They held their breaths, eyes fixed on the card in his hands. The Inspector nodded to himself and uttered a noiseless sigh.
His left hand holding steady, Ellery made a quick movement of his right hand, ripping off half the card. This, remaining in his right hand, he immediately crumpled and threw away. Then he held up his left hand; in it was the other half of the card.
“You will please observe,” he said, “what has happened. I wanted to tear this card in two. How did I accomplish this simple and yet marvelous digital feat? By exerting force with my right hand, by crumbling with my right hand, by throwing away the unwanted piece with my right hand. This left my right hand empty, and my left hand occupied. Occupied,” he said sharply, “with the piece I had gone through the whole process for. My left hand, which did no work whatever except to counterbalance the exertions of my right, becomes the repository of the uncrumpled half.”
He swept their dazed faces with a stern glance. There was no levity in his demeanor now.
“What is the significance of all this? Simply that I am a dextrous individual; that is, upon my right hand I throw the burden of all manual work. I use my right hand to do manual work instinctively. It is one of the integral characteristics of my physical makeup. I can never achieve left-handed gesture or motion without a distinct effort of will... Well, the point is that Dr. Xavier was right-handed, too, you see.”
And then realization flooded into their faces.
“I see you grasp my meaning,” continued Ellery grimly. “We found the uncrumpled half of the six of spades in Dr. Xavier’s right hand. But I have just demonstrated that a right-handed individual in going through the process of tearing, crumpling, throwing away one half and retaining the other half will retain the other half in his left hand, Since both halves of a playing card are substantially identical it is not a question of mentally preferring one half to the other. Consequently the half retained will always be retained, as I say, in the hand that didn’t do the work. Consequently, we found the retained half of playing card in Dr. Xavier’s wrong hand. Consequently, Dr. Xavier did not tear that card. Consequently, someone else did tear that card and placed it in Dr. Xavier’s hand, making the pardonable mistake of concluding without complete consideration that since Dr. Xavier was right-handed the card should be found in his right hand. Consequently,” and he paused and a look of pity crossed his face, “we all owe Mrs. Xavier the profoundest apology for putting her in excruciating mental distress, for accusing her wrongly of having committed murder!”
Mrs. Xavier’s mouth was open; she blinked like a woman coming out of darkness into dazzling sunlight.
“For, you see,” went on Ellery quietly, “if someone else placed the uncrumpled half of the six of spades in the dead man’s hand, then someone else — not the dead man — was accusing Mrs. Xavier of having murdered her husband. But if the dead man was not the accuser, the whole case collapses. Instead of a guilty woman, we have a wronged woman, a framed woman! Instead of a murderess, we have an innocent victim of the well-known frame-up. And who could the framer be except the real murderer? Who would have motive to throw suspicion of murder upon an innocent person except the murderer himself?” He stooped and picked up the crumpled half of card. Then he put both pieces into his pocket. “The case,” he said slowly, “far from being solved, has just begun.”
There was a cutting silence for some time, and the most silent of all was Mrs. Xavier. She sank back upon the pillow, hiding her face in her hands. The others began quickly and surreptitiously to examine each other’s faces. Mrs. Wheary groaned and leaned weakly against the jamb. Bones glared from Mrs. Xavier to Ellery, utterly stupefied.
“But... but,” stammered Miss Forrest, staring at the woman in bed, “why did she... why—?”
“A very pertinent question, Miss Forrest,” murmured Ellery. “That was the second of the two problems I had to solve. Once I had solved the first and concluded that Mrs. Xavier was innocent, the question naturally arose: If she was innocent, why had she confessed to the crime? But that,” he paused, “becomes self-evident with a little thought. Mrs. Xavier,” he said softly, “why did you confess to a crime of which you are innocent?”
The woman began to sob with hacking heaves of her breast. The Inspector turned and went to the window to stare out. Life seemed very dismal at the moment.
“Mrs. Xavier!” murmured Ellery. He leaned over the bed and touched her hands. They fell away from her face and she stared up at him with streaming eyes. “You are a very great woman, you know; but we really can’t permit you to make the sacrifice. Whom are you shielding?”
Part III
“It is as if you batter away at a stubborn door with all your strength and after exhaustive effort break it down. For a moment the light blinds you and you think you are seeing reality. Then your eyes become inured and you see that the details had been wispiest illusion, that it is merely an empty compartment with another stubborn door on the opposite side... I daresay that every investigator of crime has experienced this same feeling on a case which has more than the average subtlety.”
— From Rambles in the Past (p. 233)
by RICHARD QUEEN
Chapter XI
The Graveyard
The change which came over the face of Mrs. Xavier was remarkable. It was as if her features, one by one, were turning to stone. Her skin hardened first, and then her mouth and chin; the skin smoothed and flattened like poured concrete and the whole woman filled out like a mold. In a twinkling, with the alchemy of instant readjustment peculiar to her she regained the agelessness of her youth.
She even smiled, the old half-smile of the Gioconda. But she did not reply to Ellery’s head-cocked question.
The Inspector turned slowly to survey the faces of the customary puppets. They were always puppets, he reflected — damned wooden-faced ones, when they wanted to keep something back. And they all wanted to keep something back in a murder investigation. There was nothing to be learned from all those guilty countenances. But guilt, he knew from the bitter wisdom of experience, was only a comparative quality of the human animal. It was the heart, not the face, which told the guilty tale. He sighed and almost wished for the lie-detecting apparatus of his friend the Columbia University professor. In one case notably...
Ellery straightened and removed his pince-nez. “So we are to meet with silence on the single item of importance, eh?” he said thoughtfully. “I suppose you realize, Mrs. Xavier, that by refusing to speak you’re making yourself an accessory after the fact?”
“I do not know what you are talking about,” she said in a low impassioned voice.
“Indeed? At least you comprehend the obscure fact that you’re no longer held for murder?”
She was silent.
“You won’t talk, Mrs. Xavier?”
“I have nothing to say.”
“El.” The Inspector moved his head shortly and Ellery, with a shrug, retreated. The old gentleman stepped forward and eyed Mrs. Xavier with an odd antagonism. After all, she had been his catch. “Mrs. Xavier, the world is full of funny people, and they do all sorts of cussed things and generally it’s hard to tell why they do ’em. Human beings are inconsistent. But a copper can tell you why some people do certain things, and standing the gaff for somebody else’s capital crime is one of them. Shall I tell you why you were willing to accept the blame for a murder you didn’t commit?”