“Ah, but you can never trust what Patricia tells you.”
Kimberley offers a game but strained smile. “Pat, I want to go on. Now. I don’t want to wait. I’m ready. I’m not ready, but I want to get what’s left of my life under way.” She turns to me. “He did it, Mr. Beauchamp. He’s guilty.”
Patricia tries to warn her. “Kimberley — ”
But Kimberley won’t be hushed. “I’m sorry he did it. I’m almost as sorry as he is. If he could undo the past, I’m sure he would, but we all have to live with what we’ve done and who we are.”
“Aptly put, Miss Martin. Past life is a script that cannot be altered.”
From the periphery of my vision I see Jonathan watching us, curious.
“Now, Pat. I’m okay. I can do it.”
Is she playing the gallant trouper for my benefit? How difficult it is to read this young woman.
“I call Kimberley Martin.”
Kimberley walks gracefully up the aisle, her head high. On the stand she takes a deep breath, her chest filling out. She smiles at Wally — his eyes fixed on those swelling breasts — as she accepts his invitation to sit. Wally smiles back, showing teeth, flirting.
As she responds to the opening questions, her voice assumes a firmness. She is led through her personal history: where and when born, parents, sibling, schooling, her plans to finish law school, and to wed. Her evidence as to her early dealings with Jonathan varies little from that at the preliminary, but is less emphatic, offers less punch. Often her responses are long and rambling, but just as often curt. Many glances Jonathan’s way: usually hostile, but sometimes curious. Occasionally she fails to follow a question, and it must be repeated for her. For all her determination, she is not the feisty young woman who testified at the preliminary inquiry.
But this works for the jury; she has already engaged their sympathies. In fact, I suspect they find her far too likeable. Wally, of course, interjects often and gallantly, spreading his cloak to help the witness cross the puddles, coquetting boldly with this maiden in distress.
Yet Kimberley’s evidence is so far none too compelling. Patricia would obviously like to portray Jonathan as a lusting beast circling his prey on campus lawn and in cafeteria, but the picture lacks resolution.
“How often did you and he, ah, bump into each other?”
“It seemed like two, three times a week.”
“Did you feel he was stalking you?”
I am on my feet. “That is about the most blatant leading question I have ever had the privilege to hear in a court of law.”
But Wally is solicitous. “Try to put it another way, Ms. Blueman.” Why is he not rapping her knuckles for this? But he is miffed with me, and is taking out his revenge.
“How would you describe the accused’s relationship with you?”
“I thought he was giving me a lot of extra attention. In class and out. It didn’t bother me.”
This line of questioning seems in danger of fizzing out, but Patricia is relentless. “Did you at any time inform Professor O’Donnell that you were engaged to be married?”
“Yes.”
“Did that seem to discourage him?”
Again I rise. “I object to this clearly loaded question.”
“I think you’re being far too fussy, Mr. Beauchamp,” Wally says. “The witness may answer.”
Kimberley is emboldened. “He kept coming on.”
“You were chair of the social committee that organized the dance?”
“That’s right.”
“And did you invite any of the faculty?”
“Yes. I personally sold Professor O’Donnell a ticket.”
“Why?”
“He was on my list.”
“And his response?”
“He said he’d be delighted.”
“Around this time what were your feelings about him?”
The witness takes some time answering. She bites her lip.
“I liked him. He was a very good teacher, and that’s how I thought of him. Mostly”
While that odd little adverb “mostly” hangs in the air, she locks eyes again with Jonathan: briefly, intensely. Patricia studies the wall clock.
“Good time to break, Ms. Blueman?” Wally asks. “Almost four-thirty.”
“M’lord,” I say, “can we not carry on until five? I’m sure Miss Martin would like to get a full day in.”
“Are you comfortable with that, Ms. Martin?” purrs solicitous Wally. “Do you think you can cope? It’s up to you.”
“Yes,” says Kimberley, “I’d like to get this. . ordeal over with.”
“I quite understand,” says Wally.
Augustina leans to me. “I think I’m going to ralph up.”
Patricia takes the witness to the Odd Fellows Hall in the Fairview area — Kimberley arrived early to help set up for the dance. She had “a beer or two” with her helpmates and, later when the affair got under way, a rye and 7Up.
“And did the accused show up at this dance?”
“Yes, I would say about nine-thirty. And he came over to where I was, and I asked him if he’d like to dance, and we did that.”
This is a more muted version from that on her tapes, in which she said Jonathan made a beeline for her.
“And then he bought me a drink. It seemed a little more powerful than the one I’d had before. It may have been a double. We talked for a while. He asked where Remy was. And I remember we talked about his background, about the British aristocracy — his father’s a nobleman of some kind, a viscount, I think. But he came to Canada when he was nine, educated mostly here, except for Oxford. . well, anyway, that’s what we talked about.”
She staggers to a halt. I suspect she has been coached not to run on like this, to keep her answers short and pertinent. A hint of a sardonic smile plays on the lips of forewoman Jackson-Blyth, who keeps staring at Jonathan — does she see him as some inflated right-wing aristocrat, boasting of his heritage in an effort to corrupt this trusting student?
Kimberley restarts her engine. “I saw him make several visits to the bar, and then he came up to me and asked if he could have the last dance. I could see he was a little impaired. He took a misstep or two — but even in that condition he’s a pretty good dancer, and I told him that, and he said the same to me. He became very complimentary; he liked my dress, said I have taste, said I have a great sense of humour — he went on like that. And then he told me that the lecture theatre filled with a beautiful light every time I walked into it.” She reflects. “A brilliant light.”
“This is as you were dancing?”
“That’s right.”
“What did you feel about all these compliments?”
“Well, I was. . complimented.”
Unaccountably she denies Patricia the answer obviously sought: that Jonathan was coming on like a train without brakes.
And with that, the clock strikes five, and Kimberley descends somewhat gracelessly from the witness box, nearly missing a step, her attention focused on Jonathan. She has glanced at him often, perhaps seeking applause from this theatre-goer for her latest sterling performance.
During my cross-examination, will Wally continue to swaddle her in protective blankets? I fear if he does I may have no recourse but to engage in a little S and M and smartly spank this unctuous judge’s bottom.
Jonathan approaches me, complaining, “Christ, the judge is crawling all over Kimberley.”
“Wally has fallen hopelessly in lust. And the object of his attentions seems not to be herself.”
“Whoever that is. Arthur, I’m inviting you and Augustina for dinner at the scene of the crime.”
“A pleasure, but I may be poor company.” I will be restless — my addiction is starting to gnaw again. I desperately need a fix of Margaret Blake.
At the bank of elevators I engage two of the jurors. “Ah, yes, just another average day in life’s weary round, Mrs. Nevers.”
“I wouldn’t know about that. “The music ofJamaica in her voice. She is shy but smiling, this dimpled secretary.
“How’s the season been, Mr. Lang? Bleak, I hear.” He is listed as a fisherman.
“Yeah, it’s been bad. They only gave us two days on the sockeye.”