though this is scarcely credible in so sensitive an area: cf. Brunt 1971 (a 9) 497.
Strab. xvi.2.24-5 (660Q; cf. Brunt 1971 (a 9) 497.
So on coins, EJ2 8, RRC 524: cf. Strab. xiv.2.24-5 (660Q; Plut. Ant. 28.1; Dio xLVin.26.5. Plutarch and Strabo both take Partbieus imperator together, 'commander of the Parthians'; Dio more plausibly takes Partbieus as an assumed cognomen, implying that Labienus had himself acclaimed imperator by his troops and also took the cognomen Partbieus. Cf. Crawford 1974 (в 319) 529; Wallmann 1989 (c 243) 232-4.
« Dio XLvm.26.3-4; Strab. xiv.2.24—$ (660С); Tac. Ann. 111.62.2; RDCE 27 (Stratoniceia) and 59-60 (Mylasa); Reynolds 1982 (в 270) docs, it, 12, and probably 7 and 13 (Aphrodisias).